10 Best High Quality Smallmid Cap Stocks for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
This watchlist features a curated selection of high-quality, small-to-mid-cap stocks across technology, healthcare, industrials, consumer, and energy sectors—each chosen for robust fundamentals, strong growth, and attractive valuations. Our methodology leverages ValueSense’s proprietary quality and intrinsic value scores, emphasizing companies with high return on invested capital (ROIC), healthy free cash flow margins, and manageable debt levels. We also consider recent performance, sector diversification, and unique business catalysts. This approach aims to balance growth potential with risk management, offering a foundation for a resilient, diversified portfolio.
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.8B |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $98.4 |
| 1Y Return | 56.0% |
| Revenue | $2,161.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | $272.9M |
| Revenue Growth | 12.6% |
| FCF margin | 12.6% |
| Gross margin | 40.8% |
| ROIC | 11.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 19.4% |
Investment Thesis
SPX Technologies stands out with a $10.8 billion market cap, a quality rating of 7.0, and an intrinsic value estimate of $98.4. The company has delivered a remarkable 56% one-year return, underpinned by 12.6% revenue growth and a solid 11.5% ROIC. Its free cash flow margin of 12.6% and gross margin of 40.8% reflect efficient operations, while a low total debt-to-equity ratio of 19.4% signals financial stability. SPXC’s consistent execution and balanced capital structure position it as a reliable compounder in the industrial sector.
Key Catalysts
- Strong revenue and free cash flow growth
- High gross margins for an industrial company
- Low leverage enhances financial flexibility
- Consistent ROIC above industry averages
Risk Factors
- Exposure to cyclical end markets
- Potential margin pressure from input costs
- Integration risks from acquisitions
Stock #2: BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.3B |
| Quality Rating | 6.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $56.8 |
| 1Y Return | -18.7% |
| Revenue | $3,094.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $831.4M |
| Revenue Growth | 12.5% |
| FCF margin | 26.9% |
| Gross margin | 81.3% |
| ROIC | 14.7% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 9.9% |
Investment Thesis
BioMarin, a $10.3 billion biotech, combines a quality rating of 6.7 with an intrinsic value of $56.8. Despite a challenging year (-18.7% 1Y return), the company boasts an 81.3% gross margin and a 14.7% ROIC, highlighting its premium positioning in rare disease therapeutics. Revenue growth of 12.5% and a free cash flow margin of 26.9% demonstrate strong commercial execution, while a conservative 9.9% debt-to-equity ratio provides a cushion against volatility.
Key Catalysts
- Leading portfolio in rare genetic diseases
- Robust gross and free cash flow margins
- Pipeline of innovative therapies
- Low debt levels support R&D investment
Risk Factors
- Regulatory risks for drug approvals
- High dependence on a few key products
- Biotech sector sentiment swings
Stock #3: Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.2B |
| Quality Rating | 7.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $23.8 |
| 1Y Return | 141.4% |
| Revenue | $2,013.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | $119.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 88.7% |
| FCF margin | 5.9% |
| Gross margin | 76.2% |
| ROIC | 43.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 185.6% |
Investment Thesis
Hims & Hers is a high-growth digital health platform with a $10.2 billion market cap and a top-tier quality rating of 7.4. Its intrinsic value of $23.8 is supported by explosive 88.7% revenue growth and a 43.2% ROIC, among the highest in our screen. Gross margins of 76.2% and a 141.4% one-year return underscore its scalable, asset-light model. However, a high debt-to-equity ratio of 185.6% warrants caution.
Key Catalysts
- Rapid top-line expansion
- Exceptional ROIC and gross margins
- Digital-first, subscription-driven model
- Expanding product portfolio
Risk Factors
- Elevated leverage
- Intense competition in telehealth
- Customer acquisition cost pressures
Stock #4: Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,706.9M |
| Quality Rating | 6.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $196.8 |
| 1Y Return | 11.4% |
| Revenue | $4,664.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $455.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 4.0% |
| FCF margin | 9.8% |
| Gross margin | 30.4% |
| ROIC | 17.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 30.4% |
Investment Thesis
AIT, with a $9.7 billion market cap and a 6.9 quality rating, offers an intrinsic value of $196.8. The company has delivered steady 4% revenue growth, a 17.1% ROIC, and a 9.8% free cash flow margin. Its 30.4% gross margin and moderate 30.4% debt-to-equity ratio reflect a balanced industrial distribution business with a focus on efficiency and shareholder returns.
