10 Best Fossil Fuels for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market landscape is marked by sector rotation, persistent inflationary pressures, and a renewed focus on cash flow and balance sheet strength. Our selection methodology leverages ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and fundamental screeners to identify stocks that combine undervaluation, resilient financials, and sectoral leadership. Each pick is evaluated for growth catalysts, risk factors, and its role in a diversified portfolio, ensuring a robust watchlist for 2025[1][2].
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $495.3B |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $49.5 |
| 1Y Return | -0.4% |
| Revenue | $331.6B |
| Free Cash Flow | $17.7B |
| Revenue Growth | (2.4%) |
| FCF margin | 5.3% |
| Gross margin | 24.9% |
| ROIC | 7.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 25.0% |
Investment Thesis
Exxon Mobil stands as a global energy leader with a market cap of $495.3B, offering stability and scale in the oil & gas sector. Despite a modest 1-year return of -0.4%, the company’s robust revenue base $331.6B and free cash flow $17.7B underscore its capacity to weather commodity cycles. ValueSense assigns a quality rating of 5.9, with an intrinsic value of $49.5, suggesting the stock is trading near or above fair value. Exxon’s disciplined capital allocation and moderate debt-to-equity ratio 25.0% support its long-term sustainability.
Key Catalysts
- Ongoing cost optimization and capital discipline
- Strategic investments in low-carbon initiatives
- Potential for dividend growth and share buybacks
- Resilience to oil price volatility due to integrated operations
Risk Factors
- Exposure to global energy price fluctuations
- Regulatory and ESG pressures on fossil fuel majors
- Sluggish revenue growth (-2.4% YoY)
- Moderate FCF margin 5.3% compared to peers
Stock #2: Chevron Corporation (CVX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $284.2B |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $108.4 |
| 1Y Return | 8.2% |
| Revenue | $192.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $10.5B |
| Revenue Growth | (0.8%) |
| FCF margin | 5.5% |
| Gross margin | 28.3% |
| ROIC | (2.8%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 21.9% |
Investment Thesis
Chevron, with a $284.2B market cap, is another oil & gas heavyweight, delivering an 8.2% 1-year return. The company’s quality rating of 5.7 and intrinsic value of $108.4 reflect its solid fundamentals. Chevron’s revenue $192.4B and free cash flow $10.5B are complemented by a strong gross margin 28.3% and a conservative debt profile (21.9% debt-to-equity). Despite a slight revenue decline -0.8%, Chevron’s operational efficiency and capital return programs position it as a core holding for energy exposure.
Key Catalysts
- Shareholder-friendly capital allocation (dividends, buybacks)
- Expansion in renewable and alternative energy assets
- High gross margin and disciplined cost structure
- Strategic upstream and downstream integration
Risk Factors
- Negative ROIC -2.8% indicating recent capital deployment challenges
- Sensitivity to commodity price cycles
- Slower revenue growth environment
- Geopolitical risks in key operating regions
Stock #3: Shell plc (SHEL)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $222.8B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $107.1 |
| 1Y Return | 13.3% |
| Revenue | $272.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $28.7B |
| Revenue Growth | (9.9%) |
| FCF margin | 10.5% |
| Gross margin | 18.5% |
| ROIC | 10.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 41.3% |
Investment Thesis
Shell, with a $222.8B market cap, is a diversified energy major showing a strong 1-year return of 13.3%. The company’s quality rating of 6.2 and intrinsic value of $107.1 highlight its attractive risk-reward profile. Shell’s revenue $272.0B and industry-leading free cash flow $28.7B are supported by a healthy FCF margin 10.5% and a robust ROIC 10.5%. The company’s strategic pivot towards renewables and LNG positions it for long-term growth amid the energy transition.
