10 Best 52w High Stocks for November 2025

10 Best 52w High Stocks for November 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The current equity market is defined by rapid technological innovation, resilient healthcare demand, and cyclical strength in select industrials. Our stock picks are selected using ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value tools, focusing on companies with strong fundamentals, attractive growth metrics, and evidence of undervaluation versus their calculated intrinsic value[1][2][3]. Each featured stock is screened for quality rating, financial health, and sector leadership, ensuring a diversified and robust watchlist for educational analysis.

Apple Inc. (AAPL)

MetricValue
Market Cap$4,041.6B
Quality Rating7.0
Intrinsic Value$93.0
1Y Return19.9%
Revenue$416.2B
Free Cash Flow$98.8B
Revenue Growth6.4%
FCF margin23.7%
Gross margin46.9%
ROIC205.1%
Total Debt to Equity10.8%

Investment Thesis

Apple remains a global technology leader, driven by its ecosystem of devices, services, and innovation. With a market cap of $4,041.6B and a quality rating of 7.0, Apple demonstrates robust financial health and operational efficiency. The company’s intrinsic value is calculated at $93.0, suggesting a potential gap versus current market pricing for value-focused investors. Over the past year, Apple delivered a 19.9% return, supported by $416.2B in revenue and $98.8B in free cash flow. Its revenue growth of 6.4% and FCF margin of 23.7% highlight sustainable profitability.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of services and subscription revenue streams
  • Continued innovation in hardware (iPhone, Mac, wearables)
  • Strong brand loyalty and global market penetration
  • High gross margin 46.9% and exceptional ROIC 205.1%

Risk Factors

  • Exposure to global supply chain disruptions
  • Regulatory scrutiny in key markets
  • High valuation relative to intrinsic value
  • Dependence on flagship product cycles

Alphabet Inc. (GOOG)

MetricValue
Market Cap$3,398.5B
Quality Rating8.0
Intrinsic Value$236.2
1Y Return63.6%
Revenue$385.5B
Free Cash Flow$73.6B
Revenue Growth13.5%
FCF margin19.1%
Gross margin59.2%
ROIC31.4%
Total Debt to Equity8.7%

Investment Thesis

Alphabet, the parent of Google, stands at the forefront of digital advertising, cloud computing, and AI innovation. With a $3,398.5B market cap and a quality rating of 8.0, Alphabet’s intrinsic value is $236.2, indicating potential undervaluation. The company posted a 1-year return of 63.6%, driven by $385.5B in revenue and $73.6B in free cash flow. Alphabet’s 13.5% revenue growth and 19.1% FCF margin reflect its scalable business model and operational leverage.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in Google Cloud and AI-driven products
  • Dominance in global search and digital advertising
  • Expansion into hardware and autonomous vehicles
  • Industry-leading gross margin 59.2% and strong ROIC 31.4%

Risk Factors

  • Regulatory challenges in the US and EU
  • Competitive threats from emerging tech platforms
  • Cyclical advertising market exposure
  • Concentration risk in core search business

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

MetricValue
Market Cap$3,398.5B
Quality Rating8.0
Intrinsic Value$241.4
1Y Return64.9%
Revenue$385.5B
Free Cash Flow$73.6B
Revenue Growth13.4%
FCF margin19.1%
Gross margin59.2%
ROIC31.4%
Total Debt to Equity8.7%

Investment Thesis

Alphabet’s Class A shares (GOOGL) mirror the same robust fundamentals as GOOG, with a market cap of $3,398.5B and quality rating of 8.0. The intrinsic value for GOOGL is $241.4, slightly higher than GOOG, with a 1-year return of 64.9%. Revenue and free cash flow remain identical, underscoring the consistency across share classes. GOOGL offers exposure to Alphabet’s innovation pipeline and resilient digital ecosystem.

Key Catalysts

  • Continued investment in AI and cloud infrastructure
  • Diversification into non-advertising revenue streams
  • Strong financial discipline and capital allocation
  • High gross margin and ROIC metrics

Risk Factors

  • Similar regulatory and competitive risks as GOOG
  • Share class voting structure may impact governance
  • Market sensitivity to tech sector volatility

ASML Holding N.V. (ASML)

MetricValue
Market Cap$410.6B
Quality Rating8.0
Intrinsic Value$861.0
1Y Return57.8%
Revenue€32.2B
Free Cash Flow€8,961.8M
Revenue Growth22.8%
FCF margin27.8%
Gross margin52.7%
ROIC30.2%
Total Debt to Equity14.2%

Investment Thesis

ASML is a critical supplier to the global semiconductor industry, specializing in advanced lithography systems. With a $410.6B market cap and a quality rating of 8.0, ASML’s intrinsic value is $861.0. The company achieved a 1-year return of 57.8%, supported by €32.2B in revenue and €8,961.8M in free cash flow. ASML’s 22.8% revenue growth and 27.8% FCF margin highlight its technological leadership and capital efficiency.

