9 Best Telemedicine Virtual Care for December 2025

9 Best Telemedicine Virtual Care for December 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The telemedicine and digital health sector has experienced significant transformation over the past several years, evolving from a pandemic-driven phenomenon into a structural shift in how healthcare is delivered. As of 2025, this sector presents compelling opportunities for value-oriented investors seeking exposure to healthcare innovation with attractive entry points.

Our selection methodology focuses on companies demonstrating strong fundamental metrics within the digital health ecosystem. We evaluate each company based on ValueSense's proprietary quality ratings, intrinsic value calculations, revenue growth trajectories, free cash flow generation, and return on invested capital. The eight companies featured in this analysis represent a cross-section of the telemedicine landscape, from established players with proven business models to emerging platforms capturing market share through innovative service delivery.

Key criteria for inclusion encompassed: companies with meaningful revenue bases and demonstrated path to profitability, strong gross margins indicating pricing power, quality ratings of 4.0 or higher, and intrinsic value assessments that suggest potential upside from current market valuations. This diversified collection allows investors to evaluate opportunities across different market capitalizations and business models within digital health.

Stock #1: Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS)

MetricValue
Market Cap$8,992.0M
Quality Rating6.8
Intrinsic Value$21.5
1Y Return23.4%
Revenue$2,211.0M
Free Cash Flow$131.5M
Revenue Growth78.0%
FCF margin5.9%
Gross margin75.0%
ROIC18.3%
Total Debt to Equity192.4%

Investment Thesis

Hims & Hers represents one of the most mature and operationally efficient players in the direct-to-consumer telemedicine space. With a market capitalization of $8.99 billion and a ValueSense quality rating of 6.8, the company demonstrates strong fundamental execution. The platform has successfully scaled its business to $2.21 billion in annual revenue while maintaining an impressive 75% gross margin, reflecting the inherent economics of digital health delivery with minimal physical infrastructure requirements.

The company's 78% revenue growth rate signals robust market demand and successful customer acquisition strategies. Most notably, Hims & Hers generated $131.5 million in free cash flow with a 5.9% FCF margin, demonstrating the business model's ability to convert top-line growth into actual cash generation. The 18.3% return on invested capital indicates efficient deployment of shareholder capital. With an intrinsic value assessment of $21.5 and a 1-year return of 23.4%, the company has already rewarded investors while maintaining valuation discipline.

Key Catalysts

  • Continued expansion of GLP-1 medication offerings (weight loss and diabetes management)
  • International market penetration and geographic diversification
  • Expansion of chronic disease management programs
  • Potential strategic partnerships or acquisition opportunities
  • Regulatory tailwinds supporting telehealth reimbursement

Risk Factors

  • High debt-to-equity ratio of 192.4% creates financial leverage risk
  • Competitive intensity from larger healthcare incumbents entering digital health
  • Regulatory changes affecting telehealth reimbursement rates
  • Customer acquisition cost inflation in a maturing market
  • Potential pricing pressure on GLP-1 medications as competition increases

Stock #2: Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR)

MetricValue
Market Cap$4,577.1M
Quality Rating5.3
Intrinsic Value$19.3
1Y Return3.7%
Revenue$11.3B
Free Cash Flow$735.6M
Revenue Growth37.4%
FCF margin6.5%
Gross margin21.2%
ROIC92.4%
Total Debt to Equity66.8%

Investment Thesis

Oscar Health operates a differentiated business model within digital health, functioning as a health insurance platform that leverages technology to improve member experience and operational efficiency. With $11.3 billion in annual revenue and a market cap of $4.58 billion, Oscar demonstrates the scale achievable in health tech. The company's 92.4% return on invested capital is exceptional, indicating highly efficient capital deployment and strong competitive positioning.

The 37.4% revenue growth rate reflects both organic expansion and the company's ability to capture market share in the competitive health insurance landscape. Oscar generated $735.6 million in free cash flow with a 6.5% FCF margin, showcasing the sustainability of its business model. The ValueSense quality rating of 5.3 and intrinsic value of $19.3 suggest the market may be underappreciating the company's operational efficiency and cash generation capabilities. The modest 3.7% one-year return indicates the stock has traded relatively sideways, potentially creating a value opportunity.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion into new state markets and geographic penetration
  • Technology-driven cost reduction initiatives improving margins
  • Potential Medicare Advantage market growth
  • Strategic partnerships with healthcare providers
  • Operational leverage as the platform scales

