10 Best Biggest Stock Buybacks for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market landscape is defined by sector rotation, persistent inflationary pressures, and a renewed focus on company fundamentals. ValueSense’s methodology emphasizes intrinsic value analysis, quality ratings, and key financial metrics to identify stocks with strong fundamentals and attractive risk/reward profiles. Our selection process leverages proprietary tools—such as the intrinsic value calculator, quality ratings, and advanced screeners—to curate a diversified watchlist spanning commodities, industrials, and technology sectors[1][2].
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $341.4B |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $0.0 |
| 1Y Return | 29.9% |
| Revenue | $395.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $31.7M |
| Revenue Growth | (9.0%) |
| FCF margin | 8.0% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% |
| ROIC | 4.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 154.5% |
Investment Thesis
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is a niche industrial services provider with a market cap of $341.4 million. Despite a challenging macro environment, the company has delivered a robust 1-year return of 29.9%. Its free cash flow margin of 8.0% and a gross margin of 38.9% highlight operational efficiency. However, revenue growth is currently negative at 9.0%, indicating some cyclical headwinds.
The company’s quality rating of 5.8 suggests moderate business strength, while a high debt-to-equity ratio 154.5% warrants close monitoring. The business’s ability to generate positive free cash flow and maintain a respectable ROIC of 4.9% positions it as a potential value play in the industrial sector.
Key Catalysts
- Strong free cash flow generation despite revenue contraction
- Attractive gross margins relative to industry peers
- Potential for cyclical recovery in construction and infrastructure spending
Risk Factors
- Elevated leverage (total debt to equity at 154.5%)
- Negative revenue growth may persist if macro headwinds continue
- Intrinsic value currently not indicated, suggesting limited margin of safety
Stock #2: Rio Tinto Group (RIO)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $116.5B |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $105.2 |
| 1Y Return | 14.5% |
| Revenue | $107.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | $12.7B |
| Revenue Growth | (5.5%) |
| FCF margin | 11.8% |
| Gross margin | 27.7% |
| ROIC | 26.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 38.1% |
Investment Thesis
Rio Tinto Group is a global mining leader with a $116.5 billion market cap, offering diversified exposure to commodities. The company’s quality rating of 5.9 and a 1-year return of 14.5% reflect resilience amid commodity price volatility. With a free cash flow margin of 11.8% and a gross margin of 27.7%, Rio Tinto maintains solid profitability even as revenue growth has dipped by 5.5%.
The intrinsic value of $105.2 (relative to the current price) and an impressive ROIC of 26.6% underscore efficient capital allocation. Debt levels are manageable (total debt to equity at 38.1%), supporting financial flexibility for future growth and shareholder returns.
Key Catalysts
- High ROIC and efficient capital deployment
- Exposure to critical minerals supporting global infrastructure and energy transition
- Strong free cash flow supporting dividends and buybacks
Risk Factors
- Revenue contraction due to commodity price cycles
- Geopolitical and regulatory risks in mining jurisdictions
- Sensitivity to global economic growth
Stock #3: Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (FMX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $83.4B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $46.4 |
| 1Y Return | -1.6% |
| Revenue | $830.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $6,865.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 12.6% |
| FCF margin | 0.8% |
| Gross margin | 41.1% |
| ROIC | 23.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 17.4% |
Investment Thesis
Fomento Económico Mexicano (FMX) is a diversified Latin American conglomerate with a market cap of $83.4 billion. The company boasts a quality rating of 6.2 and a gross margin of 41.1%, reflecting strong operational execution. FMX has achieved 12.6% revenue growth over the past year, though its 1-year return is slightly negative at -1.6%.
Despite a low free cash flow margin 0.8%, FMX’s ROIC of 23.4% and conservative leverage (total debt to equity at 17.4%) highlight prudent capital management. The intrinsic value of $46.4 suggests a need for further price appreciation to unlock full value.