Key Catalysts
- Consistent profitability and cash generation
- Strong ROIC in the industrial sector
- Prudent capital allocation
- Resilient end-market exposure
Risk Factors
- Moderate growth profile
- Cyclical industrial demand
- Margin compression from supply chain costs
Stock #5: Instacart (Maplebear Inc.) (CART)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,679.0M |
| Quality Rating | 7.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $61.9 |
| 1Y Return | -16.4% |
| Revenue | $3,546.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $779.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 10.5% |
| FCF margin | 22.0% |
| Gross margin | 74.8% |
| ROIC | 26.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 2.0% |
Investment Thesis
Instacart, valued at $9.7 billion, carries a 7.3 quality rating and an intrinsic value of $61.9. Despite a -16.4% one-year return, the company generates a 22% free cash flow margin and 74.8% gross margin, highlighting its asset-light, high-margin grocery platform. Revenue growth of 10.5% and a 26.9% ROIC signal efficient scaling, while minimal debt (2% debt-to-equity) provides flexibility.
Key Catalysts
- Leading online grocery platform
- High free cash flow conversion
- Low leverage
- Expanding partnerships and services
Risk Factors
- Competitive online grocery landscape
- Slowing growth post-pandemic
- Dependence on third-party retailers
Stock #6: MKS Instruments, Inc. (MKSI)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,657.3M |
| Quality Rating | 6.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $167.7 |
| 1Y Return | 45.3% |
| Revenue | $3,740.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $525.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 4.5% |
| FCF margin | 14.0% |
| Gross margin | 47.3% |
| ROIC | 7.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 184.0% |
Investment Thesis
MKS Instruments, a $9.7 billion semiconductor equipment provider, has a 6.7 quality rating and an intrinsic value of $167.7. The company posted a 45.3% one-year return, 4.5% revenue growth, and a 14% free cash flow margin. Its 47.3% gross margin and 7.2% ROIC reflect solid positioning in a cyclical but essential industry, though high leverage (184% debt-to-equity) is a notable concern.
Key Catalysts
- Exposure to semiconductor growth
- Strong free cash flow generation
- Technological leadership in precision instruments
Risk Factors
- High debt load
- Cyclical end markets
- Integration risks from acquisitions
Stock #7: Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,557.3M |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $17.5 |
| 1Y Return | 67.7% |
| Revenue | $1,452.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $72.9M |
| Revenue Growth | 29.8% |
| FCF margin | 5.0% |
| Gross margin | 26.7% |
| ROIC | 7.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 94.0% |
Investment Thesis
Dutch Bros, a $9.6 billion coffee chain, boasts a 7.0 quality rating and an intrinsic value of $17.5. The company’s 29.8% revenue growth and 67.7% one-year return highlight its rapid expansion, though free cash flow margin is modest at 5%. Gross margins of 26.7% and a 7.9% ROIC reflect the capital-intensive nature of retail, while a 94% debt-to-equity ratio indicates aggressive growth financing.
Key Catalysts
- Rapid unit growth and brand momentum
- Attractive same-store sales trends
- Loyal customer base
Risk Factors
- High leverage
- Intense coffee shop competition
- Execution risk in expansion
Stock #8: Antero Resources Corporation (AR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,543.9M |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $22.5 |
| 1Y Return | 19.4% |
| Revenue | $4,999.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,538.2M |
| Revenue Growth | 17.3% |
| FCF margin | 30.8% |
| Gross margin | 74.6% |
| ROIC | 7.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 70.8% |
Investment Thesis
Antero Resources, a $9.5 billion energy producer, has a 6.4 quality rating and an intrinsic value of $22.5. The company delivered 19.4% one-year returns, 17.3% revenue growth, and a remarkable 30.8% free cash flow margin. Gross margins of 74.6% and a 7.4% ROIC reflect strong commodity pricing, though a 70.8% debt-to-equity ratio and sector volatility are key considerations.