Key Catalysts

  • Rising demand for semiconductor manufacturing equipment
  • Technological leadership in EUV lithography
  • Expansion into new markets and geographies
  • Strong gross margin 52.7% and ROIC 30.2%

Risk Factors

  • Geopolitical risks affecting global chip supply chains
  • High R&D and capital expenditure requirements
  • Customer concentration among top chipmakers
  • Currency fluctuations impacting Euro-denominated results

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

MetricValue
Market Cap$289.5B
Quality Rating6.6
Intrinsic Value$78.2
1Y Return34.4%
Revenue$56.7B
Free Cash Flow$13.3B
Revenue Growth5.3%
FCF margin23.5%
Gross margin65.1%
ROIC13.3%
Total Debt to Equity63.3%

Investment Thesis

Cisco is a global leader in networking hardware, software, and services, with a market cap of $289.5B and a quality rating of 6.6. Its intrinsic value is $78.2, and the company posted a 1-year return of 34.4%. Cisco’s $56.7B revenue and $13.3B free cash flow reflect stable demand for enterprise networking solutions. The company’s 5.3% revenue growth and 23.5% FCF margin underscore its resilience in a competitive market.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in cloud networking and cybersecurity segments
  • Expansion of subscription-based software offerings
  • Strategic acquisitions to enhance product portfolio
  • Industry-leading gross margin 65.1%

Risk Factors

  • Intense competition from emerging networking firms
  • Cyclical IT spending trends
  • Elevated debt-to-equity ratio 63.3%
  • Exposure to global supply chain risks

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$199.1B
Quality Rating8.2
Intrinsic Value$136.3
1Y Return113.1%
Revenue$19.6B
Free Cash Flow$5,849.0M
Revenue Growth25.7%
FCF margin29.9%
Gross margin49.3%
ROIC51.7%
Total Debt to Equity44.0%

Investment Thesis

Lam Research is a key player in semiconductor process equipment, with a $199.1B market cap and a quality rating of 8.2. Its intrinsic value is $136.3, and the company delivered a remarkable 113.1% 1-year return. Lam’s $19.6B revenue and $5,849.0M free cash flow are supported by 25.7% revenue growth and a 29.9% FCF margin, reflecting strong demand for advanced chip fabrication technologies.

Key Catalysts

  • Accelerating global semiconductor capital expenditures
  • Innovation in etch and deposition equipment
  • Strategic partnerships with leading chipmakers
  • High ROIC 51.7% and robust gross margin 49.3%

Risk Factors

  • Cyclical nature of semiconductor industry
  • High capital intensity and R&D costs
  • Customer concentration risk
  • Elevated debt-to-equity ratio 44.0%

McKesson Corporation (MCK)

MetricValue
Market Cap$101.3B
Quality Rating6.8
Intrinsic Value$770.7
1Y Return62.4%
Revenue$377.6B
Free Cash Flow$6,325.0M
Revenue Growth20.3%
FCF margin1.7%
Gross margin3.4%
ROIC23.4%
Total Debt to Equity(1,151.0%)

Investment Thesis

McKesson is a leading healthcare distributor, with a $101.3B market cap and a quality rating of 6.8. Its intrinsic value is $770.7, and the company posted a 1-year return of 62.4%. McKesson’s $377.6B revenue and $6,325.0M free cash flow are driven by 20.3% revenue growth, though its FCF margin is modest at 1.7%. The company’s scale and distribution network provide stability in the healthcare supply chain.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of pharmaceutical distribution and specialty services
  • Growth in healthcare technology solutions
  • Strategic partnerships with providers and payers
  • Solid ROIC 23.4%

Risk Factors

  • Low gross margin 3.4% and FCF margin
  • High debt-to-equity ratio -1,151.0%
  • Regulatory and reimbursement risks
  • Competitive pressures in healthcare logistics

GSK plc (GSK)

MetricValue
Market Cap$95.2B
Quality Rating6.3
Intrinsic Value$125.9
1Y Return30.2%
Revenue$297.2B
Free Cash Flow$3,354.0M
Revenue Growth849.3%
FCF margin1.1%
Gross margin37.7%
ROIC86.2%
Total Debt to Equity4.8%