Risk Factors

  • Regulatory scrutiny of health insurance industry practices
  • Medical loss ratio volatility affecting profitability
  • Competition from larger, established insurance carriers
  • Dependence on favorable underwriting results
  • Potential changes to healthcare policy affecting insurance markets

Stock #3: Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC)

MetricValue
Market Cap$1,330.8M
Quality Rating5.8
Intrinsic Value$87.8
1Y Return-36.6%
Revenue$2,528.2M
Free Cash Flow$256.6M
Revenue Growth(2.4%)
FCF margin10.1%
Gross margin69.8%
ROIC(13.1%)
Total Debt to Equity74.1%

Investment Thesis

Teladoc Health operates as a comprehensive virtual care platform serving employers, health plans, and consumers. With $2.53 billion in revenue and a market cap of $1.33 billion, the company has achieved significant scale in the telehealth market. The ValueSense quality rating of 5.8 and intrinsic value of $87.8 present an intriguing valuation dynamic—the intrinsic value substantially exceeds the current market price, suggesting potential undervaluation.

The company maintains a strong 69.8% gross margin, demonstrating pricing power and operational efficiency in virtual care delivery. Free cash flow of $256.6 million with a 10.1% FCF margin indicates the business generates meaningful cash despite recent headwinds. However, the negative 2.4% revenue growth and negative 13.1% ROIC reflect current operational challenges. The dramatic 36.6% one-year decline presents a potential contrarian opportunity for investors believing in the company's recovery trajectory and long-term market position.

Key Catalysts

  • Return to revenue growth as market conditions stabilize
  • Margin expansion through operational efficiency initiatives
  • Expansion of behavioral health and chronic disease management services
  • Potential strategic partnerships or acquisition activity
  • Recovery in employer-sponsored telehealth utilization

Risk Factors

  • Recent revenue decline indicating market saturation or competitive pressures
  • Negative ROIC suggesting current capital deployment challenges
  • Dependence on employer-sponsored benefits market
  • Competitive pressure from larger healthcare platforms
  • Execution risk on turnaround initiatives

Stock #4: GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$986.6M
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$11.9
1Y Return-41.9%
Revenue$800.7M
Free Cash Flow$86.6M
Revenue Growth1.3%
FCF margin10.8%
Gross margin91.0%
ROIC10.8%
Total Debt to Equity10.2%

Investment Thesis

GoodRx operates a unique marketplace model connecting consumers with prescription discounts and pharmacy services. With $800.7 million in revenue and a market cap of $986.6 million, the company has built a valuable platform serving millions of users seeking medication cost transparency. The exceptional 91% gross margin reflects the asset-light nature of the marketplace business model, where GoodRx captures value without bearing pharmaceutical inventory risk.

The ValueSense quality rating of 6.1 and intrinsic value of $11.9 suggest potential upside from current valuations. The company maintains a conservative balance sheet with only 10.2% debt-to-equity ratio, providing financial flexibility. Free cash flow of $86.6 million with a 10.8% FCF margin demonstrates the business model's cash generation capability. However, the 1.3% revenue growth rate indicates market maturation, and the 41.9% one-year decline reflects investor concerns about growth deceleration and competitive dynamics.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion into adjacent healthcare services (telehealth, pharmacy services)
  • International market expansion opportunities
  • Potential strategic acquisitions or partnerships
  • Monetization of user data and healthcare insights
  • Recovery in prescription volumes post-pandemic normalization

Risk Factors

  • Slowing revenue growth indicating market saturation
  • Regulatory changes affecting pharmacy reimbursement models
  • Competition from larger healthcare platforms and pharmacy chains
  • Dependence on pharmacy partner relationships
  • Potential margin compression from competitive pressures

Stock #5: Talkspace, Inc. (TALK)

MetricValue
Market Cap$570.1M
Quality Rating6.3
Intrinsic Value$2.2
1Y Return-1.2%
Revenue$266.7M
Free Cash Flow$26.0M
Revenue Growth47.1%
FCF margin9.7%
Gross margin43.6%
ROIC(1.7%)
Total Debt to Equity0.0%

Investment Thesis

Talkspace operates a digital mental health platform connecting users with licensed therapists and psychiatrists. With $266.7 million in revenue and a market cap of $570.1 million, the company addresses the critical mental health treatment gap through technology-enabled delivery. The 47.1% revenue growth rate demonstrates strong market demand for accessible mental health services, and the ValueSense quality rating of 6.3 reflects solid operational fundamentals.

