10 Best Dividend Growth Stocks for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market landscape is defined by robust growth in technology, resilient performance in healthcare, and renewed interest in consumer and financial sectors. Our selection methodology leverages ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and fundamental analysis tools to identify stocks with strong financial health, attractive growth prospects, and undervaluation signals. Each pick is screened for sector leadership, financial stability, and recent performance, ensuring a diversified and high-quality watchlist[1][2][3].
Featured Stock Analysis
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4,933.9B |
| Quality Rating | 8.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $73.3 |
| 1Y Return | 52.5% |
| Revenue | $165.2B |
| Free Cash Flow | $72.0B |
| Revenue Growth | 71.6% |
| FCF margin | 43.6% |
| Gross margin | 69.8% |
| ROIC | 176.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 10.6% |
Investment Thesis
NVIDIA stands at the forefront of the AI and semiconductor revolution, boasting a market cap of $4,933.9B and an impressive 1-year return of 52.5%. The company’s revenue growth of 71.6% and a free cash flow margin of 43.6% highlight its operational strength. With a quality rating of 8.3 and an intrinsic value of $73.3, NVIDIA is positioned as a leader in high-performance computing and data center solutions.
NVIDIA’s gross margin of 69.8% and ROIC of 176.6% underscore its efficiency and profitability. The company’s low total debt to equity 10.6% further supports its financial stability.
Key Catalysts
- Accelerating demand for AI chips and data center infrastructure
- Expansion into automotive and edge computing markets
- Strategic partnerships with leading tech firms
- Strong free cash flow supporting innovation and shareholder returns
Risk Factors
- High valuation relative to intrinsic value
- Cyclical nature of semiconductor industry
- Competitive pressures from AMD and Intel
- Regulatory risks in global markets
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3,848.9B |
| Quality Rating | 7.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $479.2 |
| 1Y Return | 27.9% |
| Revenue | $293.8B |
| Free Cash Flow | $78.0B |
| Revenue Growth | 15.6% |
| FCF margin | 26.6% |
| Gross margin | 68.8% |
| ROIC | 27.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 16.7% |
Investment Thesis
Microsoft, with a market cap of $3,848.9B and a 1-year return of 27.9%, continues to dominate the enterprise software and cloud computing sectors. Its revenue of $293.8B and free cash flow of $78.0B reflect robust operational performance. The company’s quality rating of 7.6 and intrinsic value of $479.2 indicate strong fundamentals and growth potential.
Microsoft’s gross margin of 68.8% and ROIC of 27.2% highlight its profitability and capital efficiency. The company maintains a moderate total debt to equity ratio of 16.7%, supporting its financial resilience.
Key Catalysts
- Continued growth in Azure cloud services
- Expansion of AI-powered productivity tools
- Strong enterprise demand for software solutions
- Strategic acquisitions enhancing product portfolio
Risk Factors
- Intensifying competition in cloud and productivity software
- Regulatory scrutiny in global markets
- Currency fluctuations impacting international revenue
- Dependence on enterprise IT spending cycles
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,742.4B |
| Quality Rating | 8.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $104.8 |
| 1Y Return | 117.7% |
| Revenue | $59.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | $24.9B |
| Revenue Growth | 28.0% |
| FCF margin | 41.6% |
| Gross margin | 66.8% |
| ROIC | 15.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 87.7% |
Investment Thesis
Broadcom, with a market cap of $1,742.4B and a stellar 1-year return of 117.7%, is a key player in the semiconductor and infrastructure software markets. The company’s revenue growth of 28.0% and free cash flow margin of 41.6% reflect strong operational execution. With a quality rating of 8.2 and intrinsic value of $104.8, Broadcom is well-positioned for continued expansion.
Broadcom’s gross margin of 66.8% and ROIC of 15.1% demonstrate solid profitability. However, its total debt to equity ratio of 87.7% warrants attention regarding leverage.
Key Catalysts
- Rising demand for networking and connectivity solutions
- Expansion into enterprise software via strategic acquisitions
- Strong free cash flow supporting dividend growth
- Leadership in high-speed chip technology
Risk Factors
- Elevated debt levels increasing financial risk
- Integration challenges from recent acquisitions
- Exposure to cyclical demand in hardware markets
- Competitive pressures in both semiconductor and software segments
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,558.3B |
| Quality Rating | 8.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $415.7 |
| 1Y Return | 58.1% |
| Revenue | NT$3,631.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | NT$889.9B |
| Revenue Growth | 37.0% |
| FCF margin | 24.5% |
| Gross margin | 59.0% |
| ROIC | 36.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 19.0% |
Investment Thesis
TSMC, with a market cap of $1,558.3B and a 1-year return of 58.1%, is the world’s leading pure-play foundry, enabling innovation for global chipmakers. The company’s revenue growth of 37.0% and free cash flow margin of 24.5% highlight its scale and efficiency. TSMC’s quality rating of 8.2 and intrinsic value of $415.7 reinforce its leadership position.
