10 Best Horizontal Saas for October 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market landscape is characterized by heightened volatility, sector rotation, and a renewed focus on fundamentals. Our selection methodology prioritizes companies with strong intrinsic value, robust free cash flow, and resilient margins across technology, SaaS, utilities, and innovation-driven sectors. Each stock is evaluated using ValueSense’s proprietary quality rating, intrinsic value estimates, and key financial metrics, ensuring a diversified and data-driven watchlist. This approach is designed to surface undervalued stocks with growth potential and to provide a balanced risk profile for investors seeking both stability and upside.
Featured Stock Analysis
NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.4B |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $124.0 |
| 1Y Return | -2.7% |
| Revenue | $6,588.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,658.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 3.3% |
| FCF margin | 25.2% |
| Gross margin | 70.0% |
| ROIC | 27.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 281.5% |
Investment Thesis
NetApp, Inc. is a leading provider of hybrid cloud data services and data management solutions. With a market cap of $24.4B and a quality rating of 7.0, NetApp stands out for its operational efficiency and strong free cash flow generation. The company’s intrinsic value is estimated at $124.0, indicating potential undervaluation relative to current market sentiment. Despite a modest 1-year return of -2.7%, NetApp’s fundamentals remain robust, supported by $6,588M in revenue and a 25.2% FCF margin.
Key Catalysts
- High gross margin of 70.0% supports profitability.
- ROIC of 27.5% reflects efficient capital allocation.
- Ongoing digital transformation trends drive demand for data management solutions.
- Strong free cash flow enables strategic investments and shareholder returns.
Risk Factors
- Elevated total debt to equity 281.5% could constrain financial flexibility.
- Slower revenue growth 3.3% compared to peers.
- Competitive pressures in the cloud and storage markets.
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.5B |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $214.5 |
| 1Y Return | -18.7% |
| Revenue | $2,847.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | $669.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 19.0% |
| FCF margin | 23.5% |
| Gross margin | 84.6% |
| ROIC | (8.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 13.6% |
Investment Thesis
HubSpot, Inc. is a premier SaaS provider specializing in inbound marketing, sales, and customer service platforms. With a market cap of $23.5B and a quality rating of 6.0, HubSpot’s revenue growth of 19.0% underscores its leadership in the digital marketing ecosystem. The company’s intrinsic value is $214.5, and it boasts a gross margin of 84.6%, highlighting its scalable business model. Despite a 1-year return of -18.7%, HubSpot’s fundamentals remain compelling for long-term growth investors.
Key Catalysts
- Strong free cash flow $669.5M and 23.5% FCF margin.
- Expanding product suite and international footprint.
- High customer retention and upsell opportunities.
Risk Factors
- Negative ROIC -8.3% signals ongoing investment phase.
- Total debt to equity 13.6% is manageable but warrants monitoring.
- Market saturation and competition from larger SaaS players.
CMS Energy Corporation (CMS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.5B |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $47.5 |
| 1Y Return | 8.8% |
| Revenue | $8,017.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,095.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 8.3% |
| FCF margin | 13.7% |
| Gross margin | 42.1% |
| ROIC | 4.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 201.1% |
Investment Thesis
CMS Energy Corporation is a diversified utility company with a market cap of $22.5B and a quality rating of 6.1. The company’s intrinsic value is $47.5, and it has delivered a 1-year return of 8.8%, outperforming many peers in the sector. CMS Energy’s revenue of $8,017M and free cash flow of $1,095M reflect its stable cash generation, while its 8.3% revenue growth demonstrates resilience in a defensive sector.
Key Catalysts
- Consistent FCF margin 13.7% and gross margin 42.1%.
- ROIC of 4.8% supports steady value creation.
- Ongoing investments in renewable energy and grid modernization.
Risk Factors
- High total debt to equity 201.1% increases leverage risk.
- Regulatory changes could impact profitability.
- Modest growth profile compared to technology peers.
CGI Inc. (GIB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.2B |
| Quality Rating | 5.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $140.3 |
| 1Y Return | -24.9% |
| Revenue | CA$15.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | CA$1,935.3M |
| Revenue Growth | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% |
| Gross margin | 16.3% |
| ROIC | 4.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 41.6% |
Investment Thesis
CGI Inc. is a global IT and business consulting services firm with a market cap of $19.2B and a quality rating of 5.4. The company’s intrinsic value is $140.3, and it reported CA$15.5B in revenue. Despite a 1-year return of -24.9%, CGI’s 7.0% revenue growth and strong free cash flow generation position it well for a rebound as digital transformation accelerates globally.