Key Catalysts
- Strong revenue growth in core markets
- High gross margin and efficient operations
- Low leverage supports financial stability
Risk Factors
- Weak free cash flow conversion despite high revenue
- Currency and macroeconomic risks in Latin America
- Current market price may not fully reflect intrinsic value
Stock #4: BHP Group Limited (BHP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $72.4B |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $134.7 |
| 1Y Return | 4.9% |
| Revenue | $107.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $20.7B |
| Revenue Growth | (10.1%) |
| FCF margin | 19.3% |
| Gross margin | 48.7% |
| ROIC | 28.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 46.9% |
Investment Thesis
BHP Group Limited, with a market cap of $72.4 billion, is a major player in the global mining sector. The company’s quality rating of 6.4 and a gross margin of 48.7% highlight its industry leadership. Despite a 10.1% decline in revenue growth, BHP’s free cash flow margin of 19.3% and ROIC of 28.5% indicate robust profitability and capital efficiency.
The intrinsic value of $134.7 points to potential undervaluation, while manageable leverage (total debt to equity at 46.9%) supports ongoing capital returns.
Key Catalysts
- High free cash flow and gross margins
- Strong capital allocation and ROIC
- Exposure to metals critical for global infrastructure and electrification
Risk Factors
- Revenue contraction due to commodity cycles
- Regulatory and environmental risks
- Sensitivity to global demand for raw materials
Stock #5: Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR-A)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $71.2B |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $35.7 |
| 1Y Return | -1.4% |
| Revenue | $86.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $18.6B |
| Revenue Growth | (13.6%) |
| FCF margin | 21.6% |
| Gross margin | 48.1% |
| ROIC | 10.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 92.4% |
Investment Thesis
Petrobras is a leading Latin American energy producer with a market cap of $71.2 billion. The company’s quality rating of 6.1 and a free cash flow margin of 21.6% underscore its cash-generative business model. Despite a 13.6% drop in revenue growth and a slightly negative 1-year return -1.4%, Petrobras maintains a gross margin of 48.1% and a ROIC of 10.0%.
The intrinsic value of $35.7 suggests upside potential if operational improvements materialize. Leverage is elevated (total debt to equity at 92.4%), reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the energy sector.
Key Catalysts
- High free cash flow and gross margins
- Strategic position in global energy markets
- Potential for operational turnaround
Risk Factors
- High leverage and exposure to oil price volatility
- Political and regulatory risks in Brazil
- Revenue contraction and macroeconomic headwinds
Stock #6: General Motors Company (GM)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $66.5B |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $53.5 |
| 1Y Return | 36.8% |
| Revenue | $183.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,269.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 0.6% |
| FCF margin | 1.2% |
| Gross margin | 9.6% |
| ROIC | 5.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 193.7% |
Investment Thesis
General Motors, with a market cap of $66.5 billion, is a global automotive leader. The company’s quality rating of 6.3 and a 1-year return of 36.8% reflect strong recent performance. GM’s gross margin of 9.6% and free cash flow margin of 1.2% are modest, but its ROIC of 5.5% and significant revenue base $183.9B highlight scale advantages.
The intrinsic value of $53.5 and high leverage (total debt to equity at 193.7%) suggest a need for careful balance sheet management as the company invests in electric vehicle (EV) transformation.
Key Catalysts
- Strong recent share price performance
- Strategic investments in EVs and autonomous vehicles
- Large revenue base and brand strength
Risk Factors
- High leverage and modest margins
- Cyclical exposure to auto demand
- Execution risk in EV transition
Stock #7: Equinor ASA (EQNR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $62.8B |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $58.6 |
| 1Y Return | 7.3% |
| Revenue | $263.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $3,899.2M |
| Revenue Growth | 151.0% |
| FCF margin | 1.5% |
| Gross margin | 32.2% |
| ROIC | 17.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
Equinor ASA is a Norwegian energy company with a market cap of $62.8 billion. The company’s quality rating of 5.8 and a 1-year return of 7.3% reflect steady performance. Equinor’s revenue growth of 151.0% is exceptional, though its free cash flow margin 1.5% and gross margin 32.2% are moderate.
With zero debt to equity, Equinor stands out for its financial conservatism. The intrinsic value of $58.6 and a ROIC of 17.0% support its investment case.
