10 Best Undervalued Growth Stocks Insiders Are Buying for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market environment is defined by sector rotation, persistent inflationary pressures, and a renewed focus on company fundamentals. Our selection methodology leverages ValueSense’s AI-powered intrinsic value tools, focusing on stocks with strong free cash flow, attractive valuations, and robust quality ratings[1][2]. Each pick is screened for sector diversity, financial health, and potential catalysts, ensuring a balanced and opportunity-rich watchlist.
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $201.9B |
| Quality Rating | 7.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $201.7 |
| 1Y Return | 33.9% |
| Revenue | $47.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $8,540.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 18.2% |
| FCF margin | 18.0% |
| Gross margin | 39.7% |
| ROIC | 66.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 52.2% |
Investment Thesis
Uber Technologies stands out as a leading platform in the global mobility and delivery space, leveraging network effects and technology to drive revenue growth. With a market cap of $201.9B and a robust 1-year return of 33.9%, Uber’s business model benefits from scale, operational leverage, and a growing ecosystem of services. The company’s intrinsic value of $201.7, closely aligned with its market price, suggests fair valuation with upside potential as operational efficiency improves.
Uber’s financials highlight its strength: $47.3B in revenue, $8.54B in free cash flow, and an impressive 18.2% revenue growth rate. The company’s 18.0% FCF margin and 66.4% ROIC reflect efficient capital allocation and profitability. A quality rating of 7.5 underscores its strong fundamentals.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of delivery and logistics services
- Continued adoption of ride-sharing globally
- Improving margins and operational efficiency
- Strong free cash flow generation
Risk Factors
- Regulatory challenges in key markets
- Competitive pressures from new entrants
- Exposure to macroeconomic cycles
- High total debt to equity 52.2%
Stock #2: ConocoPhillips (COP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $111.7B |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $113.5 |
| 1Y Return | -17.6% |
| Revenue | $58.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $6,923.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 3.5% |
| FCF margin | 11.9% |
| Gross margin | 28.7% |
| ROIC | 9.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 35.9% |
Investment Thesis
ConocoPhillips is a major player in the energy sector, focusing on upstream oil and gas exploration and production. With a market cap of $111.7B, the company offers stability and scale, though its 1-year return of -17.6% reflects recent sector volatility. The intrinsic value of $113.5 indicates potential undervaluation relative to its current price.
Financially, ConocoPhillips generates $58.3B in revenue and $6.92B in free cash flow, with a modest 3.5% revenue growth. Its FCF margin of 11.9% and gross margin of 28.7% are solid for the sector, while a 9.3% ROIC signals effective capital deployment. The quality rating of 5.9 suggests average fundamentals, but the company’s scale and cash flow generation remain attractive.
Key Catalysts
- Rising global energy demand
- Strategic asset divestitures and acquisitions
- Operational efficiency improvements
- Shareholder return initiatives (dividends, buybacks)
Risk Factors
- Commodity price volatility
- Regulatory and environmental risks
- Geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains
- Moderate debt levels (35.9% total debt to equity)
Stock #3: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $55.6B |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $26.4 |
| 1Y Return | 176.1% |
| Revenue | $38.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,065.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (3.7%) |
| FCF margin | 10.6% |
| Gross margin | 52.7% |
| ROIC | (12.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 92.7% |
Investment Thesis
Warner Bros. Discovery is a diversified media and entertainment conglomerate, benefiting from a vast content library and global distribution. With a market cap of $55.6B and a remarkable 1-year return of 176.1%, WBD has rebounded strongly, driven by content monetization and streaming growth. The intrinsic value of $26.4 suggests room for further appreciation if execution remains strong.
WBD’s $38.4B in revenue and $4.07B in free cash flow highlight its scale, though revenue growth is currently negative -3.7%. The company boasts a high gross margin of 52.7% but faces challenges with a negative ROIC -12.3% and elevated debt (92.7% total debt to equity). A quality rating of 6.1 reflects mixed fundamentals but significant turnaround potential.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in streaming and digital platforms
- Content licensing and international expansion
- Cost rationalization and debt reduction
- Strategic partnerships and M&A activity
Risk Factors
- High leverage and interest expense
- Intense competition in streaming
- Shifts in consumer media consumption
- Execution risk on integration and synergy targets
Stock #4: Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $31.3B |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $556.0 |
| 1Y Return | -28.6% |
| Revenue | $55.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,390.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.0% |
| Gross margin | 60.4% |
| ROIC | 11.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 620.4% |
Investment Thesis
Charter Communications is a leading broadband and cable provider in the U.S., with a $31.3B market cap. Despite a -28.6% 1-year return, the company’s intrinsic value of $556.0 signals potential undervaluation. Charter’s $55.0B revenue and $4.39B free cash flow are supported by a high gross margin of 60.4% and a quality rating of 6.3.