Key Catalysts
- Accelerated investment in renewable energy and LNG
- Strong free cash flow generation
- High ROIC and improving capital efficiency
- Positive market sentiment on energy transition leaders
Risk Factors
- Elevated debt-to-equity ratio 41.3%
- Revenue contraction (-9.9% YoY)
- Volatility in global energy demand and pricing
- Regulatory uncertainties in key markets
Stock #4: TotalEnergies SE (TTE)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $137.1B |
| Quality Rating | 5.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $91.3 |
| 1Y Return | 0.8% |
| Revenue | $187.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | $11.4B |
| Revenue Growth | (10.7%) |
| FCF margin | 6.1% |
| Gross margin | 20.1% |
| ROIC | 8.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 52.3% |
Investment Thesis
TotalEnergies, valued at $137.1B, offers a balanced approach to traditional and renewable energy. With a quality rating of 5.5 and an intrinsic value of $91.3, the stock presents a stable option for diversified energy exposure. The company’s revenue $187.7B, free cash flow $11.4B, and FCF margin 6.1% reflect operational resilience. TotalEnergies’ focus on decarbonization and global expansion supports its long-term outlook.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion into renewables and clean energy
- Consistent free cash flow generation
- Strategic global asset portfolio
- Commitment to shareholder returns
Risk Factors
- High debt-to-equity ratio 52.3%
- Revenue decline (-10.7% YoY)
- Exposure to European regulatory changes
- Moderate quality rating versus peers
Stock #5: ConocoPhillips (COP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $111.7B |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $113.5 |
| 1Y Return | -17.6% |
| Revenue | $58.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $6,923.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 3.5% |
| FCF margin | 11.9% |
| Gross margin | 28.7% |
| ROIC | 9.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 35.9% |
Investment Thesis
ConocoPhillips, with a $111.7B market cap, is a leading independent E&P company. Despite a -17.6% 1-year return, the company’s quality rating of 5.9 and intrinsic value of $113.5 indicate potential upside. ConocoPhillips boasts a strong gross margin 28.7%, FCF margin 11.9%, and a healthy ROIC 9.3%. Its focus on capital discipline and asset optimization supports future growth.
Key Catalysts
- High-margin asset base and operational efficiency
- Strategic portfolio optimization
- Strong free cash flow and capital returns
- Positive revenue growth (3.5% YoY)
Risk Factors
- Volatile earnings due to commodity price swings
- Elevated debt-to-equity 35.9%
- Recent underperformance in share price
- Sector-specific regulatory risks
Stock #6: Enbridge Inc. (ENB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $101.6B |
| Quality Rating | 5.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $75.2 |
| 1Y Return | 18.9% |
| Revenue | CA$64.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | CA$4,631.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 48.5% |
| FCF margin | 7.2% |
| Gross margin | 32.6% |
| ROIC | 5.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 147.8% |
Investment Thesis
Enbridge, with a $101.6B market cap, is a North American energy infrastructure leader. The company’s quality rating of 5.4 and intrinsic value of $75.2 reflect its stable cash flows and defensive business model. Enbridge’s revenue CA$64.5B and free cash flow CA$4,631M are supported by a high gross margin 32.6% and impressive revenue growth (48.5% YoY). The company’s high debt-to-equity ratio 147.8% is a key consideration.
Key Catalysts
- Strong infrastructure footprint and regulated assets
- High gross margin and revenue growth
- Stable cash flow from long-term contracts
- Expansion into renewable energy infrastructure
Risk Factors
- Elevated leverage (debt-to-equity 147.8%)
- Regulatory and environmental scrutiny
- Currency risk (CAD exposure)
- Moderate quality rating
Stock #7: Sea Limited (SE)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $92.5B |
| Quality Rating | 7.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $124.0 |
| 1Y Return | 66.1% |
| Revenue | $19.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,347.7M |
| Revenue Growth | 34.1% |
| FCF margin | 22.4% |
| Gross margin | 45.0% |
| ROIC | 11.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 42.8% |
Investment Thesis
Sea Limited, with a $92.5B market cap, is a leading digital economy platform in Southeast Asia and Latin America. The company’s quality rating of 7.5 and intrinsic value of $124.0 highlight its strong growth profile. Sea’s revenue $19.4B, free cash flow $4,347.7M, and high FCF margin 22.4% reflect robust business momentum. The company’s 66.1% 1-year return and 34.1% revenue growth underscore its leadership in e-commerce, gaming, and fintech.
Key Catalysts
- Rapid expansion in digital financial services
- Strong revenue and free cash flow growth
- High gross margin 45.0% and ROIC 11.4%
- Market leadership in high-growth regions
Risk Factors
- Elevated debt-to-equity 42.8%
- Competitive pressures in core markets
- Execution risk in scaling new verticals
- Valuation sensitivity to growth expectations
Stock #8: Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $92.3B |
| Quality Rating | 5.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $61.0 |
| 1Y Return | -16.3% |
| Revenue | $37.2B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,516.2M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.8% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% |
| Gross margin | 22.9% |
| ROIC | 9.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | (329.0%) |
Investment Thesis
Starbucks, with a $92.3B market cap, is a global leader in specialty coffee retail. The company’s quality rating of 5.5 and intrinsic value of $61.0 suggest a balanced risk-reward profile. Despite a -16.3% 1-year return, Starbucks maintains steady revenue $37.2B and free cash flow $1,516.2M. The company’s gross margin 22.9% and ROIC 9.8% reflect operational efficiency, though its negative debt-to-equity ratio -329.0% signals a leveraged balance sheet.