The company maintains a conservative capital structure with zero debt-to-equity ratio, providing financial stability and flexibility. Free cash flow of $26 million with a 9.7% FCF margin shows the business generates cash despite ongoing growth investments. The intrinsic value of $2.2 and modest negative 1.2% one-year return suggest the market has stabilized valuations after previous volatility. The 43.6% gross margin indicates reasonable pricing power in the mental health services market.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of insurance coverage and reimbursement partnerships
  • International market entry opportunities
  • Expansion into adjacent mental health services
  • Potential profitability inflection as the platform scales
  • Strategic partnerships with employers and health plans

Risk Factors

  • Negative ROIC of negative 1.7% indicating current capital deployment challenges
  • Competitive intensity from larger healthcare platforms
  • Dependence on insurance reimbursement relationships
  • Regulatory changes affecting telehealth mental health services
  • Customer retention and lifetime value dynamics

Stock #6: LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD)

MetricValue
Market Cap$178.0M
Quality Rating6.4
Intrinsic Value$8.5
1Y Return-41.9%
Revenue$225.1M
Free Cash Flow$19.7M
Revenue Growth25.1%
FCF margin8.8%
Gross margin97.5%
ROIC168.8%
Total Debt to Equity193.7%

Investment Thesis

LifeMD operates a direct-to-consumer telehealth platform focused on chronic disease management and prescription services. With $225.1 million in revenue and a market cap of $178 million, the company represents a smaller-cap opportunity in the digital health space. The exceptional 97.5% gross margin reflects the high-margin nature of direct-to-consumer telehealth services with minimal physical infrastructure.

The ValueSense quality rating of 6.4 and intrinsic value of $8.5 suggest potential value recognition. Most remarkably, the company demonstrates a 168.8% return on invested capital, indicating exceptional efficiency in deploying shareholder capital despite its smaller scale. The 25.1% revenue growth rate shows solid market traction, and free cash flow of $19.7 million with an 8.8% FCF margin demonstrates cash generation capability. However, the 41.9% one-year decline and high debt-to-equity ratio of 193.7% reflect market concerns about leverage and growth sustainability.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of GLP-1 medication offerings
  • Geographic market expansion
  • Potential profitability inflection
  • Strategic partnerships or acquisition opportunities
  • Operational leverage as the platform scales

Risk Factors

  • High debt-to-equity ratio of 193.7% creates significant financial leverage
  • Smaller scale relative to competitors may limit competitive advantages
  • Dependence on continued revenue growth to service debt
  • Regulatory changes affecting telehealth reimbursement
  • Customer acquisition cost dynamics in a competitive market

Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.

Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?

Find Hidden Gems First!


Stock #7: EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA)

MetricValue
Market Cap$112.2M
Quality Rating4.9
Intrinsic Value$2.4
1Y Return-29.6%
Revenue$5,160.3K
Free Cash Flow($2,110.4K)
Revenue Growth170.4%
FCF margin(40.9%)
Gross margin22.4%
ROIC(262.9%)
Total Debt to Equity(61.3%)

Investment Thesis

EUDA Health operates in the digital health space with a market cap of $112.2 million and $5.16 million in annual revenue. The company demonstrates exceptional revenue growth of 170.4%, indicating rapid market expansion and strong demand for its services. The ValueSense quality rating of 4.9 reflects the early-stage nature of the business and operational challenges typical of high-growth healthcare startups.

The intrinsic value of $2.4 and 29.6% one-year decline indicate the market has reassessed valuations as the company navigates growth-stage challenges. The 22.4% gross margin is substantially lower than peers, suggesting either a different business model or operational inefficiencies requiring attention. The company represents a speculative opportunity for investors with higher risk tolerance seeking exposure to emerging digital health platforms.

Key Catalysts

  • Scaling of revenue base and operational efficiency improvements
  • Potential path to profitability as the platform matures
  • Strategic partnerships or acquisition opportunities
  • International market expansion
  • Margin expansion through operational leverage

Risk Factors

  • Negative free cash flow of $2.1 million indicating cash burn
  • Negative 40.9% FCF margin showing significant operational challenges
  • Negative 262.9% ROIC indicating severe capital deployment inefficiency
  • Early-stage business model with unproven scalability
  • Potential dilution from future financing needs
  • Regulatory and compliance risks in emerging markets

Stock #8: American Well Corporation (AMWL)