The company’s FCF margin is 8.0%, with minimal revenue growth 0.2%. ROIC stands at 11.0%, but the firm’s high leverage (620.4% total debt to equity) is a notable risk. Charter’s scale and infrastructure position it well for long-term broadband demand.
Key Catalysts
- Broadband subscriber growth
- Expansion of fiber and wireless offerings
- Cost efficiencies and margin improvement
- Potential for industry consolidation
Risk Factors
- High debt burden
- Regulatory scrutiny
- Competitive threats from telecom and streaming
- Slowing growth in mature markets
Stock #5: CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.0B |
| Quality Rating | 6.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $57.4 |
| 1Y Return | 31.2% |
| Revenue | $9,114.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($2,800.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | 6.4% |
| FCF margin | (30.7%) |
| Gross margin | 44.9% |
| ROIC | 10.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | (28.2%) |
Investment Thesis
CenterPoint Energy is a regulated utility serving millions of customers, offering defensive characteristics and stable cash flows. With a $25.0B market cap and a 1-year return of 31.2%, CNP is positioned as a reliable income play. The intrinsic value of $57.4 suggests potential upside.
CNP’s $9.11B revenue is paired with a negative free cash flow -$2.8B, reflecting heavy capital expenditures. Revenue growth is 6.4%, and the company maintains a solid gross margin of 44.9%. The quality rating of 6.5 and a 10.0% ROIC indicate operational strength, though negative FCF margin and debt dynamics warrant caution.
Key Catalysts
- Infrastructure modernization and grid investments
- Stable regulatory environment
- Population growth in service areas
- Renewable energy integration
Risk Factors
- Negative free cash flow
- Regulatory rate risks
- Sensitivity to interest rates
- Debt management (negative total debt to equity)
Stock #6: Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.3B |
| Quality Rating | 5.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $45.8 |
| 1Y Return | -26.6% |
| Revenue | $31.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $800.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 90.5% |
| FCF margin | 2.6% |
| Gross margin | 19.6% |
| ROIC | 4.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 4.3% |
Investment Thesis
Smurfit Westrock is a global leader in sustainable packaging, with a $19.3B market cap. Despite a -26.6% 1-year return, the company’s 90.5% revenue growth signals transformative expansion, possibly through M&A or new market penetration. The intrinsic value of $45.8 highlights potential undervaluation.
SW’s $31.1B revenue and $800M free cash flow are complemented by a modest 2.6% FCF margin. The company’s gross margin is 19.6%, and ROIC is 4.2%. A quality rating of 5.6 reflects average fundamentals, but sector tailwinds in sustainability and e-commerce packaging are notable.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in e-commerce and sustainable packaging
- Operational synergies from recent mergers
- Expansion into emerging markets
- Cost optimization initiatives
Risk Factors
- Cyclical demand in packaging
- Raw material price volatility
- Execution risk on integration
- Modest profitability metrics
Stock #7: Gartner, Inc. (IT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.2B |
| Quality Rating | 7.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $371.4 |
| 1Y Return | -50.6% |
| Revenue | $6,420.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,511.7M |
| Revenue Growth | 5.9% |
| FCF margin | 23.5% |
| Gross margin | 68.0% |
| ROIC | 23.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 186.8% |
Investment Thesis
Gartner is a global leader in research and advisory services, serving enterprise clients across sectors. With a $19.2B market cap and a quality rating of 7.5, Gartner’s business model is resilient, though its -50.6% 1-year return reflects recent headwinds. The intrinsic value of $371.4 suggests significant upside if fundamentals stabilize.
Gartner generates $6.42B in revenue and $1.51B in free cash flow, with a 23.5% FCF margin and a sector-leading 68.0% gross margin. ROIC is strong at 23.2%, though leverage is elevated (186.8% total debt to equity). The company’s focus on digital transformation and enterprise spending is a long-term growth driver.