Key Catalysts
- High free cash flow yield
- Leverage to natural gas prices
- Efficient operations
Risk Factors
- Commodity price volatility
- Environmental and regulatory risks
- Moderate ROIC for the sector
Stock #9: Alcoa Corporation (AA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,523.3M |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $85.8 |
| 1Y Return | -7.9% |
| Revenue | $12.8B |
| Free Cash Flow | $651.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 16.1% |
| FCF margin | 5.1% |
| Gross margin | 14.9% |
| ROIC | 5.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 80.2% |
Investment Thesis
Alcoa, a $9.5 billion aluminum producer, has a 6.4 quality rating and an intrinsic value of $85.8. The company posted 16.1% revenue growth and a -7.9% one-year return, with a 5.1% free cash flow margin and 5.4% ROIC. Gross margins of 14.9% and an 80.2% debt-to-equity ratio highlight the capital-intensive, cyclical nature of the metals industry.
Key Catalysts
- Leverage to aluminum demand
- Cost-cutting initiatives
- Global infrastructure trends
Risk Factors
- High leverage
- Commodity price sensitivity
- Operational execution risks
Stock #10: Dillard's, Inc. (DDS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,421.3M |
| Quality Rating | 7.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $399.8 |
| 1Y Return | 70.9% |
| Revenue | $6,561.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $770.6M |
| Revenue Growth | (2.8%) |
| FCF margin | 11.7% |
| Gross margin | 38.5% |
| ROIC | 39.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 28.7% |
Investment Thesis
Dillard’s, a $9.4 billion department store chain, carries a 7.2 quality rating and an intrinsic value of $399.8. Despite a -2.8% revenue decline, the company delivered a 70.9% one-year return, an 11.7% free cash flow margin, and a stellar 39.4% ROIC. Gross margins of 38.5% and a 28.7% debt-to-equity ratio reflect efficient operations and prudent capital management in a challenging retail environment.
Key Catalysts
- Exceptional ROIC and free cash flow
- Conservative balance sheet
- Shareholder-friendly capital returns
Risk Factors
- Declining revenue
- Retail sector headwinds
- Limited growth avenues
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans technology (CART, MKSI), healthcare (BMRN, HIMS), industrials (SPXC, AIT), consumer (BROS, DDS), and energy (AR, AA), offering broad sector exposure. High-growth names like HIMS and BROS balance steadier compounders such as SPXC and AIT, while commodity plays (AR, AA) and a turnaround story (DDS) add cyclical diversification. Such a mix aims to reduce concentration risk and capture opportunities across economic cycles.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given the mix of growth, value, and cyclicality, investors may consider dollar-cost averaging into these positions, especially during market pullbacks or sector-specific weakness. For high-momentum stocks (e.g., HIMS, BROS), technical pullbacks to key support levels could offer attractive entry points. For steady compounders (SPXC, AIT), gradual accumulation aligns with long-term holding periods. Energy and metals (AR, AA) may benefit from macroeconomic trends, while retail (DDS) and biotech (BMRN) require close monitoring of company-specific catalysts.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen based on ValueSense’s proprietary quality and intrinsic value scores, emphasizing strong fundamentals, growth, and reasonable valuations. Sector diversification and recent performance were also key factors.
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
There is no single “best” stock—each offers unique risk/reward profiles. HIMS and SPXC stand out for growth and quality, while DDS and BMRN offer value and stability. Portfolio construction should reflect individual goals and risk tolerance.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is generally recommended to manage risk. This list is designed to provide a starting point for building a balanced portfolio across sectors and market caps.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector cyclicality, high leverage in some names, competitive pressures, and macroeconomic uncertainty. Always review each company’s specific risk factors before investing.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Consider gradual entry during market volatility or sector weakness. Dollar-cost averaging and periodic portfolio rebalancing can help manage timing risk.
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. For deeper analysis, visit ValueSense and explore our intrinsic value tools and stock screening features[3][4].