10 Best Nano Cap for November 2025

10 Best Nano Cap for November 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The current market landscape is characterized by heightened volatility and a renewed focus on fundamentals, especially among small-cap and nano-cap stocks. Our selection methodology leverages ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and deep-dive financial metrics to identify stocks with strong value propositions, robust margins, and unique sector catalysts. Each stock featured below is screened for undervaluation, growth potential, and sector diversity, ensuring a balanced and opportunity-rich watchlist[1][2].

Stock #1: Plus Therapeutics, Inc. (PSTV)

MetricValue
Market Cap$58.3M
Quality Rating5.7
Intrinsic Value$0.4
1Y Return-58.9%
Revenue$2,449.0K
Free Cash Flow($15.8M)
Revenue Growth(42.6%)
FCF margin(644.2%)
Gross margin89.1%
ROIC559.5%
Total Debt to Equity0.4%

Investment Thesis

Plus Therapeutics, Inc. is a nano-cap biotech company focused on innovative therapies, with a market cap of $58.3M. Despite a challenging year with a -58.9% return, the company boasts a high gross margin of 89.1% and an impressive ROIC of 559.5%. Its intrinsic value is calculated at $0.4, suggesting the stock may be undervalued relative to its current price. The company’s low total debt to equity 0.4% indicates prudent financial management, and its quality rating of 5.7 is above the peer group average for this capitalization tier.

Key Catalysts

  • High gross margin supports potential for future profitability.
  • Strong ROIC signals efficient capital allocation.
  • Low leverage provides financial flexibility for R&D and growth initiatives.

Risk Factors

  • Negative revenue growth -42.6% and significant free cash flow deficit $15.8M.
  • Substantial 1-year share price decline, reflecting market skepticism.
  • High FCF margin -644.2% may limit near-term operational expansion.

Stock #2: MultiSensor AI Holdings, Inc. (MSAI)

MetricValue
Market Cap$52.3M
Quality Rating5.4
Intrinsic Value$3.8
1Y Return-19.6%
Revenue$5,591.0K
Free Cash Flow($22.2M)
Revenue Growth(25.6%)
FCF margin(397.4%)
Gross margin56.4%
ROIC(216.2%)
Total Debt to Equity0.6%

Investment Thesis

MultiSensor AI Holdings, Inc. operates in the technology sector, specializing in AI-driven solutions. With a $52.3M market cap and a quality rating of 5.4, MSAI’s intrinsic value stands at $3.8. The company’s revenue of $5.6M and gross margin of 56.4% highlight a scalable business model. Although the 1-year return is -19.6%, this is less severe than many nano-cap peers, and the company maintains moderate leverage (total debt to equity of 0.6%).

Key Catalysts

  • AI sector tailwinds and increasing demand for automation.
  • Healthy gross margin supports reinvestment in growth.
  • Intrinsic value suggests upside potential if operational improvements materialize.

Risk Factors

  • Negative revenue growth -25.6% and significant free cash flow deficit $22.2M.
  • High FCF margin -397.4% and negative ROIC -216.2% indicate ongoing operational challenges.
  • Market sentiment remains cautious, as reflected in recent share performance.

Stock #3: Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH)

MetricValue
Market Cap$52.3M
Quality Rating5.5
Intrinsic Value$8.8
1Y Return1.7%
Revenue$27.9M
Free Cash Flow($17.9M)
Revenue Growth(26.9%)
FCF margin(64.2%)
Gross margin64.8%
ROIC2.0%
Total Debt to Equity80.4%

Investment Thesis

Soluna Holdings, Inc. is positioned at the intersection of technology and energy, with a market cap of $52.3M. The company’s 1-year return of 1.7% stands out among nano-caps, and its revenue base of $27.9M is among the highest in this cohort. With a gross margin of 64.8% and a modestly positive ROIC 2.0%, Soluna demonstrates operational resilience. The intrinsic value of $8.8 suggests the stock may be undervalued.

Key Catalysts

  • Positive 1-year return and strong revenue base.
  • High gross margin and improving capital efficiency.
  • Exposure to renewable energy and technology convergence.

Risk Factors

  • High leverage (total debt to equity of 80.4%) increases financial risk.
  • Negative free cash flow $17.9M and FCF margin -64.2%.
  • Revenue growth remains negative -26.9%, requiring close monitoring.

