10 Best Publishing for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market landscape is characterized by heightened volatility and sector rotation, with investors seeking resilient companies that demonstrate strong fundamentals and attractive valuations. Our selection methodology leverages ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and sector diversification to identify stocks with compelling risk/reward profiles. Each pick is screened for financial health, growth potential, and relative undervaluation, ensuring a balanced watchlist for educational analysis[1][2][3].
Featured Stock Analysis
News Corporation (NWS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.2B |
| Quality Rating | 6.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $18.5 |
| 1Y Return | 4.9% |
| Revenue | $8,933.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $571.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (11.4%) |
| FCF margin | 6.4% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% |
| ROIC | 7.7% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 31.3% |
Investment Thesis
News Corporation stands out as a leading global media and publishing conglomerate, with a market cap of $17.2B and a ValueSense quality rating of 6.7. Despite a modest 1-year return of 4.9%, the company’s intrinsic value is estimated at $18.5, suggesting potential undervaluation. Its robust gross margin of 100% and healthy free cash flow of $571M highlight operational efficiency, even as revenue growth has contracted by 11.4%. The company’s diversified revenue streams across news, digital real estate, and book publishing provide resilience in a shifting media landscape.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion in digital real estate and subscription services
- Strategic acquisitions and partnerships
- Cost optimization initiatives driving margin improvement
Risk Factors
- Declining traditional media revenues
- Exposure to cyclical advertising markets
- Moderate debt levels (Total Debt to Equity: 31.3%)
Pearson plc (PSO)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,311.2M |
| Quality Rating | 7.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $17.4 |
| 1Y Return | -4.7% |
| Revenue | £7,069.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | £1,140.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (6.4%) |
| FCF margin | 16.1% |
| Gross margin | 51.0% |
| ROIC | 28.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 41.6% |
Investment Thesis
Pearson plc, a global leader in education publishing, boasts a market cap of $9.3B and a ValueSense quality rating of 7.2. The stock’s intrinsic value is $17.4, indicating upside potential relative to current pricing. Despite a 1-year return of -4.7%, Pearson demonstrates strong free cash flow £1,140M and a high FCF margin 16.1%. Its gross margin of 51% and impressive ROIC of 28% reflect operational excellence. The company’s digital transformation and expansion into online learning platforms position it for long-term growth.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in digital education and online learning
- Strategic cost reductions and margin expansion
- Increased adoption of subscription-based models
Risk Factors
- Currency fluctuations impacting international revenue
- Competitive pressures in digital education
- Moderate leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 41.6%)
The New York Times Company (NYT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,308.2M |
| Quality Rating | 7.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $30.5 |
| 1Y Return | 2.3% |
| Revenue | $2,688.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $455.2M |
| Revenue Growth | 7.8% |
| FCF margin | 16.9% |
| Gross margin | 50.0% |
| ROIC | 24.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
The New York Times Company is a premier digital and print news provider with a market cap of $9.3B and the highest ValueSense quality rating in this list 7.8. Its intrinsic value is $30.5, and the stock has delivered a 1-year return of 2.3%. Revenue growth of 7.8% and a strong FCF margin 16.9% underscore its successful transition to digital subscriptions. With a gross margin of 50% and zero debt, NYT is well-positioned for sustainable growth and shareholder value creation.
Key Catalysts
- Continued growth in digital subscriptions
- Expansion of multimedia content offerings
- Strong brand and global reach
Risk Factors
- Intense competition in digital media
- Potential regulatory changes affecting news distribution
- Sensitivity to advertising market cycles
Informatica Inc. (INFA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7,530.9M |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $33.1 |
| 1Y Return | -8.9% |
| Revenue | $1,662.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $425.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 1.2% |
| FCF margin | 25.6% |
| Gross margin | 78.7% |
| ROIC | 2.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 78.5% |
Investment Thesis
Informatica Inc. is a data management and cloud integration specialist with a market cap of $7.5B and a ValueSense quality rating of 6.0. The company’s intrinsic value is $33.1, and while its 1-year return is -8.9%, Informatica maintains a high FCF margin 25.6% and gross margin 78.7%. Revenue growth is steady at 1.2%, and the company’s focus on cloud-native solutions and enterprise data integration supports long-term demand.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion in cloud data management
- Strategic partnerships with major cloud providers
- Growth in enterprise digital transformation
Risk Factors
- High debt levels (Total Debt to Equity: 78.5%)
- Competitive pressures from larger cloud vendors
- Slower-than-expected enterprise adoption
Post Holdings, Inc. (POST)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5,788.9M |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $148.1 |
| 1Y Return | -4.8% |
| Revenue | $7,921.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $563.7M |
| Revenue Growth | 0.8% |
| FCF margin | 7.1% |
| Gross margin | 29.2% |
| ROIC | 6.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 183.4% |
Investment Thesis
Post Holdings, Inc. is a diversified consumer packaged goods company with a market cap of $5.8B and a ValueSense quality rating of 6.0. Its intrinsic value is $148.1, and the 1-year return is -4.8%. The company’s revenue is stable at $7.9B, with a FCF margin of 7.1% and gross margin of 29.2%. Post’s broad product portfolio and focus on operational efficiency support resilience in challenging market conditions.
Key Catalysts
- Product innovation and brand expansion
- Cost management initiatives
- Strategic acquisitions in food and beverage
Risk Factors
- High leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 183.4%)
- Commodity price volatility
- Shifting consumer preferences
TXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5,283.4M |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $52.5 |
| 1Y Return | 32.6% |
| Revenue | $2,031.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($790.6M) |
| Revenue Growth | 10.2% |
| FCF margin | (38.9%) |
| Gross margin | 64.0% |
| ROIC | 4.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 179.8% |
Investment Thesis
TXNM Energy, Inc. operates in the energy sector with a market cap of $5.3B and a ValueSense quality rating of 6.1. The company’s intrinsic value is $52.5, and it has delivered a strong 1-year return of 32.6%. Revenue growth is robust at 10.2%, though free cash flow is negative -$790.6M, reflecting heavy investment. Gross margin is healthy at 64%, and the company’s focus on energy innovation and expansion supports future growth.