Key Catalysts
- Global brand strength and customer loyalty
- Expansion in international markets
- Innovation in product offerings and digital channels
- Resilient business model in consumer staples
Risk Factors
- High leverage (negative debt-to-equity)
- Slower revenue growth (2.8% YoY)
- Margin pressures from inflation and labor costs
- Competitive landscape in foodservice
Stock #9: BP p.l.c. (BP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $91.6B |
| Quality Rating | 5.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $31.0 |
| 1Y Return | 23.3% |
| Revenue | $187.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $8,611.6M |
| Revenue Growth | (7.2%) |
| FCF margin | 4.6% |
| Gross margin | 16.2% |
| ROIC | 6.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 94.0% |
Investment Thesis
BP, with a $91.6B market cap, is a diversified energy company with a strong 1-year return of 23.3%. The company’s quality rating of 5.1 and intrinsic value of $31.0 indicate moderate upside potential. BP’s revenue $187.1B, free cash flow $8,611.6M, and gross margin 16.2% are balanced by a high debt-to-equity ratio 94.0%. The company’s focus on renewables and energy transition supports its long-term strategy.
Key Catalysts
- Accelerated investment in low-carbon energy
- Strong recent share price performance
- Strategic asset divestitures and portfolio optimization
- Positive FCF and capital returns
Risk Factors
- High leverage and debt servicing costs
- Revenue decline (-7.2% YoY)
- Regulatory and ESG headwinds
- Margin compression in legacy businesses
Stock #10: Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $77.7B |
| Quality Rating | 7.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $82.8 |
| 1Y Return | 6.8% |
| Revenue | $12.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $3,657.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 27.6% |
| FCF margin | 29.5% |
| Gross margin | 43.6% |
| ROIC | 37.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 312.7% |
Investment Thesis
Nu Holdings, with a $77.7B market cap, is a fintech disruptor in Latin America. The company’s quality rating of 7.1 and intrinsic value of $82.8 highlight its strong fundamentals. Nu’s revenue $12.4B, free cash flow $3,657.0M, and exceptional FCF margin 29.5% reflect its scalable business model. The company’s 6.8% 1-year return and 27.6% revenue growth position it as a leader in digital banking.
Key Catalysts
- Rapid customer acquisition and market share gains
- High gross margin 43.6% and industry-leading ROIC 37.0%
- Expansion into new financial products and geographies
- Strong brand and technology platform
Risk Factors
- Very high debt-to-equity ratio 312.7%
- Regulatory risks in emerging markets
- Competitive pressures from incumbents and new entrants
- Sensitivity to macroeconomic volatility
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist offers broad sector exposure across energy, infrastructure, technology, consumer, and fintech. The energy sector dominates, providing stability and cash flow, while growth-oriented picks like Sea Limited and Nu Holdings add upside potential. Enbridge and Starbucks diversify geographic and industry risk, balancing cyclical and defensive characteristics. The mix of high-quality, undervalued, and growth stocks supports a resilient, diversified portfolio for 2025.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given the cyclical nature of energy and the growth trajectories of fintech and tech, staggered entry and dollar-cost averaging may help mitigate volatility. Investors may consider monitoring sector rotation signals, macroeconomic data, and company-specific catalysts (such as earnings releases or regulatory changes) to optimize entry points. ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools and backtesting features can further refine timing strategies[1][2].
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screeners, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, and key financial metrics to identify undervalued opportunities with strong fundamentals[1][2].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
No single stock is universally “best”; each offers unique strengths. Sea Limited (SE) and Nu Holdings (NU) stand out for growth, while Shell (SHEL) and Exxon Mobil (XOM) provide stability and cash flow. The optimal choice depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is key to managing risk. This watchlist spans multiple sectors and geographies, allowing investors to build a balanced portfolio rather than concentrating on a single stock or industry.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector-specific volatility (especially in energy), high leverage for some companies, regulatory changes, and macroeconomic headwinds. Each stock’s risk profile is detailed in its analysis section.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing varies by stock and market conditions. Monitoring valuation metrics, sector trends, and company-specific catalysts—using ValueSense’s analysis tools—can help identify attractive entry points.