10 Best Retailtech for November 2025

10 Best Retailtech for November 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The current market environment is characterized by rapid technological innovation, shifting consumer preferences, and a heightened focus on profitability and capital efficiency. Our selection methodology emphasizes intrinsic value, quality ratings, and growth potential, leveraging ValueSense’s proprietary analytics to identify stocks with strong fundamentals, attractive valuations, and sector leadership. Each stock is evaluated for its financial health, return on invested capital (ROIC), free cash flow generation, and risk profile, ensuring a balanced and diversified watchlist.

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

MetricValue
Market Cap$2,606.8B
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$90.7
1Y Return31.0%
Revenue$691.3B
Free Cash Flow$10.6B
Revenue Growth11.5%
FCF margin1.5%
Gross margin49.4%
ROIC14.4%
Total Debt to Equity36.6%

Investment Thesis

Amazon remains a dominant force in global e-commerce and cloud computing, boasting a massive $2.6 trillion market cap. Despite its size, Amazon continues to deliver robust growth, with 11.5% revenue growth and a 31% one-year return. The company’s scale, logistics infrastructure, and AWS leadership underpin its competitive moat. However, its current price is well above ValueSense’s intrinsic value estimate of $90.7, suggesting caution for value-focused investors.

Amazon’s quality rating of 6.1 reflects solid operational efficiency, with a 49.4% gross margin and 14.4% ROIC. Free cash flow stands at $10.6B, though the FCF margin is modest at 1.5%, indicating significant reinvestment and ongoing capital expenditures.

Key Catalysts

  • Continued expansion of AWS and cloud services
  • Growth in advertising and third-party seller services
  • Efficiency gains in logistics and automation
  • International market penetration

Risk Factors

  • High valuation relative to intrinsic value
  • Regulatory scrutiny in the US and EU
  • Margin pressure from logistics and fulfillment costs
  • Competitive threats from other tech giants

Shopify Inc. (SHOP)

MetricValue
Market Cap$225.6B
Quality Rating7.6
Intrinsic Value$30.1
1Y Return122.3%
Revenue$10.0B
Free Cash Flow$1,824.9M
Revenue Growth29.0%
FCF margin18.2%
Gross margin49.3%
ROIC59.1%
Total Debt to Equity9.4%

Investment Thesis

Shopify has emerged as a leading e-commerce platform, enabling millions of businesses worldwide. With a $225.6B market cap and a remarkable 122.3% one-year return, Shopify’s growth story is driven by its scalable SaaS model and ecosystem of merchant solutions. The company’s quality rating of 7.6 is supported by a 29% revenue growth rate, a robust 18.2% FCF margin, and an impressive 59.1% ROIC.

Shopify’s intrinsic value is listed at $30.1, which is significantly lower than its current market price, highlighting a premium valuation. However, its low total debt to equity 9.4% and strong cash flow generation provide financial flexibility for continued innovation and expansion.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of payment and fulfillment services
  • Growth in enterprise and international merchants
  • New product launches and ecosystem enhancements
  • Strategic partnerships and integrations

Risk Factors

  • Elevated valuation multiples
  • Intensifying competition from Amazon, Wix, and others
  • Sensitivity to macroeconomic slowdowns affecting small businesses
  • Currency and international expansion risks

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU)

MetricValue
Market Cap$77.7B
Quality Rating7.1
Intrinsic Value$82.8
1Y Return6.8%
Revenue$12.4B
Free Cash Flow$3,657.0M
Revenue Growth27.6%
FCF margin29.5%
Gross margin43.6%
ROIC37.0%
Total Debt to Equity312.7%

Investment Thesis

Nu Holdings, a digital banking leader in Latin America, has rapidly scaled to a $77.7B market cap. The company’s 27.6% revenue growth and 29.5% FCF margin underscore its operational efficiency and ability to monetize a large, underbanked population. With a quality rating of 7.1 and a 37% ROIC, Nu Holdings is positioned as a fintech disruptor in emerging markets.

Despite a modest 6.8% one-year return, Nu’s intrinsic value of $82.8 suggests potential upside if growth persists. However, the company’s high total debt to equity 312.7% signals a leveraged balance sheet, which could amplify risks in volatile markets.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion into new Latin American markets
  • Launch of new financial products and services
  • Increasing digital adoption and financial inclusion
  • Cross-selling opportunities within its ecosystem

Risk Factors

  • High leverage and exposure to regional economic cycles
  • Regulatory and currency risks in emerging markets
  • Competition from traditional banks and new fintech entrants
  • Execution risk as the company scales

Toast, Inc. (TOST)

MetricValue
Market Cap$21.0B
Quality Rating7.2
Intrinsic Value$75.0
1Y Return20.3%
Revenue$5,530.0M
Free Cash Flow$508.0M
Revenue Growth26.1%
FCF margin9.2%
Gross margin25.2%
ROIC43.0%
Total Debt to Equity1.0%

Investment Thesis

Toast provides cloud-based restaurant management solutions, targeting the digital transformation of the hospitality sector. With a $21.0B market cap and a 20.3% one-year return, Toast’s 26.1% revenue growth and 9.2% FCF margin reflect strong demand for its platform. The company’s quality rating of 7.2 and 43% ROIC highlight efficient capital allocation and product-market fit.