MetricValue
Market Cap$67.5M
Quality Rating4.0
Intrinsic Value$112.3
1Y Return-55.8%
Revenue$208.7M
Free Cash Flow($64.5M)
Revenue Growth(17.8%)
FCF margin(30.9%)
Gross margin39.6%
ROIC(90.2%)
Total Debt to Equity2.0%

Investment Thesis

American Well operates a comprehensive virtual care platform serving consumers, employers, and health systems. With $208.7 million in revenue and a market cap of $67.5 million, the company has experienced significant valuation compression. The ValueSense quality rating of 4.0 reflects substantial operational challenges, while the intrinsic value of $112.3 presents a stark contrast to current market pricing, suggesting either significant undervaluation or fundamental business model concerns.

The company faces headwinds with negative 17.8% revenue decline and negative 30.9% FCF margin, indicating the business is currently burning cash. The negative 90.2% ROIC reflects severe capital deployment challenges. The dramatic 55.8% one-year decline represents a significant repricing of the company's prospects. This represents a deep value opportunity for contrarian investors, though with substantially elevated risk.

Key Catalysts

  • Return to revenue growth as market conditions stabilize
  • Operational restructuring and cost reduction initiatives
  • Potential strategic partnerships or acquisition activity
  • Recovery in employer-sponsored telehealth utilization
  • Path to cash flow breakeven

Risk Factors

  • Negative revenue growth indicating market share loss or demand weakness
  • Negative free cash flow and significant cash burn
  • Severe negative ROIC suggesting fundamental business model challenges
  • Potential need for additional financing or dilution
  • Competitive pressure from larger, better-capitalized platforms
  • Execution risk on turnaround initiatives

Stock #9: Mobile-health Network Solutions Class A Ordinary Shares (MNDR)

MetricValue
Market Cap$11.4M
Quality Rating5.4
Intrinsic Value$7.7
1Y Return16.2%
Revenue$21.2M
Free Cash Flow($8,149.3K)
Revenue Growth133.8%
FCF margin(38.4%)
Gross margin2.0%
ROIC(5,904.8%)
Total Debt to Equity14.3%

Investment Thesis

Mobile-health Network Solutions represents the smallest company in this analysis with an $11.4 million market cap and $21.2 million in annual revenue. The company demonstrates explosive 133.8% revenue growth, indicating rapid market expansion and strong demand for its services. The ValueSense quality rating of 5.4 reflects the early-stage nature of the business and operational challenges typical of micro-cap healthcare companies.

The intrinsic value of $7.7 and positive 16.2% one-year return suggest the market has recognized value in the company's growth trajectory. However, the company faces significant operational challenges with negative free cash flow of $8.15 million and a negative 38.4% FCF margin, indicating substantial cash burn. The 2% gross margin is exceptionally low, suggesting either a unique business model or severe operational inefficiencies requiring immediate attention.

Key Catalysts

  • Scaling of revenue base and operational efficiency improvements
  • Potential path to profitability as the platform matures
  • Strategic partnerships or acquisition opportunities
  • Gross margin expansion through operational leverage
  • International market expansion

Risk Factors

  • Negative free cash flow and significant cash burn
  • Extremely low 2% gross margin indicating pricing or cost structure challenges
  • Negative 5,904.8% ROIC reflecting severe capital deployment inefficiency
  • Micro-cap liquidity and volatility risks
  • Potential dilution from future financing needs
  • Execution risk on business model refinement

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This collection of eight telemedicine and digital health stocks provides meaningful diversification across multiple dimensions of the healthcare technology ecosystem. The portfolio spans different business models—from direct-to-consumer platforms (Hims, Talkspace, LifeMD) to B2B solutions (Teladoc, Oscar) to marketplace models (GoodRx)—allowing investors to gain exposure to various value creation mechanisms within digital health.

From a market capitalization perspective, the portfolio ranges from mega-cap ($8.99B for Hims) to micro-cap ($11.4M for MNDR), providing exposure across the size spectrum. This diversification helps balance growth potential with stability, as larger companies like Hims and Oscar provide operational maturity and cash generation, while smaller companies like EUDA and MNDR offer higher growth potential with elevated risk.

The profitability and cash generation characteristics vary significantly across the portfolio. Companies like Hims, Oscar, and GoodRx demonstrate strong free cash flow generation and positive returns on invested capital, providing portfolio stability. Conversely, companies like American Well, EUDA, and MNDR are in earlier stages with negative cash flow, representing higher-risk, higher-reward opportunities. This mix allows investors to construct portfolios aligned with their risk tolerance and investment horizon.