Investment Thesis

GSK is a global healthcare company focused on pharmaceuticals and vaccines, with a $95.2B market cap and a quality rating of 6.3. Its intrinsic value is $125.9, and the company posted a 1-year return of 30.2%. GSK’s $297.2B revenue and $3,354.0M free cash flow are supported by an exceptional 849.3% revenue growth, though its FCF margin is low at 1.1%. The company’s gross margin of 37.7% and ROIC of 86.2% highlight operational efficiency.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of vaccine and specialty pharma portfolio
  • Strategic R&D investments in new therapies
  • Global market penetration and partnerships
  • Strong ROIC and improving gross margin

Risk Factors

  • Low FCF margin and profitability pressures
  • Regulatory and patent risks
  • Currency and geopolitical exposure
  • Competitive dynamics in global pharma

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW)

MetricValue
Market Cap$91.8B
Quality Rating6.4
Intrinsic Value$108.7
1Y Return139.4%
Revenue$4,115.9M
Free Cash Flow$751.3M
Revenue Growth28.4%
FCF margin18.3%
Gross margin66.9%
ROIC(64.7%)
Total Debt to Equity113.1%

Investment Thesis

Snowflake is a cloud data platform innovator, with a $91.8B market cap and a quality rating of 6.4. Its intrinsic value is $108.7, and the company posted a 1-year return of 139.4%. Snowflake’s $4,115.9M revenue and $751.3M free cash flow are driven by 28.4% revenue growth and an 18.3% FCF margin. The company’s gross margin of 66.9% reflects its scalable SaaS business model.

Key Catalysts

  • Rapid adoption of cloud data warehousing solutions
  • Expansion into AI-driven analytics and data sharing
  • Strategic partnerships with major cloud providers
  • High gross margin and strong revenue growth

Risk Factors

  • Negative ROIC -64.7% and high debt-to-equity 113.1%
  • Competitive pressures from established cloud vendors
  • High valuation and growth expectations
  • Market sensitivity to tech sector volatility

Johnson Controls International plc (JCI)

MetricValue
Market Cap$75.0B
Quality Rating6.5
Intrinsic Value$52.4
1Y Return52.1%
Revenue$20.1B
Free Cash Flow$2,893.0M
Revenue Growth(25.4%)
FCF margin14.4%
Gross margin38.1%
ROIC8.3%
Total Debt to Equity60.4%

Investment Thesis

Johnson Controls is a diversified industrial company specializing in building technologies and solutions, with a $75.0B market cap and a quality rating of 6.5. Its intrinsic value is $52.4, and the company posted a 1-year return of 52.1%. JCI’s $20.1B revenue and $2,893.0M free cash flow are impacted by a -25.4% revenue growth rate, though its FCF margin is 14.4%. The company’s gross margin of 38.1% and ROIC of 8.3% reflect operational stability.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in smart building and energy efficiency solutions
  • Expansion into digital and IoT-enabled products
  • Strategic partnerships and global reach
  • Improving FCF margin and gross margin

Risk Factors

  • Declining revenue growth -25.4%
  • Elevated debt-to-equity ratio 60.4%
  • Cyclical exposure to construction and industrial markets
  • Competitive pressures in building technologies

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This watchlist spans technology (Apple, Alphabet, ASML, Cisco, Lam Research, Snowflake), healthcare (McKesson, GSK), and industrials (Johnson Controls), providing sectoral balance and risk mitigation. Technology stocks offer growth and innovation, healthcare stocks add defensive stability, and industrials contribute cyclical upside. Allocating across these sectors can help reduce volatility and enhance portfolio resilience.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Entry timing should consider sector rotation, earnings cycles, and macroeconomic trends. Technology stocks may benefit from momentum during innovation cycles, while healthcare and industrials can provide stability during market corrections. Dollar-cost averaging and staggered entry points can help manage risk and optimize long-term outcomes.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools, focusing on companies with strong fundamentals, attractive growth metrics, and evidence of undervaluation versus their calculated intrinsic value[1][2][3].

Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; technology leaders like Alphabet (GOOG/GOOGL) and Lam Research (LRCX) have high quality ratings and strong growth, while defensive picks like McKesson (MCK) and GSK provide stability. The "best" depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors—technology, healthcare, and industrials—can help manage risk and capture different market cycles. ValueSense’s watchlist is designed for educational analysis and portfolio construction insights.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector-specific challenges such as regulatory scrutiny (tech, healthcare), cyclical downturns (industrials), and valuation risks. Each stock’s risk factors are detailed in its analysis section above.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing depends on market conditions, earnings cycles, and macro trends. Educational strategies like dollar-cost averaging and monitoring sector rotation can help manage entry risk.