Key Catalysts
- Explosive revenue growth
- Strong balance sheet with no leverage
- Diversification into renewables
Risk Factors
- Low free cash flow margin despite high revenue
- Commodity price volatility
- Transition risks in global energy markets
Stock #8: Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $60.2B |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $348.9 |
| 1Y Return | 35.5% |
| Revenue | $133.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | $3,647.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (9.4%) |
| FCF margin | 2.7% |
| Gross margin | 7.7% |
| ROIC | 8.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 129.1% |
Investment Thesis
Marathon Petroleum is a major U.S. refiner with a market cap of $60.2 billion. The company’s quality rating of 6.4 and a 1-year return of 35.5% highlight strong recent momentum. Despite a 9.4% decline in revenue growth, MPC’s free cash flow margin of 2.7% and gross margin of 7.7% support ongoing capital returns.
The intrinsic value of $348.9 suggests significant upside, while leverage (total debt to equity at 129.1%) is elevated but manageable given sector norms.
Key Catalysts
- Strong recent share price performance
- High intrinsic value relative to current price
- Strategic position in U.S. refining
Risk Factors
- Low gross and free cash flow margins
- High leverage
- Exposure to refining margin volatility
Stock #9: Western Digital Corporation (WDC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $52.3B |
| Quality Rating | 7.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $107.3 |
| 1Y Return | 204.4% |
| Revenue | $12.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,940.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (5.1%) |
| FCF margin | 16.2% |
| Gross margin | 39.3% |
| ROIC | 42.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 76.6% |
Investment Thesis
Western Digital is a technology hardware leader with a market cap of $52.3 billion. The company’s quality rating of 7.5 is the highest in this watchlist, and its 1-year return of 204.4% is exceptional. Despite a 5.1% decline in revenue growth, WDC’s free cash flow margin of 16.2% and gross margin of 39.3% highlight robust profitability.
The intrinsic value of $107.3 and a ROIC of 42.2% underscore efficient capital deployment. Leverage is moderate (total debt to equity at 76.6%).
Key Catalysts
- Outstanding recent share price performance
- High quality rating and profitability
- Strong free cash flow and ROIC
Risk Factors
- Revenue contraction in a cyclical industry
- Competitive pressures in storage hardware
- Technology obsolescence risk
Stock #10: TC Energy Corporation (TRP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $52.1B |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $36.2 |
| 1Y Return | 9.2% |
| Revenue | CA$12.8B |
| Free Cash Flow | CA$1,439.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (20.1%) |
| FCF margin | 11.2% |
| Gross margin | 49.5% |
| ROIC | 4.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 159.0% |
Investment Thesis
TC Energy is a North American energy infrastructure company with a market cap of $52.1 billion. The company’s quality rating of 5.8 and a 1-year return of 9.2% reflect steady performance. Despite a 20.1% decline in revenue growth, TRP’s free cash flow margin of 11.2% and gross margin of 49.5% highlight operational strength.
The intrinsic value of $36.2 and a high leverage ratio (total debt to equity at 159.0%) suggest a need for balance sheet discipline.
Key Catalysts
- High gross and free cash flow margins
- Strategic position in North American energy infrastructure
- Stable cash flows from regulated assets
Risk Factors
- High leverage and negative revenue growth
- Regulatory and environmental risks
- Exposure to energy transition dynamics
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans commodities, industrials, energy, automotive, and technology, providing sectoral diversification to mitigate single-industry risk. The inclusion of both high-growth and value-oriented stocks—such as Western Digital (technology), Rio Tinto and BHP (commodities), and General Motors (automotive)—enables a balanced approach to risk and return. Exposure to both developed and emerging markets (FMX, Petrobras) further enhances portfolio resilience.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given the cyclical nature of many featured stocks, staggered entry and dollar-cost averaging can help manage volatility. Monitoring sector-specific catalysts—such as commodity price trends, infrastructure spending, and technology adoption—can inform optimal entry points. ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools and backtesting features support disciplined entry and exit decisions[1][2].
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screeners, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, and key financial metrics such as free cash flow, ROIC, and debt levels[1][2].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; for example, Western Digital (WDC) stands out for its high quality rating and exceptional 1-year return, while BHP and Rio Tinto provide strong capital efficiency and commodity exposure.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors and regions is recommended for risk management. This watchlist is designed to provide a blend of growth and value opportunities for educational analysis.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include sector cyclicality, high leverage for some companies, and exposure to macroeconomic and regulatory changes. Each stock’s risk profile is detailed in its analysis section.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing depends on sector trends, company-specific catalysts, and market conditions. ValueSense’s tools can help monitor intrinsic value gaps and historical performance to inform entry strategies.