Stock #4: Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. (PPSI)

MetricValue
Market Cap$51.1M
Quality Rating5.7
Intrinsic Value$13.9
1Y Return-0.9%
Revenue$23.1M
Free Cash Flow($12.7M)
Revenue Growth(35.6%)
FCF margin(55.0%)
Gross margin19.9%
ROIC(31.0%)
Total Debt to Equity2.6%

Investment Thesis

Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. is a diversified industrial company with a $51.1M market cap and a quality rating of 5.7. The company’s intrinsic value is $13.9, and it generates $23.1M in revenue. While the 1-year return is nearly flat -0.9%, Pioneer’s gross margin of 19.9% and manageable leverage (total debt to equity of 2.6%) provide a stable foundation for future growth.

Key Catalysts

  • Consistent revenue generation and stable gross margin.
  • Intrinsic value indicates potential undervaluation.
  • Industrial sector exposure offers cyclical upside.

Risk Factors

  • Negative revenue growth -35.6% and free cash flow deficit $12.7M.
  • FCF margin -55.0% and negative ROIC -31.0% highlight profitability challenges.
  • Market may require evidence of margin expansion for re-rating.

Stock #5: Airgain, Inc. (AIRG)

MetricValue
Market Cap$50.9M
Quality Rating4.9
Intrinsic Value$15.1
1Y Return-53.6%
Revenue$56.8M
Free Cash Flow($2,187.0K)
Revenue Growth6.8%
FCF margin(3.8%)
Gross margin42.4%
ROIC(30.3%)
Total Debt to Equity27.3%

Investment Thesis

Airgain, Inc. is a technology hardware company with a $50.9M market cap and a quality rating of 4.9. The company’s intrinsic value of $15.1 and revenue of $56.8M are notable, with positive revenue growth 6.8% distinguishing it from many peers. Gross margin stands at 42.4%, and leverage is moderate (total debt to equity of 27.3%).

Key Catalysts

  • Positive revenue growth and strong revenue base.
  • Attractive intrinsic value relative to current market cap.
  • Technology sector positioning with potential for innovation-driven upside.

Risk Factors

  • 1-year return of -53.6% reflects market concerns.
  • Free cash flow deficit $2.2M and negative ROIC -30.3%.
  • FCF margin -3.8% requires improvement for sustainable growth.

Stock #6: AEye, Inc. (LIDR)

MetricValue
Market Cap$50.7M
Quality Rating5.5
Intrinsic Value$1.2
1Y Return147.7%
Revenue$236.0K
Free Cash Flow($34.6M)
Revenue Growth(23.6%)
FCF margin(14,672.5%)
Gross margin(136.9%)
ROIC967.8%
Total Debt to Equity24.6%

Investment Thesis

AEye, Inc. is a leading player in lidar technology, with a $50.7M market cap and a quality rating of 5.5. The company’s 1-year return of 147.7% is exceptional, reflecting strong investor interest. Although revenue is modest $236K, the company’s intrinsic value of $1.2 and high ROIC 967.8% suggest significant potential if commercial traction accelerates.

Key Catalysts

  • Outstanding 1-year return and sector leadership in lidar.
  • High ROIC and innovative technology platform.
  • Intrinsic value supports further upside if revenue growth materializes.

Risk Factors

  • Very low revenue base and negative gross margin -136.9%.
  • Large free cash flow deficit $34.6M and extreme FCF margin -14,672.5%.
  • High leverage (total debt to equity of 24.6%) and operational losses.

Stock #7: ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH)

MetricValue
Market Cap$50.7M
Quality Rating5.0
Intrinsic Value$13.7
1Y Return-44.9%
Revenue$6,166.0K
Free Cash Flow($75.9M)
Revenue Growth(17.0%)
FCF margin(1,231.0%)
Gross margin(629.5%)
ROIC(330.4%)
Total Debt to Equity26.4%

Investment Thesis

ESS Tech, Inc. operates in the energy storage sector, with a $50.7M market cap and a quality rating of 5.0. The company’s intrinsic value is $13.7, and it reported $6.2M in revenue. Despite a -44.9% 1-year return, ESS Tech’s sector exposure and innovation pipeline could drive future growth.

Key Catalysts

  • Intrinsic value suggests significant upside.
  • Energy storage market is poised for long-term expansion.
  • Gross margin improvement could catalyze re-rating.

Risk Factors

  • Negative revenue growth -17.0% and large free cash flow deficit $75.9M.
  • Negative gross margin -629.5% and ROIC -330.4%.
  • High leverage (total debt to equity of 26.4%) and operational headwinds.

Stock #8: Biodesix, Inc. (BDSX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$50.1M
Quality Rating5.1
Intrinsic Value$72.6
1Y Return301.8%
Revenue$76.6M
Free Cash Flow($31.3M)
Revenue Growth25.7%
FCF margin(40.9%)
Gross margin78.8%
ROIC(63.9%)
Total Debt to Equity8,458.0%

Investment Thesis

Biodesix, Inc. is a healthcare diagnostics company with a $50.1M market cap and a quality rating of 5.1. The company’s 1-year return of 301.8% is the highest in this collection, and its revenue of $76.6M is robust. The intrinsic value of $72.6 suggests substantial undervaluation, and a gross margin of 78.8% supports profitability.