Key Catalysts
- Increased demand for digital transformation insights
- Expansion of subscription-based services
- Penetration into new verticals and geographies
- Margin expansion through operational leverage
Risk Factors
- High leverage
- Sensitivity to corporate IT budgets
- Competitive pressures from new entrants
- Market volatility affecting client spending
Stock #8: The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.0B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $95.5 |
| 1Y Return | -33.2% |
| Revenue | $4,045.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | $411.9M |
| Revenue Growth | 6.4% |
| FCF margin | 10.2% |
| Gross margin | 67.0% |
| ROIC | 6.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 29.7% |
Investment Thesis
The Cooper Companies is a specialty healthcare company focused on medical devices and vision care. With a $14.0B market cap and a quality rating of 6.2, COO offers exposure to secular healthcare growth trends. The -33.2% 1-year return suggests recent challenges, but an intrinsic value of $95.5 points to potential recovery.
COO’s $4.05B revenue and $411.9M free cash flow are supported by a 10.2% FCF margin and a robust 67.0% gross margin. ROIC is 6.0%, and leverage is moderate (29.7% total debt to equity). The company’s innovation pipeline and global reach are key strengths.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in vision care and specialty medical devices
- Product innovation and new launches
- Expansion in emerging markets
- Strategic acquisitions
Risk Factors
- Regulatory hurdles for new products
- Pricing pressures in healthcare
- Currency and supply chain risks
- Moderate profitability
Stock #9: Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.5B |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $218.6 |
| 1Y Return | -7.7% |
| Revenue | $10.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | $918.3M |
| Revenue Growth | 3.3% |
| FCF margin | 8.4% |
| Gross margin | 25.5% |
| ROIC | 11.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 37.9% |
Investment Thesis
Toll Brothers is a leading U.S. homebuilder, offering exposure to the housing market’s cyclical recovery. With a $13.5B market cap and a quality rating of 6.3, TOL’s -7.7% 1-year return reflects sector headwinds, but an intrinsic value of $218.6 suggests undervaluation.
TOL’s $10.9B revenue and $918.3M free cash flow are paired with an 8.4% FCF margin and a 25.5% gross margin. ROIC is 11.9%, and debt is manageable (37.9% total debt to equity). The company’s focus on luxury and move-up buyers supports margin resilience.
Key Catalysts
- Housing market recovery and demographic trends
- Expansion into new markets
- Product mix optimization
- Shareholder return initiatives
Risk Factors
- Interest rate sensitivity
- Cyclical housing demand
- Supply chain and labor constraints
- Regulatory and zoning risks
Stock #10: Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.3B |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $211.8 |
| 1Y Return | -9.0% |
| Revenue | $5,962.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $442.9M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.9% |
| FCF margin | 7.4% |
| Gross margin | 31.1% |
| ROIC | 8.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 9.4% |
Investment Thesis
Clean Harbors is a leading provider of environmental and industrial services, with a $11.3B market cap and a quality rating of 6.0. The -9.0% 1-year return reflects sector volatility, but an intrinsic value of $211.8 indicates potential upside. CLH’s $5.96B revenue and $442.9M free cash flow are supported by a 7.4% FCF margin and a 31.1% gross margin.
ROIC is 8.6%, and leverage is low (9.4% total debt to equity). The company’s exposure to environmental compliance and waste management provides defensive characteristics and growth opportunities.
Key Catalysts
- Increasing environmental regulations
- Expansion of hazardous waste services
- Growth in industrial and energy end-markets
- Margin improvement initiatives
Risk Factors
- Regulatory compliance costs
- Cyclical industrial demand
- Competition from larger players
- Project execution risks
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans multiple sectors—technology, energy, media, utilities, packaging, research, healthcare, housing, and environmental services—providing a diversified foundation for educational portfolio construction. The mix of growth, defensive, and cyclical names helps balance risk and return, while exposure to both U.S. and global markets enhances resilience against sector-specific downturns.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Market timing remains challenging, but ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools and quality ratings can help identify attractive entry points[1][2]. Investors may consider dollar-cost averaging into these positions, focusing on stocks trading below intrinsic value or those with improving fundamentals. Monitoring sector rotation and macroeconomic trends can further refine entry strategies.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s AI-driven stock screener, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, free cash flow, and sector diversification to identify compelling educational opportunities[1][2].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; Uber (UBER) and Gartner (IT) stand out for their high quality ratings and strong free cash flow, but the best choice depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is a key principle in portfolio construction. This list is designed to provide sector balance and reduce risk, but allocation decisions should be tailored to your personal financial situation.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector-specific headwinds, high leverage for some companies, regulatory changes, and macroeconomic volatility. Each stock analysis above details specific risk factors.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal entry points often occur when a stock trades below its intrinsic value or after positive fundamental shifts. ValueSense’s tools can help monitor valuation and quality trends for timely educational insights.