10 Best B2b Marketplaces for December 2025

10 Best B2b Marketplaces for December 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The stock market in 2025 continues to offer a mix of volatility and opportunity, with certain sectors showing resilience amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Value Sense’s proprietary selection process leverages a blend of fundamental analysis, intrinsic value calculations, and AI-driven insights to identify companies that are both undervalued and positioned for growth. Our criteria include strong quality ratings, robust free cash flow, attractive gross margins, and positive revenue growth trends. We also prioritize companies with manageable debt levels and high return on invested capital (ROIC), ensuring a balanced approach to risk and reward. This curated list features stocks from various sectors, including B2B marketplaces, digital services, and technology, offering a diversified set of investment opportunities.

Stock #1: Copart, Inc. (CPRT)

MetricValue
Market Cap$37.9B
Quality Rating7.1
Intrinsic Value$21.6
1Y Return-38.5%
Revenue$4,655.2M
Free Cash Flow$1,412.5M
Revenue Growth6.7%
FCF margin30.3%
Gross margin45.6%
ROIC30.6%
Total Debt to Equity1.0%

Investment Thesis

Copart, Inc. stands out as a leader in the online vehicle auction industry, boasting a market cap of $37.9 billion and a solid quality rating of 7.1. The company’s intrinsic value is estimated at $21.6, suggesting it may be undervalued relative to its fundamentals. With a revenue of $4,655.2 million and a free cash flow of $1,412.5 million, Copart demonstrates strong financial health. The company’s revenue growth of 6.7% and a free cash flow margin of 30.3% highlight its ability to generate consistent cash flow. Additionally, Copart’s gross margin of 45.6% and ROIC of 30.6% indicate efficient operations and a competitive advantage in its sector. The total debt to equity ratio of 1.0% is exceptionally low, reflecting a conservative capital structure.

Key Catalysts

  • Strong market position in online vehicle auctions
  • Consistent revenue and free cash flow growth
  • Low debt levels and high return on invested capital

Risk Factors

  • Exposure to cyclical automotive industry
  • Potential regulatory changes in the auction sector

Stock #2: Upwork Inc. (UPWK)

MetricValue
Market Cap$2,626.1M
Quality Rating7.6
Intrinsic Value$10.7
1Y Return16.3%
Revenue$780.9M
Free Cash Flow$216.3M
Revenue Growth2.5%
FCF margin27.7%
Gross margin77.8%
ROIC125.6%
Total Debt to Equity58.8%

Investment Thesis

Upwork Inc., a prominent player in the freelance services marketplace, has a market cap of $2,626.1 million and a quality rating of 7.6. The intrinsic value is estimated at $10.7, indicating potential undervaluation. Upwork’s revenue stands at $780.9 million, with a free cash flow of $216.3 million. The company’s revenue growth of 2.5% and a free cash flow margin of 27.7% reflect steady financial performance. Upwork’s gross margin of 77.8% is impressive, showcasing its ability to maintain high profitability. The ROIC of 125.6% is a standout metric, highlighting efficient use of capital. However, the total debt to equity ratio of 58.8% is higher than average, which could be a concern for risk-averse investors.

Key Catalysts

  • Growing demand for freelance services
  • High gross margin and strong ROIC
  • Expanding global user base

Risk Factors

  • Intense competition in the freelance marketplace
  • Higher debt levels compared to peers

Stock #3: Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)

MetricValue
Market Cap$932.1M
Quality Rating6.6
Intrinsic Value$29.5
1Y Return17.5%
Revenue$476.7M
Free Cash Flow$23.0M
Revenue Growth31.2%
FCF margin4.8%
Gross margin31.4%
ROIC20.0%
Total Debt to Equity6.8%

Investment Thesis

Liquidity Services, Inc. operates in the B2B marketplace sector, with a market cap of $932.1 million and a quality rating of 6.6. The intrinsic value is estimated at $29.5, suggesting it may be undervalued. The company’s revenue is $476.7 million, and free cash flow is $23.0 million. Liquidity Services has shown impressive revenue growth of 31.2%, indicating strong momentum. The free cash flow margin of 4.8% is modest, but the gross margin of 31.4% and ROIC of 20.0% are solid. The total debt to equity ratio of 6.8% is low, reflecting a healthy balance sheet.

