10 Best Events for October 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market environment is defined by sector rotation, persistent macroeconomic uncertainty, and a renewed focus on company fundamentals. Our stock selection methodology emphasizes intrinsic value, quality ratings, and free cash flow generation. Each stock is screened for sector leadership, margin resilience, and growth catalysts, with a preference for companies trading below their calculated intrinsic value. This diversified watchlist spans entertainment, technology, industrials, and media, providing exposure to both defensive and growth-oriented opportunities.
Featured Stock Analysis
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.2B |
| Quality Rating | 6.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $163.4 |
| 1Y Return | 32.6% |
| Revenue | $23.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,086.2M |
| Revenue Growth | (0.4%) |
| FCF margin | 4.6% |
| Gross margin | 25.2% |
| ROIC | 16.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 365.2% |
Investment Thesis
Live Nation Entertainment is a global leader in live events, with a robust $35.2B market cap and a strong 1-year return of 32.6%. The company’s intrinsic value is estimated at $163.4, suggesting potential upside relative to current market pricing. Despite modest revenue contraction -0.4%, Live Nation’s scale and brand power support a healthy $23.7B revenue base and $1,086.2M in free cash flow. Its quality rating of 6.6 reflects solid operational execution, while a 16.2% ROIC demonstrates efficient capital allocation.
Key Catalysts
- Dominant position in live entertainment and ticketing
- Strong free cash flow and resilient gross margin 25.2%
- Expansion of global event portfolio
- Recovery in live events post-pandemic
Risk Factors
- High total debt to equity 365.2% increases financial risk
- Revenue growth remains slightly negative
- Sensitivity to macroeconomic cycles and discretionary spending
Formula One Group (FWONK)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.1B |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $49.3 |
| 1Y Return | 26.0% |
| Revenue | $3,866.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $694.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 5.8% |
| FCF margin | 18.0% |
| Gross margin | 31.7% |
| ROIC | 3.7% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 38.6% |
Investment Thesis
Formula One Group offers exposure to the global motorsports industry, with a $25.1B market cap and a quality rating of 7.0. The company’s intrinsic value stands at $49.3, and it has delivered a 26.0% 1-year return. Formula One’s revenue growth of 5.8% and robust gross margin 31.7% highlight its strong brand and monetization of media rights. Free cash flow of $694.0M and an 18.0% FCF margin underscore its financial health.
Key Catalysts
- Global expansion of F1 fanbase and digital engagement
- Lucrative media and sponsorship deals
- High-margin business model with recurring revenue streams
- Potential for new race venues and geographic growth
Risk Factors
- Moderate total debt to equity 38.6%
- ROIC of 3.7% indicates room for capital efficiency improvement
- Dependence on global sports calendar and event attendance
Informatica Inc. (INFA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7,521.8M |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $33.1 |
| 1Y Return | -7.6% |
| Revenue | $1,662.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $425.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 1.2% |
| FCF margin | 25.6% |
| Gross margin | 78.7% |
| ROIC | 2.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 78.5% |
Investment Thesis
Informatica is a data management and cloud integration specialist with a $7.5B market cap. Despite a modest 1.2% revenue growth and a -7.6% 1-year return, the company’s intrinsic value of $33.1 suggests undervaluation. Informatica’s standout metrics include a 78.7% gross margin and a 25.6% FCF margin, reflecting a scalable, high-quality SaaS business. The quality rating of 6.0 and $425.0M in free cash flow position Informatica as a potential turnaround candidate.
Key Catalysts
- Accelerating enterprise cloud adoption
- Expansion of data governance and AI-driven analytics
- High gross and free cash flow margins
- Strategic partnerships with major cloud providers
Risk Factors
- Total debt to equity at 78.5%
- Low ROIC 2.6%
- Recent negative share price momentum
Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3,518.4M |
| Quality Rating | 5.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $77.0 |
| 1Y Return | -31.6% |
| Revenue | $949.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $250.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 11.4% |
| FCF margin | 26.4% |
| Gross margin | 78.0% |
| ROIC | (3.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 120.8% |
Investment Thesis
Tenable Holdings is a cybersecurity firm with a $3.5B market cap and a quality rating of 5.6. The company’s intrinsic value is $77.0, and it boasts a strong 11.4% revenue growth rate, though its 1-year return is -31.6%. Tenable’s 78.0% gross margin and 26.4% FCF margin highlight operational efficiency, while $250.5M in free cash flow supports ongoing innovation.