Key Catalysts
- Free cash flow of CA$1,935.3M and 12.5% FCF margin.
- Expanding global client base and digital services portfolio.
- Low total debt to equity 41.6% supports balance sheet strength.
Risk Factors
- Lower gross margin 16.3% compared to SaaS peers.
- ROIC of 4.8% indicates moderate capital efficiency.
- Currency fluctuations and international exposure.
GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18.1B |
| Quality Rating | 7.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $190.2 |
| 1Y Return | -20.1% |
| Revenue | $4,751.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,453.2M |
| Revenue Growth | 8.0% |
| FCF margin | 30.6% |
| Gross margin | 63.3% |
| ROIC | 19.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 959.9% |
Investment Thesis
GoDaddy Inc. is a leading domain registration and web hosting company with a market cap of $18.1B and a quality rating of 7.2. The company’s intrinsic value is $190.2, and it generates $4,751.4M in revenue. Despite a 1-year return of -20.1%, GoDaddy’s 30.6% FCF margin and gross margin of 63.3% highlight its operational leverage and recurring revenue model.
Key Catalysts
- Strong free cash flow $1,453.2M supports reinvestment and buybacks.
- ROIC of 19.0% demonstrates efficient capital deployment.
- Growth in digital presence and SMB adoption.
Risk Factors
- Extremely high total debt to equity 959.9% raises financial risk.
- Slower revenue growth 8.0% relative to SaaS peers.
- Intense competition in web services and hosting.
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,799.7M |
| Quality Rating | 5.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $0.7 |
| 1Y Return | -7.4% |
| Revenue | $1,000.0K |
| Free Cash Flow | ($601.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | N/A |
| FCF margin | (60,100.0%) |
| Gross margin | (4,000.0%) |
| ROIC | (100.2%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 5.6% |
Investment Thesis
Aurora Innovation, Inc. is an autonomous vehicle technology company with a market cap of $9.8B and a quality rating of 5.3. The company’s intrinsic value is $0.7, and it is currently in a pre-revenue phase with $1M in revenue. The 1-year return is -7.4%, reflecting the speculative nature of early-stage innovation plays.
Key Catalysts
- Leadership in autonomous driving technology.
- Strategic partnerships with major OEMs.
- Large addressable market in mobility and logistics.
Risk Factors
- Negative free cash flow -$601M and extreme FCF margin -60,100%.
- Gross margin -4,000% and ROIC -100.2% highlight high burn rate.
- Execution risk and long commercialization timeline.
Applied Digital Corporation (APLD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,662.5M |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $1.5 |
| 1Y Return | 417.3% |
| Revenue | $219.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($573.7M) |
| Revenue Growth | 36.0% |
| FCF margin | (261.9%) |
| Gross margin | 14.5% |
| ROIC | (6.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 63.2% |
Investment Thesis
Applied Digital Corporation operates in the digital infrastructure and data center sector, with a market cap of $9.7B and a quality rating of 6.1. The company’s intrinsic value is $1.5, and it has delivered a remarkable 1-year return of 417.3%. With $219M in revenue and 36.0% revenue growth, APLD is positioned as a high-growth, high-volatility opportunity.
Key Catalysts
- Rapid expansion in digital infrastructure demand.
- Strong top-line growth and market momentum.
- Strategic partnerships in AI and cloud computing.
Risk Factors
- Negative free cash flow -$573.7M and FCF margin -261.9%.
- Low gross margin 14.5% and negative ROIC -6.7%.
- Total debt to equity 63.2% indicates moderate leverage.
UiPath Inc. (PATH)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,948.7M |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $27.0 |
| 1Y Return | 29.7% |
| Revenue | $1,496.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | $309.6M |
| Revenue Growth | 8.3% |
| FCF margin | 20.7% |
| Gross margin | 82.9% |
| ROIC | (6.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 4.4% |
Investment Thesis
UiPath Inc. is a leader in robotic process automation (RPA) with a market cap of $8.9B and a quality rating of 5.9. The company’s intrinsic value is $27.0, and it has achieved a 1-year return of 29.7%. UiPath’s $1,496.7M in revenue and 8.3% revenue growth reflect its strong position in the automation software market.