Gross margin of 59.0% and ROIC of 36.2% indicate strong profitability, while a total debt to equity ratio of 19.0% reflects prudent financial management.
Key Catalysts
- Global leadership in advanced semiconductor manufacturing
- Expansion of capacity for 3nm and 2nm process nodes
- Strategic partnerships with leading technology firms
- Robust demand from AI, automotive, and IoT sectors
Risk Factors
- Geopolitical risks in Taiwan and global supply chain
- High capital expenditure requirements
- Cyclical demand in consumer electronics
- Competitive pressures from Samsung and Intel
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $742.1B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $179.3 |
| 1Y Return | 56.8% |
| Revenue | $59.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | ($5,880.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | 9.7% |
| FCF margin | (10.0%) |
| Gross margin | 77.2% |
| ROIC | 13.7% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 427.3% |
Investment Thesis
Oracle, with a market cap of $742.1B and a 1-year return of 56.8%, is a global leader in database software and cloud infrastructure. The company’s revenue growth of 9.7% and gross margin of 77.2% highlight its strong market position. Oracle’s quality rating of 6.2 and intrinsic value of $179.3 indicate moderate value and stability.
Despite strong gross margins, Oracle’s negative free cash flow margin -10.0% and high total debt to equity 427.3% raise concerns about financial flexibility.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in cloud infrastructure and SaaS offerings
- Expansion into AI-powered database solutions
- Strong enterprise customer base
- Strategic acquisitions driving product innovation
Risk Factors
- High leverage and negative free cash flow
- Intense competition in cloud and database markets
- Integration risks from acquisitions
- Regulatory scrutiny in global operations
Visa Inc. (V)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $660.0B |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $213.5 |
| 1Y Return | 18.2% |
| Revenue | $40.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $21.6B |
| Revenue Growth | 11.3% |
| FCF margin | 53.9% |
| Gross margin | 57.7% |
| ROIC | 37.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 66.4% |
Investment Thesis
Visa, with a market cap of $660.0B and a 1-year return of 18.2%, remains a dominant force in global payments. The company’s revenue growth of 11.3% and free cash flow margin of 53.9% highlight its operational strength. Visa’s quality rating of 7.0 and intrinsic value of $213.5 reflect solid fundamentals.
Gross margin of 57.7% and ROIC of 37.8% indicate strong profitability, while a total debt to equity ratio of 66.4% is manageable for a company of its scale.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of digital payments and e-commerce
- Growth in cross-border transaction volumes
- Strategic partnerships with fintech firms
- Innovation in payment security and technology
Risk Factors
- Regulatory risks in global markets
- Competition from emerging payment platforms
- Exposure to economic cycles affecting consumer spending
- Currency fluctuations impacting international revenue
Mastercard Incorporated (MA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $498.4B |
| Quality Rating | 7.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $362.5 |
| 1Y Return | 11.0% |
| Revenue | $31.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | $17.0B |
| Revenue Growth | 15.6% |
| FCF margin | 54.0% |
| Gross margin | 77.5% |
| ROIC | 70.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 239.7% |
Investment Thesis
Mastercard, with a market cap of $498.4B and a 1-year return of 11.0%, is a global leader in payment processing and financial technology. The company’s revenue growth of 15.6% and free cash flow margin of 54.0% highlight its operational efficiency. Mastercard’s quality rating of 7.6 and intrinsic value of $362.5 indicate strong fundamentals.
Gross margin of 77.5% and ROIC of 70.1% underscore its profitability, though a total debt to equity ratio of 239.7% suggests elevated leverage.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in digital payments and fintech innovation
- Expansion into emerging markets
- Strategic partnerships with financial institutions
- Investment in cybersecurity and fraud prevention
Risk Factors
- High leverage and debt levels
- Regulatory scrutiny in payments industry
- Competition from alternative payment platforms
- Exposure to global economic cycles
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $458.7B |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $186.0 |
| 1Y Return | 20.0% |
| Revenue | $92.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $19.1B |
| Revenue Growth | 5.1% |
| FCF margin | 20.7% |
| Gross margin | 68.1% |
| ROIC | 11.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 8.1% |
Investment Thesis
Johnson & Johnson, with a market cap of $458.7B and a 1-year return of 20.0%, is a diversified healthcare leader. The company’s revenue growth of 5.1% and free cash flow margin of 20.7% highlight its stability. J&J’s quality rating of 6.3 and intrinsic value of $186.0 indicate moderate value and resilience.