Toast’s intrinsic value of $75.0 is well above its current market price, suggesting potential undervaluation. The company maintains a conservative balance sheet with a total debt to equity ratio of just 1.0%.

Key Catalysts

  • Accelerated adoption of digital solutions in restaurants
  • Expansion into new verticals and geographies
  • Upselling and cross-selling to existing customers
  • Product innovation in payments and analytics

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressures from legacy and new entrants
  • Sensitivity to restaurant industry cycles
  • Execution risk in scaling operations
  • Margin compression from pricing and service costs

Wix.com Ltd. (WIX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$8,136.4M
Quality Rating7.0
Intrinsic Value$353.6
1Y Return-12.9%
Revenue$1,868.7M
Free Cash Flow$551.8M
Revenue Growth13.0%
FCF margin29.5%
Gross margin68.4%
ROIC29.8%
Total Debt to Equity(849.9%)

Investment Thesis

Wix is a global leader in website creation and digital presence solutions, serving millions of users. Despite a recent -12.9% one-year return, Wix maintains a strong financial profile with a $8.1B market cap, 13% revenue growth, and a 29.5% FCF margin. Its quality rating of 7.0 and 68.4% gross margin reflect a scalable SaaS business with high profitability.

Wix’s intrinsic value is $353.6, suggesting significant upside if the company can reignite growth. The company’s negative total debt to equity ratio -849.9% indicates a net cash position, providing resilience in uncertain markets.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in premium subscriptions and business solutions
  • Expansion of e-commerce and payment offerings
  • International market penetration
  • Product innovation and AI-driven tools

Risk Factors

  • Slowing growth in mature markets
  • Competitive threats from Shopify, Squarespace, and others
  • Currency and macroeconomic headwinds
  • Execution risk in new product launches

Agilysys, Inc. (AGYS)

MetricValue
Market Cap$3,498.1M
Quality Rating6.4
Intrinsic Value$71.4
1Y Return25.4%
Revenue$299.8M
Free Cash Flow$56.2M
Revenue Growth17.8%
FCF margin18.7%
Gross margin61.8%
ROIC8.2%
Total Debt to Equity7.0%

Investment Thesis

Agilysys specializes in hospitality software solutions, with a $3.5B market cap and a 25.4% one-year return. The company’s 17.8% revenue growth, 18.7% FCF margin, and 61.8% gross margin highlight its strong operating leverage. A quality rating of 6.4 and 8.2% ROIC indicate solid, if not exceptional, capital efficiency.

Agilysys’s intrinsic value of $71.4 and low total debt to equity 7.0% suggest a stable financial foundation, supporting continued investment in product development and market expansion.

Key Catalysts

  • Increased demand for cloud-based hospitality solutions
  • Expansion into new customer segments
  • Upselling and cross-selling within existing accounts
  • Strategic partnerships and integrations

Risk Factors

  • Industry cyclicality and sensitivity to travel trends
  • Competition from larger software vendors
  • Execution risk in scaling sales and support
  • Margin pressure from R&D and customer acquisition costs

KAR Auction Services, Inc. (KAR)

MetricValue
Market Cap$2,831.6M
Quality Rating6.6
Intrinsic Value$13.5
1Y Return67.2%
Revenue$1,845.2M
Free Cash Flow$298.4M
Revenue Growth11.4%
FCF margin16.2%
Gross margin44.8%
ROIC5.2%
Total Debt to Equity4.0%

Investment Thesis

KAR Auction Services operates digital marketplaces for used vehicles, with a $2.8B market cap and a 67.2% one-year return. The company’s 11.4% revenue growth and 16.2% FCF margin highlight a resilient business model. KAR’s quality rating of 6.6 and 5.2% ROIC reflect moderate capital efficiency, while its low total debt to equity 4.0% supports financial stability.

KAR’s intrinsic value is $13.5, and its strong recent performance is driven by digital transformation and increased demand for used vehicles.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in digital auction volumes
  • Expansion of ancillary services (financing, logistics)
  • Recovery in automotive supply chains
  • Strategic acquisitions and partnerships

Risk Factors

  • Cyclical exposure to auto industry trends
  • Competition from other digital marketplaces
  • Regulatory and economic headwinds
  • Execution risk in technology upgrades

Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD)

MetricValue
Market Cap$2,571.2M
Quality Rating7.5
Intrinsic Value$77.2
1Y Return17.9%
Revenue$751.9M
Free Cash Flow$126.1M
Revenue Growth103.0%
FCF margin16.8%
Gross margin72.9%
ROIC68.0%
Total Debt to Equity6.5%

Investment Thesis

Oddity Tech is a fast-growing beauty and wellness technology company, with a $2.6B market cap and a 17.9% one-year return. The company’s 103% revenue growth and 16.8% FCF margin are exceptional, supported by a quality rating of 7.5 and a 68% ROIC. Oddity’s 72.9% gross margin underscores its premium product positioning and operational efficiency.