Key Catalysts

  • Exceptional 1-year return and strong revenue growth 25.7%.
  • High gross margin and sector leadership in diagnostics.
  • Intrinsic value far exceeds current market cap.

Risk Factors

  • High leverage (total debt to equity of 8,458.0%) introduces financial risk.
  • Free cash flow deficit $31.3M and negative ROIC -63.9%.
  • FCF margin -40.9% requires improvement for long-term sustainability.

Stock #9: Serina Therapeutics, Inc. (SER)

MetricValue
Market Cap$50.0M
Quality Rating6.0
Intrinsic Value$0.6
1Y Return-26.7%
Revenue$144.0K
Free Cash Flow($15.6M)
Revenue Growth(19.6%)
FCF margin(10,854.9%)
Gross margin38.2%
ROIC4,608.9%
Total Debt to Equity11.2%

Investment Thesis

Serina Therapeutics, Inc. is a biotech innovator with a $50.0M market cap and the highest quality rating in this group 6.0. The company’s intrinsic value is $0.6, and it maintains a gross margin of 38.2%. Despite a -26.7% 1-year return, Serina’s ROIC of 4,608.9% is remarkable, reflecting efficient capital use in its niche.

Key Catalysts

  • Highest quality rating and extraordinary ROIC.
  • Biotech sector exposure with potential for breakthrough therapies.
  • Low leverage (total debt to equity of 11.2%).

Risk Factors

  • Very low revenue base $144K and negative revenue growth -19.6%.
  • Large free cash flow deficit $15.6M and extreme FCF margin -10,854.9%.
  • Market may require clinical or commercial milestones for re-rating.

Stock #10: Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO)

MetricValue
Market Cap$49.8M
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$269.8
1Y Return-21.3%
Revenue$8,640.3M
Free Cash Flow($10.3M)
Revenue Growth23,832.2%
FCF margin(0.1%)
Gross margin99.9%
ROIC(45.5%)
Total Debt to Equity338.7%

Investment Thesis

Cytosorbents Corporation is a healthcare company with a $49.8M market cap and a quality rating of 6.1. The company’s intrinsic value is $269.8, and it reported an extraordinary revenue figure of $8,640.3M, with revenue growth of 23,832.2%. Gross margin is nearly 100%, and the company’s focus on innovative blood purification technologies positions it for continued sector leadership.

Key Catalysts

  • Explosive revenue growth and near-perfect gross margin.
  • Highest intrinsic value in this collection.
  • Healthcare innovation and global market expansion.

Risk Factors

  • High leverage (total debt to equity of 338.7%) and negative ROIC -45.5%.
  • Free cash flow deficit $10.3M and FCF margin -0.1%.
  • Market may scrutinize sustainability of recent growth rates.

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This watchlist spans technology, healthcare, industrials, and energy, providing sectoral diversification and exposure to both growth and defensive themes. Healthcare and biotech names (BDSX, SER, CTSO, PSTV) offer innovation-driven upside, while technology and AI (MSAI, AIRG, LIDR) provide access to secular trends. Industrial and energy picks (PPSI, SLNH, GWH) balance the portfolio with cyclical and infrastructure-related opportunities. This blend helps mitigate sector-specific risks and enhances the potential for uncorrelated returns.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Given the volatility in nano-cap stocks, timing entries is crucial. Investors may consider dollar-cost averaging or waiting for technical confirmation of trend reversals. Monitoring earnings releases, sector news, and ValueSense’s intrinsic value updates can help refine entry points. For high-momentum names (BDSX, LIDR), momentum-based strategies may be appropriate, while deep value picks (PSTV, PPSI) could benefit from mean reversion or catalyst-driven entry.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screening tools, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, sector diversity, and key financial metrics to identify undervalued opportunities with growth potential[1][2].

Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; Biodesix, Inc. (BDSX) and AEye, Inc. (LIDR) stand out for their exceptional 1-year returns, while Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO) leads in revenue growth and intrinsic value. The "best" stock depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors and themes can help manage risk. This watchlist is structured to provide exposure to multiple industries, reducing the impact of sector-specific volatility.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include high leverage, negative free cash flow, and volatile share prices typical of nano-cap stocks. Investors should also consider sector-specific risks and the potential for operational setbacks.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing varies by stock and market conditions. Monitoring earnings, sector news, and ValueSense’s intrinsic value updates can help identify attractive entry points. Dollar-cost averaging and technical analysis may also be useful strategies.