Key Catalysts

  • Rapid revenue growth in B2B marketplaces
  • Low debt levels and solid ROIC
  • Expanding market presence

Risk Factors

  • Modest free cash flow margin
  • Potential market saturation in B2B marketplaces

Stock #4: Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR)

MetricValue
Market Cap$773.6M
Quality Rating6.0
Intrinsic Value$87.8
1Y Return-35.8%
Revenue$427.4M
Free Cash Flow$113.8M
Revenue Growth12.7%
FCF margin26.6%
Gross margin80.9%
ROIC(2.2%)
Total Debt to Equity116.3%

Investment Thesis

Fiverr International Ltd. is a leading platform for freelance services, with a market cap of $773.6 million and a quality rating of 6.0. The intrinsic value is estimated at $87.8, indicating potential undervaluation. Fiverr’s revenue is $427.4 million, and free cash flow is $113.8 million. The company’s revenue growth of 12.7% and a free cash flow margin of 26.6% are strong. Fiverr’s gross margin of 80.9% is exceptional, reflecting high profitability. However, the ROIC of 2.2% is negative, which could be a concern. The total debt to equity ratio of 116.3% is high, indicating significant leverage.

Key Catalysts

  • High gross margin and strong revenue growth
  • Expanding global user base
  • Diverse service offerings

Risk Factors

  • Negative ROIC
  • High debt levels

Stock #5: Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK)

MetricValue
Market Cap$737.6M
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$80.0
1Y Return-33.2%
Revenue$1,020.0M
Free Cash Flow$97.0M
Revenue Growth13.1%
FCF margin9.5%
Gross margin58.6%
ROIC4.7%
Total Debt to Equity23.0%

Investment Thesis

Shutterstock, Inc. is a major player in the digital content marketplace, with a market cap of $737.6 million and a quality rating of 6.1. The intrinsic value is estimated at $80.0, suggesting it may be undervalued. The company’s revenue is $1,020.0 million, and free cash flow is $97.0 million. Shutterstock’s revenue growth of 13.1% and a free cash flow margin of 9.5% are solid. The gross margin of 58.6% and ROIC of 4.7% are moderate. The total debt to equity ratio of 23.0% is manageable.

Key Catalysts

  • Strong revenue growth in digital content
  • Moderate debt levels
  • Expanding content library

Risk Factors

  • Moderate ROIC
  • Competition in digital content market

Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.

Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?

Find Hidden Gems First!


Stock #6: MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$719.6M
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$37.1
1Y Return1.0%
Revenue$1,123.1M
Free Cash Flow$87.2M
Revenue Growth64.9%
FCF margin7.8%
Gross margin15.2%
ROIC66.1%
Total Debt to Equity(33.4%)

Investment Thesis

MediaAlpha, Inc. operates in the digital advertising sector, with a market cap of $719.6 million and a quality rating of 6.1. The intrinsic value is estimated at $37.1, indicating potential undervaluation. The company’s revenue is $1,123.1 million, and free cash flow is $87.2 million. MediaAlpha’s revenue growth of 64.9% is exceptional, reflecting strong momentum. The free cash flow margin of 7.8% is modest, but the gross margin of 15.2% and ROIC of 66.1% are impressive. The total debt to equity ratio of 33.4% is negative, indicating a strong balance sheet.

Key Catalysts

  • Exceptional revenue growth in digital advertising
  • Strong ROIC and negative debt to equity ratio
  • Expanding market presence

Risk Factors

  • Modest free cash flow margin
  • Competition in digital advertising

Stock #7: Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY)

MetricValue
Market Cap$639.2M
Quality Rating5.1
Intrinsic Value$6.6
1Y Return-47.3%
Revenue$946.3M
Free Cash Flow$84.8M
Revenue Growth3.1%
FCF margin9.0%
Gross margin73.0%
ROIC12.0%
Total Debt to Equity6.7%

Investment Thesis

Getty Images Holdings, Inc. is a leader in the digital imagery sector, with a market cap of $639.2 million and a quality rating of 5.1. The intrinsic value is estimated at $6.6, suggesting it may be undervalued. The company’s revenue is $946.3 million, and free cash flow is $84.8 million. Getty Images’ revenue growth of 3.1% is modest, but the free cash flow margin of 9.0% is solid. The gross margin of 73.0% and ROIC of 12.0% are strong. The total debt to equity ratio of 6.7% is low, reflecting a healthy balance sheet.