Key Catalysts
- Rising demand for enterprise cybersecurity solutions
- Expansion into cloud and IoT security
- High recurring revenue and margin profile
- Strong free cash flow generation
Risk Factors
- Negative ROIC -3.3%
- Elevated total debt to equity 120.8%
- Recent share price underperformance
Sphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2,164.3M |
| Quality Rating | 5.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $74.2 |
| 1Y Return | 25.1% |
| Revenue | $1,099.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($44.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | 7.1% |
| FCF margin | (4.0%) |
| Gross margin | 48.2% |
| ROIC | (10.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 44.0% |
Investment Thesis
Sphere Entertainment Co. operates in the live entertainment and venue sector, with a $2.2B market cap and a quality rating of 5.4. The company’s intrinsic value is $74.2, and it has delivered a 25.1% 1-year return. Sphere’s revenue growth of 7.1% and a standout 48.2% gross margin reflect strong operational leverage, though negative free cash flow -$44.0M and ROIC -10.7% highlight near-term challenges.
Key Catalysts
- Unique venue experiences and technology-driven events
- High gross margin business model
- Potential for new venue launches and partnerships
- Recovery in live entertainment demand
Risk Factors
- Negative free cash flow and ROIC
- Moderate total debt to equity 44.0%
- Execution risk on new projects
CTS Corporation (CTS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,225.2M |
| Quality Rating | 6.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $60.8 |
| 1Y Return | -16.5% |
| Revenue | $520.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | $87.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 1.1% |
| FCF margin | 16.8% |
| Gross margin | 37.8% |
| ROIC | 11.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 25.0% |
Investment Thesis
CTS Corporation is an industrial technology company with a $1.2B market cap and a quality rating of 6.8. The company’s intrinsic value is $60.8, and it has a -16.5% 1-year return. CTS’s steady revenue $520.9M, 1.1% revenue growth, and 16.8% FCF margin signal operational stability. With a gross margin of 37.8% and a strong ROIC of 11.2%, CTS is positioned as a value-oriented industrial play.
Key Catalysts
- Exposure to diversified industrial end-markets
- Consistent free cash flow generation
- Attractive intrinsic value relative to market cap
- Low total debt to equity 25.0%
Risk Factors
- Recent share price underperformance
- Modest revenue growth
- Cyclical exposure to industrial demand
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,007.0M |
| Quality Rating | 5.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $90.3 |
| 1Y Return | -16.7% |
| Revenue | ($131.2M) |
| Free Cash Flow | ($15.2M) |
| Revenue Growth | N/A |
| FCF margin | 11.6% |
| Gross margin | (105.7%) |
| ROIC | (3.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 20.0% |
Investment Thesis
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. is a niche player in the attractions and hospitality sector, with a $1.0B market cap and a quality rating of 5.0. The company’s intrinsic value is $90.3, but it has faced a -16.7% 1-year return and negative revenue $131.2M. Despite these challenges, Pursuit’s FCF margin 11.6% and low total debt to equity 20.0% suggest potential for operational turnaround.
Key Catalysts
- Unique positioning in experiential travel and attractions
- Potential for margin improvement
- Low leverage compared to peers
- Intrinsic value significantly above current market cap
Risk Factors
- Negative revenue and free cash flow
- Gross margin deeply negative -105.7%
- Weak ROIC -3.7%
Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $949.5M |
| Quality Rating | 6.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $1.5 |
| 1Y Return | 16.0% |
| Revenue | $432.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $53.6M |
| Revenue Growth | 10.0% |
| FCF margin | 12.4% |
| Gross margin | 63.3% |
| ROIC | 5.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 3.5% |
Investment Thesis
Emerald Holding, Inc. is a media and events company with a $949.5M market cap and a quality rating of 6.7. The company’s intrinsic value is $1.5, and it has posted a 16.0% 1-year return. Emerald’s 10.0% revenue growth, 12.4% FCF margin, and 63.3% gross margin highlight strong operational performance. Its low total debt to equity 3.5% and 5.5% ROIC further support its financial stability.