With an intrinsic value of $77.2 and low leverage (6.5% total debt to equity), Oddity is well-positioned to capitalize on digital-first consumer trends.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of product lines and digital channels
  • Growth in international markets
  • Brand partnerships and influencer marketing
  • Innovation in personalized beauty solutions

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressures from established beauty brands
  • Execution risk in scaling operations
  • Sensitivity to consumer discretionary spending
  • Regulatory and supply chain risks

Innodata Inc. (INOD)

MetricValue
Market Cap$2,371.5M
Quality Rating8.4
Intrinsic Value$18.2
1Y Return271.0%
Revenue$228.1M
Free Cash Flow$36.1M
Revenue Growth112.5%
FCF margin15.8%
Gross margin41.5%
ROIC59.6%
Total Debt to Equity4.9%

Investment Thesis

Innodata is a data engineering and AI solutions provider, with a $2.4B market cap and a remarkable 271% one-year return. The company’s 112.5% revenue growth, 15.8% FCF margin, and 59.6% ROIC highlight its explosive expansion and capital efficiency. Innodata’s quality rating of 8.4 is the highest in this collection, reflecting strong fundamentals and growth prospects.

With an intrinsic value of $18.2 and low total debt to equity 4.9%, Innodata is well-positioned to benefit from the ongoing digital transformation and AI adoption across industries.

Key Catalysts

  • Surging demand for AI and data solutions
  • Expansion into new verticals and geographies
  • Strategic partnerships with technology leaders
  • Product innovation and IP development

Risk Factors

  • Rapidly evolving competitive landscape
  • Execution risk in scaling operations
  • Customer concentration risks
  • Technology and data security challenges

Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD)

MetricValue
Market Cap$2,200.4M
Quality Rating5.9
Intrinsic Value$307.3
1Y Return27.8%
Revenue$2,915.0M
Free Cash Flow$221.6M
Revenue Growth(23.6%)
FCF margin7.6%
Gross margin31.3%
ROIC6.3%
Total Debt to Equity96.2%

Investment Thesis

Diebold Nixdorf is a global provider of financial and retail technology solutions, with a $2.2B market cap and a 27.8% one-year return. The company’s recent -23.6% revenue growth reflects industry headwinds, but a 7.6% FCF margin and 6.3% ROIC indicate ongoing operational improvements. Diebold’s quality rating of 5.9 is the lowest in this group, suggesting a more cautious outlook.

With an intrinsic value of $307.3 and a high total debt to equity 96.2%, Diebold faces balance sheet constraints but could benefit from industry consolidation and digital transformation initiatives.

Key Catalysts

  • Adoption of next-generation ATM and retail solutions
  • Cost restructuring and operational efficiency programs
  • Expansion in emerging markets
  • Strategic partnerships and M&A

Risk Factors

  • High leverage and refinancing risks
  • Declining demand for legacy hardware
  • Execution risk in digital transformation
  • Competitive pressures from fintech and technology firms

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This watchlist spans multiple sectors—technology, fintech, e-commerce, hospitality, automotive, and consumer goods—providing broad diversification. High-growth technology and SaaS names (Shopify, Wix, Innodata) are balanced by fintech (Nu Holdings), digital marketplaces (KAR), and consumer-focused innovators (Oddity Tech). The inclusion of both established giants (Amazon) and emerging disruptors (Toast, Agilysys) helps mitigate sector-specific risks and enhances the portfolio’s resilience to market volatility.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Given the diverse growth profiles and risk factors, investors may consider staggered entry points or dollar-cost averaging to manage volatility. Monitoring earnings releases, product launches, and macroeconomic indicators can help refine timing. For high-momentum stocks (e.g., Innodata, Shopify), waiting for technical pullbacks may improve entry risk/reward. For value-oriented picks (e.g., Toast, Wix), tracking price-to-intrinsic value gaps can inform opportunistic entries.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?
All stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value and quality rating models, focusing on companies with strong fundamentals, growth potential, and sector leadership based on the latest available data.

Q2: What’s the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; for example, Innodata (INOD) stands out for its explosive growth and high quality rating, while Amazon (AMZN) provides scale and stability. The “best” stock depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
This collection is designed for diversification across sectors and growth profiles. Diversifying can help manage risk, but allocation should be tailored to your own financial objectives and risk appetite.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include high valuations, sector-specific headwinds, regulatory changes, and execution challenges. Some companies also have high leverage or are exposed to cyclical industries.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing varies by stock and market conditions. Monitoring earnings, sector trends, and technical indicators can help identify attractive entry points. Consider a phased approach or dollar-cost averaging to reduce timing risk.