Key Catalysts

  • Strong gross margin and ROIC
  • Low debt levels
  • Expanding digital imagery library

Risk Factors

  • Modest revenue growth
  • Competition in digital imagery

Stock #8: ZKH Group Limited (ZKH)

MetricValue
Market Cap$534.4M
Quality Rating4.1
Intrinsic Value$6.4
1Y Return-2.1%
RevenueCN¥8,800.7M
Free Cash FlowCN¥0.0
Revenue Growth(0.4%)
FCF margin0.0%
Gross margin16.9%
ROIC(27.7%)
Total Debt to Equity16.8%

Investment Thesis

ZKH Group Limited operates in the Chinese market, with a market cap of $534.4 million and a quality rating of 4.1. The intrinsic value is estimated at $6.4, indicating potential undervaluation. The company’s revenue is CN¥8,800.7 million, and free cash flow is CN¥0.0. ZKH’s revenue growth of 0.4% is negative, which could be a concern. The free cash flow margin of 0.0% is modest, and the gross margin of 16.9% is low. The ROIC of 27.7% is negative, and the total debt to equity ratio of 16.8% is manageable.

Key Catalysts

  • Potential undervaluation in Chinese market
  • Moderate debt levels

Risk Factors

  • Negative revenue growth and ROIC
  • Low free cash flow margin

Stock #9: TechTarget, Inc. (TTGT)

MetricValue
Market Cap$376.0M
Quality Rating5.4
Intrinsic Value$18.3
1Y Return-83.7%
Revenue$340.0M
Free Cash Flow($88.6M)
Revenue Growth50.2%
FCF margin(26.1%)
Gross margin83.4%
ROIC(122.1%)
Total Debt to Equity22.8%

Investment Thesis

TechTarget, Inc. is a technology media company, with a market cap of $376.0 million and a quality rating of 5.4. The intrinsic value is estimated at $18.3, suggesting it may be undervalued. The company’s revenue is $340.0 million, and free cash flow is ($88.6 million). TechTarget’s revenue growth of 50.2% is impressive, but the free cash flow margin of 26.1% is negative. The gross margin of 83.4% is high, and the ROIC of 122.1% is negative. The total debt to equity ratio of 22.8% is manageable.

Key Catalysts

  • High revenue growth in technology media
  • High gross margin

Risk Factors

  • Negative free cash flow margin and ROIC
  • Competition in technology media

Stock #10: Portage Biotech Inc. (PRTG)

MetricValue
Market Cap$5,950.3K
Quality Rating5.6
Intrinsic Value$1.6
1Y Return-16.8%
Revenue$0.0
Free Cash Flow($9,794.0K)
Revenue GrowthN/A
FCF marginN/A
Gross marginN/A
ROIC503.7%
Total Debt to Equity4.0%

Investment Thesis

Portage Biotech Inc. is a biotechnology company, with a market cap of $5,950.3K and a quality rating of 5.6. The intrinsic value is estimated at $1.6, indicating potential undervaluation. The company’s revenue is $0.0, and free cash flow is $9,794.0K. Portage Biotech’s revenue growth is N/A, and the free cash flow margin is N/A. The gross margin is N/A, and the ROIC of 503.7% is exceptionally high. The total debt to equity ratio of 4.0% is low.

Key Catalysts

  • Exceptional ROIC
  • Low debt levels

Risk Factors

  • No revenue and negative free cash flow
  • High risk in biotechnology sector

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This collection of stocks offers a diversified set of opportunities across various sectors, including B2B marketplaces, digital services, technology, and biotechnology. By including companies with different market caps, growth rates, and risk profiles, investors can build a balanced portfolio that mitigates sector-specific risks. The mix of high-growth and stable companies provides exposure to both emerging trends and established market leaders.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

When considering these positions, investors should evaluate current market conditions and their own risk tolerance. For high-growth stocks, a phased entry approach can help manage volatility. For stable, undervalued companies, a lump-sum investment may be appropriate. Regularly reviewing financial metrics and market trends will help investors make informed decisions about timing and allocation.

Explore More Investment Opportunities

More Articles You Might Like


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q: How were these stocks selected?
A: These stocks were selected based on a combination of fundamental analysis, intrinsic value calculations, and AI-driven insights, focusing on quality ratings, revenue growth, free cash flow, and manageable debt levels.

Q: What's the best stock from this list?
A: The best stock depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance. Copart, Inc. (CPRT) and Upwork Inc. (UPWK) stand out for their strong financials and growth potential.

Q: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
A: Diversification is recommended to mitigate risk. Consider allocating investments across different sectors and market caps based on your risk profile.

Q: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
A: Risks include sector-specific volatility, competition, and company-specific factors such as debt levels and negative ROIC.

Q: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
A: The best time to invest depends on market conditions and individual financial goals. Regularly reviewing financial metrics and market trends can help identify optimal entry points.