Sector allocation within digital health includes mental health (Talkspace), prescription services (GoodRx), insurance (Oscar), general telehealth (Hims, Teladoc, LifeMD, American Well), and emerging platforms (EUDA, MNDR). This diversification reduces concentration risk in any single digital health subsector while maintaining cohesive exposure to the broader healthcare technology transformation.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

The telemedicine sector has experienced significant volatility since its pandemic-driven peak, creating multiple entry opportunities for value-oriented investors. The current market environment presents a compelling backdrop for accumulating positions in digital health companies, as many have experienced substantial valuation reductions that may not fully reflect long-term growth potential.

For established players like Hims and Oscar with strong fundamentals and positive cash flow, dollar-cost averaging into positions over 6-12 months allows investors to capture potential further weakness while building meaningful positions. These companies' operational maturity and cash generation provide downside protection, making them suitable for core portfolio holdings.

For turnaround situations like Teladoc and American Well, investors should consider waiting for evidence of operational stabilization before initiating positions. Watching for positive revenue growth inflection, free cash flow improvement, and management execution on strategic initiatives provides confirmation signals before committing capital. These companies offer substantial upside if turnarounds succeed, but timing entry after initial stabilization signals reduces downside risk.

For high-growth, cash-burning companies like EUDA and MNDR, investors should employ a venture capital mindset, accepting the possibility of total loss while recognizing the potential for substantial returns if the business models achieve profitability. Smaller position sizes and longer investment horizons are appropriate for these speculative opportunities.

The broader market environment for healthcare technology remains supportive, with secular trends including aging populations, chronic disease prevalence, and healthcare cost pressures driving sustained demand for digital health solutions. Regulatory tailwinds supporting telehealth reimbursement and insurance coverage expansion provide additional support for the sector's long-term growth trajectory.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected for this analysis?

These eight companies were selected based on ValueSense's comprehensive fundamental analysis methodology. Selection criteria included companies operating within the telemedicine and digital health sector, quality ratings of 4.0 or higher, meaningful revenue bases demonstrating market traction, and intrinsic value assessments suggesting potential investment opportunities. The collection represents a cross-section of business models, market capitalizations, and profitability stages within digital health, enabling investors to evaluate diverse opportunities within the sector.

Q2: Which stock from this list offers the best risk-adjusted opportunity?

Hims & Hers (HIMS) presents the most compelling risk-adjusted opportunity for most investors. The company combines strong fundamentals (78% revenue growth, 75% gross margin, 18.3% ROIC) with operational maturity and positive free cash flow generation. The ValueSense quality rating of 6.8 is the highest in the collection, and the 23.4% one-year return demonstrates the market's recognition of value. For investors seeking exposure to digital health with lower volatility and downside protection, Hims provides an excellent core holding.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or focus on a subset?

The appropriate approach depends on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and portfolio construction strategy. Conservative investors should focus on the highest-quality companies (Hims, Oscar, GoodRx) with proven business models and positive cash flow. Moderate investors might add exposure to turnaround situations (Teladoc, American Well) with smaller position sizes. Aggressive investors with higher risk tolerance might allocate a small percentage to high-growth, cash-burning companies (EUDA, MNDR) seeking venture-like returns. Most investors benefit from diversification across multiple companies rather than concentrated positions in single stocks.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these stock picks?

The primary risks vary by company but include: regulatory changes affecting telehealth reimbursement rates, competitive pressure from larger healthcare incumbents, customer acquisition cost inflation in maturing markets, and execution risk on growth initiatives. For highly leveraged companies like Hims and LifeMD, debt-to-equity ratios above 190% create financial risk. For cash-burning companies like American Well and EUDA, the risk of dilutive financing or business model failure is elevated. Investors should carefully evaluate risk factors specific to each company before investing.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?

The optimal timing depends on individual circumstances and investment horizons. For long-term investors, the current market environment presents attractive entry points after significant valuation reductions. Dollar-cost averaging into positions over 6-12 months reduces timing risk while building meaningful positions. For turnaround situations, waiting for evidence of operational stabilization (positive revenue growth, improving free cash flow) before investing reduces downside risk. For high-growth companies, investors should employ a venture capital mindset with longer investment horizons and acceptance of volatility. ValueSense's backtesting tools enable you to evaluate historical entry points and develop data-driven timing strategies aligned with your investment approach.