Key Catalysts
- High gross margin 82.9% and FCF margin 20.7%.
- Expanding enterprise adoption of automation.
- Low total debt to equity 4.4% supports financial stability.
Risk Factors
- Negative ROIC -6.3% due to ongoing investments.
- Competitive pressures from larger software vendors.
- Need for continued innovation to maintain growth.
ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,582.5M |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $4,001.0 |
| 1Y Return | -6.7% |
| Revenue | $866.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | $24.7B |
| Revenue Growth | 24.4% |
| FCF margin | 2,849.1% |
| Gross margin | 67.9% |
| ROIC | (0.0%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 3.7% |
Investment Thesis
ServiceTitan, Inc. is a SaaS platform for the trades industry, with a market cap of $8.6B and a quality rating of 5.8. The company’s intrinsic value is $4,001.0, and it reported $866.4M in revenue. Despite a 1-year return of -6.7%, ServiceTitan’s 24.4% revenue growth and extraordinary FCF margin 2,849.1% reflect its unique business model and strong cash generation.
Key Catalysts
- Rapid adoption in the home services sector.
- High gross margin 67.9% supports profitability.
- Scalable SaaS platform with recurring revenue.
Risk Factors
- Negative ROIC 0.0% suggests reinvestment phase.
- Low total debt to equity 3.7% but needs monitoring as company scales.
- Market fragmentation and competition.
Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,290.6M |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $178.1 |
| 1Y Return | -11.3% |
| Revenue | $1,595.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $324.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 13.7% |
| FCF margin | 20.3% |
| Gross margin | 68.8% |
| ROIC | 32.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 17.7% |
Investment Thesis
Paylocity Holding Corporation is a cloud-based payroll and HR solutions provider with a market cap of $8.3B and a quality rating of 7.0. The company’s intrinsic value is $178.1, and it has delivered $1,595.2M in revenue with a 13.7% revenue growth. Despite a 1-year return of -11.3%, Paylocity’s 32.2% ROIC and 20.3% FCF margin highlight its operational excellence.
Key Catalysts
- High gross margin 68.8% and strong free cash flow $324M.
- Expanding client base in the mid-market segment.
- Ongoing innovation in HR tech and automation.
Risk Factors
- Moderate total debt to equity 17.7%.
- Competitive landscape in payroll software.
- Need for continued product differentiation.
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans technology, SaaS, utilities, and innovation sectors, providing a blend of growth, stability, and speculative upside. Technology and SaaS names (NTAP, HUBS, GDDY, PATH, TTAN, PCTY) offer exposure to digital transformation and automation trends, while CMS Energy adds defensive ballast. High-growth and speculative picks like AUR and APLD introduce potential for outsized returns but increase volatility. The portfolio’s sector allocation enables risk balancing and cross-cycle resilience.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given current market volatility, staggered entry strategies such as dollar-cost averaging can help mitigate timing risk. Investors may consider entering positions on pullbacks or during sector rotations, especially for high-growth and speculative names. For defensive stocks like CMS, steady accumulation may be appropriate. Monitoring earnings reports, macroeconomic indicators, and sector trends is essential for optimizing entry points.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- 10 Best Consumer Saas for October 2025
- 10 Best B2b Saas for October 2025
- 10 Best Undervalued High Quality Stocks for October 2025
- 10 Best Stock Picks Under $10 for November 2025
- 10 Best Data Center Stock Picks for Q4 2025
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screening, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, financial strength, and sector diversification based on the latest available data.
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
No single stock is universally “best”; each offers unique strengths. For example, Paylocity (PCTY) and NetApp (NTAP) score high on quality and operational efficiency, while Applied Digital (APLD) stands out for recent growth.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors and risk profiles is generally favored for educational purposes, as it helps balance potential returns and volatility.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector-specific headwinds, high leverage (e.g., GDDY, CMS), negative free cash flow (AUR, APLD), and competitive pressures in technology and SaaS.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing depends on market conditions, sector trends, and individual risk tolerance. Staggered entries and monitoring for pullbacks can help manage timing risk.