Key Catalysts
- Recovery in live events and trade shows
- High gross and free cash flow margins
- Conservative balance sheet with low leverage
- Consistent revenue growth
Risk Factors
- Intrinsic value below current market cap
- Modest ROIC
- Event-driven revenue cyclicality
Gannett Co., Inc. (GCI)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $520.5M |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $14.0 |
| 1Y Return | -36.2% |
| Revenue | $2,390.1M |
| Free Cash Flow | $43.2M |
| Revenue Growth | (8.0%) |
| FCF margin | 1.8% |
| Gross margin | 53.5% |
| ROIC | 12.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 497.8% |
Investment Thesis
Gannett Co., Inc. is a media company with a $520.5M market cap and a quality rating of 5.8. The company’s intrinsic value is $14.0, but it has experienced a -36.2% 1-year return and an 8.0% revenue decline. Gannett’s $2.4B revenue base, 53.5% gross margin, and 12.0% ROIC indicate underlying operational strengths, while its high total debt to equity 497.8% is a concern.
Key Catalysts
- Large-scale media footprint
- Strong gross margin and ROIC
- Potential for digital transformation and cost rationalization
- Intrinsic value above current market cap
Risk Factors
- High leverage and declining revenue
- Negative share price momentum
- Industry headwinds in traditional media
Eventbrite, Inc. (EB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $225.9M |
| Quality Rating | 5.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $36.6 |
| 1Y Return | -20.3% |
| Revenue | $300.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | $41.8M |
| Revenue Growth | (11.5%) |
| FCF margin | 13.9% |
| Gross margin | 67.8% |
| ROIC | 30.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 137.1% |
Investment Thesis
Eventbrite, Inc. is a digital ticketing platform with a $225.9M market cap and a quality rating of 5.4. The company’s intrinsic value is $36.6, and it has a -20.3% 1-year return. Eventbrite’s $300.9M revenue, 67.8% gross margin, and 13.9% FCF margin reflect a scalable digital business. Its 30.1% ROIC is a standout, though high leverage (137.1% total debt to equity) and negative revenue growth -11.5% are concerns.
Key Catalysts
- Digital transformation of event ticketing
- High ROIC and gross margin
- Potential for margin expansion as live events recover
- Scalable technology platform
Risk Factors
- Negative revenue growth and share price performance
- High leverage
- Competitive pressures in digital ticketing
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist provides broad sector exposure—from live entertainment (LYV, SPHR, EB) and media (FWONK, GCI, EEX) to technology (INFA, TENB) and industrials (CTS). The mix of high-growth, turnaround, and value-oriented stocks helps mitigate sector-specific risks and offers a blend of defensive and cyclical opportunities. The inclusion of both large-cap and small/mid-cap companies further enhances diversification, balancing stability with upside potential.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given the varied performance profiles and sector exposures, entry strategies should consider both technical and fundamental signals. Investors may look for: - Pullbacks in high-quality names with strong free cash flow (e.g., INFA, CTS) - Momentum entries in recovering sectors (e.g., live events, media) - Staggered entry points to manage volatility and macroeconomic uncertainty
Dollar-cost averaging and periodic portfolio reviews can help manage risk and capture opportunities as market conditions evolve.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- 6 Best E Sports for October 2025
- 10 Best Content Production for October 2025
- 10 Best Sensors Instruments for October 2025
- 10 Best Automation Control Systems for October 2025
- 8 Best 3d Printing for October 2025
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen based on ValueSense’s intrinsic value methodology, quality ratings, sector diversification, and key financial metrics such as free cash flow, revenue growth, and return on invested capital.
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; for example, Formula One Group (FWONK) and Live Nation (LYV) stand out for their strong returns and operational quality, but the best stock depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is a core principle of portfolio construction. This watchlist is designed to provide sector and market cap diversification, but allocation decisions should be tailored to individual risk profiles and investment strategies.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include high leverage (notably in LYV and GCI), negative revenue growth (e.g., EB, GCI), and sector-specific challenges such as event-driven cyclicality and digital disruption.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing depends on market conditions, technical entry points, and individual financial goals. Consider dollar-cost averaging and monitoring for pullbacks or sector rotations to optimize entry.
For more in-depth analysis and real-time updates, visit ValueSense and explore our full suite of research tools and stock evaluations.