Gross margin of 68.1% and ROIC of 11.2% reflect solid profitability, while a low total debt to equity ratio of 8.1% supports financial health.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion in pharmaceuticals and medical devices
- Strong pipeline of innovative healthcare products
- Global reach and brand recognition
- Consistent dividend growth
Risk Factors
- Regulatory and litigation risks
- Slower growth in consumer health segment
- Currency fluctuations impacting international revenue
- Competition in pharmaceuticals and devices
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $404.7B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $393.0 |
| 1Y Return | 4.5% |
| Revenue | $275.2B |
| Free Cash Flow | $7,837.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 8.2% |
| FCF margin | 2.8% |
| Gross margin | 12.8% |
| ROIC | 21.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 28.0% |
Investment Thesis
Costco, with a market cap of $404.7B and a 1-year return of 4.5%, is a leader in membership-based retail. The company’s revenue growth of 8.2% and free cash flow margin of 2.8% highlight its steady performance. Costco’s quality rating of 6.2 and intrinsic value of $393.0 indicate moderate value.
Gross margin of 12.8% and ROIC of 21.5% reflect operational efficiency, while a total debt to equity ratio of 28.0% supports financial stability.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of global store footprint
- Growth in e-commerce and digital sales
- Strong membership renewal rates
- Efficient supply chain management
Risk Factors
- Low gross margin due to competitive pricing
- Exposure to consumer spending cycles
- Competition from online retailers
- Currency fluctuations impacting international sales
The Home Depot, Inc. (HD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $376.6B |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $274.2 |
| 1Y Return | -3.1% |
| Revenue | $165.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $14.2B |
| Revenue Growth | 8.5% |
| FCF margin | 8.6% |
| Gross margin | 33.3% |
| ROIC | 20.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 575.0% |
Investment Thesis
Home Depot, with a market cap of $376.6B and a 1-year return of -3.1%, is the largest home improvement retailer in the U.S. The company’s revenue growth of 8.5% and free cash flow margin of 8.6% highlight its resilience. Home Depot’s quality rating of 6.0 and intrinsic value of $274.2 indicate moderate value.
Gross margin of 33.3% and ROIC of 20.9% reflect solid profitability, but a high total debt to equity ratio of 575.0% raises concerns about leverage.
Key Catalysts
- Continued demand for home improvement products
- Expansion of professional contractor services
- Growth in e-commerce and digital initiatives
- Strong brand and customer loyalty
Risk Factors
- High leverage and debt levels
- Exposure to housing market cycles
- Competition from online and brick-and-mortar retailers
- Inflationary pressures on supply chain
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans technology (NVIDIA, Microsoft, Broadcom, TSMC, Oracle), financials (Visa, Mastercard), healthcare (Johnson & Johnson), and consumer sectors (Costco, Home Depot). The allocation balances high-growth tech with stable consumer and healthcare stocks, mitigating sector-specific risks and enhancing overall portfolio resilience. Cross-sector exposure supports diversification, reducing volatility and providing multiple avenues for growth.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Market timing for these positions should consider macroeconomic trends, sector rotation, and individual company catalysts. Entry strategies may include dollar-cost averaging to mitigate volatility, monitoring earnings releases for inflection points, and using ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools to identify optimal buy zones. Investors may also track sector momentum and global economic indicators to refine entry timing.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and fundamental analysis tools, focusing on financial health, growth prospects, and sector leadership[1][2].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
The “best” stock depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance; NVIDIA and Broadcom currently stand out for their growth rates and quality ratings, while Microsoft and TSMC offer strong fundamentals and stability.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors and industries is recommended to reduce risk and enhance portfolio resilience; this watchlist is structured to provide balanced exposure.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include sector-specific volatility, high leverage for some companies, regulatory scrutiny, and macroeconomic uncertainties. Each stock’s risk profile is detailed in its analysis section.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing depends on market conditions, company-specific catalysts, and valuation signals. Using ValueSense’s intrinsic value and financial analysis tools can help identify favorable entry points.