Key Catalysts
- Strong sector tailwinds and energy demand
- Investment in renewable and alternative energy
- Expansion of production capacity
Risk Factors
- High debt levels (Total Debt to Equity: 179.8%)
- Volatility in energy prices
- Execution risk in large-scale projects
Polaris Inc. (PII)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3,761.1M |
| Quality Rating | 5.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $47.6 |
| 1Y Return | -3.1% |
| Revenue | $6,985.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | $581.4M |
| Revenue Growth | (9.4%) |
| FCF margin | 8.3% |
| Gross margin | 19.2% |
| ROIC | 1.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 112.0% |
Investment Thesis
Polaris Inc. is a manufacturer of powersports vehicles with a market cap of $3.8B and a ValueSense quality rating of 5.3. Its intrinsic value is $47.6, and the 1-year return is -3.1%. Despite revenue contraction -9.4%, Polaris maintains a solid FCF margin 8.3% and gross margin 19.2%. The company’s focus on product innovation and brand strength supports its competitive position.
Key Catalysts
- New product launches and technology upgrades
- Expansion into international markets
- Strategic partnerships
Risk Factors
- High leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 112%)
- Economic sensitivity affecting discretionary spending
- Supply chain disruptions
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLY)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,968.0M |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $30.7 |
| 1Y Return | -24.6% |
| Revenue | $1,670.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $129.4M |
| Revenue Growth | (8.5%) |
| FCF margin | 7.7% |
| Gross margin | 71.1% |
| ROIC | 8.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 126.0% |
Investment Thesis
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is a global publishing and education company with a market cap of $2.0B and a ValueSense quality rating of 6.1. Its intrinsic value is $30.7, and the 1-year return is -24.6%. Despite revenue contraction -8.5%, Wiley maintains a strong gross margin 71.1% and a FCF margin of 7.7%. The company’s focus on digital transformation and academic publishing supports long-term relevance.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in digital academic publishing
- Expansion of online learning platforms
- Strategic cost management
Risk Factors
- High leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 126%)
- Declining print revenues
- Competitive pressures in education technology
Gannett Co., Inc. (GCI)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $760.0M |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $8.8 |
| 1Y Return | 13.0% |
| Revenue | $2,338.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | $28.3M |
| Revenue Growth | (8.6%) |
| FCF margin | 1.2% |
| Gross margin | 45.4% |
| ROIC | 10.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 597.1% |
Investment Thesis
Gannett Co., Inc. is a leading local news and media company with a market cap of $760M and a ValueSense quality rating of 5.7. Its intrinsic value is $8.8, and the 1-year return is 13%. Revenue contraction -8.6% is offset by a positive FCF margin 1.2% and gross margin 45.4%. Gannett’s focus on digital transformation and local content supports its competitive position.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in digital advertising and subscriptions
- Expansion of local news coverage
- Cost optimization strategies
Risk Factors
- Extremely high leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 597.1%)
- Declining print revenues
- Competition from digital media platforms
Agora, Inc. (API)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $82.2M |
| Quality Rating | 5.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $66.1 |
| 1Y Return | 25.9% |
| Revenue | $133.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($23.3M) |
| Revenue Growth | (3.4%) |
| FCF margin | (17.5%) |
| Gross margin | 67.0% |
| ROIC | (17.2%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 11.2% |
Investment Thesis
Agora, Inc. is a technology company specializing in real-time engagement solutions, with a market cap of $82M and a ValueSense quality rating of 5.1. Its intrinsic value is $66.1, and the 1-year return is 25.9%. Despite revenue contraction -3.4% and negative free cash flow -$23.3M, Agora’s gross margin is strong at 67%. The company’s innovative platform and expansion into new use cases drive future potential.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in real-time engagement and communications
- Expansion into new verticals
- Strategic partnerships
Risk Factors
- Small market cap and limited scale
- Negative ROIC -17.2%
- Competitive pressures from larger tech firms
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans multiple sectors—media, education, technology, consumer goods, and energy—providing broad sector allocation and risk mitigation. The inclusion of both growth-oriented and value-focused companies helps balance volatility, while exposure to digital transformation themes and traditional industries enhances portfolio resilience. Cross-referencing financial health and intrinsic value ratings supports a diversified approach to stock selection.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given current market volatility, entry strategies should focus on dollar-cost averaging and monitoring sector rotation signals. Stocks with strong intrinsic value ratings and positive catalysts may warrant closer tracking for favorable entry points. Investors can use ValueSense’s charting and backtesting tools to simulate potential outcomes and refine timing based on historical performance and forward-looking metrics[1][2][7].
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screening tools, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, sector diversification, and financial health metrics extracted directly from platform data[1][2][3].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
The New York Times Company (NYT) currently holds the highest ValueSense quality rating 7.8 and demonstrates strong financial health, making it a standout for educational analysis.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is emphasized in this watchlist, with picks spanning multiple sectors and risk profiles. Educational analysis suggests that a balanced allocation may help mitigate sector-specific risks.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include high leverage for some companies, revenue contraction in certain sectors, and competitive pressures. Each stock’s risk factors are detailed in its individual analysis section.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Market timing strategies such as dollar-cost averaging and monitoring sector trends are recommended for educational purposes. ValueSense’s charting and backtesting tools can help simulate entry scenarios[2][7].