10 Best Undervalued Industrials Stocks for October 2025

10 Best Undervalued Industrials Stocks for October 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The 2025 market landscape is defined by volatility, sector rotation, and a renewed focus on fundamentals. Our selection methodology prioritizes intrinsic value, quality ratings, and free cash flow—key indicators of resilience and upside potential. Stocks are chosen from the ValueSense platform based on: - Discount to intrinsic value - Sector leadership and financial health - Growth catalysts and risk-adjusted returns - Diversification across industrials, transportation, and defense

This watchlist targets undervalued stocks with strong fundamentals, aiming to balance growth prospects and risk management for retail investors seeking robust, diversified exposure.

The Boeing Company (BA)

MetricValue
Market Cap$160.3B
Quality Rating5.8
Intrinsic Value$235.7
1Y Return36.8%
Revenue$75.3B
Free Cash Flow($8,117.0M)
Revenue Growth2.4%
FCF margin(10.8%)
Gross margin(0.3%)
ROIC(8.3%)
Total Debt to Equity(1,617.8%)

Investment Thesis

Boeing stands as a global aerospace leader, offering exposure to commercial aviation and defense. Despite recent turbulence, its large market cap of $160.3B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $235.7 (well above current levels) highlight significant upside potential. The company’s 1-year return of 36.8% signals renewed investor confidence, even as it navigates operational and supply chain challenges.

Boeing’s revenue of $75.3B and modest revenue growth of 2.4% reflect stabilization after a period of disruption. However, negative free cash flow (-$8,117M) and margins indicate ongoing restructuring and cost pressures. The quality rating of 5.8 suggests moderate long-term prospects, with the potential for margin recovery as global air travel rebounds.

Key Catalysts

  • Recovery in global air travel and new aircraft orders
  • Defense contracts and government spending
  • Operational turnaround and cost management

Risk Factors

  • High leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 1,617.8%)
  • Negative free cash flow and margins
  • Execution risk in restructuring and supply chain

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

MetricValue
Market Cap$115.2B
Quality Rating5.1
Intrinsic Value$824.0
1Y Return-18.4%
Revenue$71.8B
Free Cash Flow$3,329.0M
Revenue Growth1.1%
FCF margin4.6%
Gross margin8.2%
ROIC13.4%
Total Debt to Equity405.7%

Investment Thesis

Lockheed Martin is a cornerstone of the global defense sector, with a market cap of $115.2B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $824.0. Despite a 1-year return of -18.4%, the company’s robust free cash flow $3,329M and ROIC of 13.4% underscore its operational efficiency and cash generation. The quality rating of 5.1 reflects a stable, if not high-growth, profile.

Lockheed’s revenue of $71.8B and steady revenue growth 1.1% are supported by a strong backlog and ongoing defense spending. Its gross margin of 8.2% and FCF margin of 4.6% indicate disciplined cost control, while high leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 405.7%) remains a watchpoint.

Key Catalysts

  • Sustained global defense demand
  • New contract wins and technology upgrades
  • Shareholder returns via dividends and buybacks

Risk Factors

  • High debt levels
  • Geopolitical and regulatory uncertainties
  • Margin pressure from fixed-price contracts

General Dynamics Corporation (GD)

MetricValue
Market Cap$88.6B
Quality Rating6.2
Intrinsic Value$494.0
1Y Return9.0%
Revenue$50.3B
Free Cash Flow$4,130.0M
Revenue Growth11.9%
FCF margin8.2%
Gross margin15.4%
ROIC9.1%
Total Debt to Equity45.0%

Investment Thesis

General Dynamics offers a balanced defense and aerospace portfolio, with a market cap of $88.6B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $494.0. The company’s quality rating of 6.2 is among the highest in this group, reflecting strong fundamentals and consistent execution. A 1-year return of 9.0% and revenue growth of 11.9% highlight its resilience and growth momentum.

GD’s free cash flow $4,130M and FCF margin 8.2% support ongoing capital allocation flexibility. With a gross margin of 15.4% and ROIC of 9.1%, the company demonstrates operational strength. Its Total Debt to Equity of 45.0% is comparatively conservative, reducing financial risk.

Key Catalysts

  • Expanding defense budgets and international sales
  • Strong order backlog in aerospace and marine systems
  • Margin expansion through efficiency initiatives

Risk Factors

  • Program execution risks
  • Potential defense spending shifts
  • Competitive pressures in key segments

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)

MetricValue
Market Cap$86.1B
Quality Rating5.6
Intrinsic Value$849.2
1Y Return13.7%
Revenue$40.5B
Free Cash Flow$1,308.0M
Revenue Growth(0.6%)
FCF margin3.2%
Gross margin19.3%
ROIC8.6%
Total Debt to Equity113.2%

Investment Thesis

Northrop Grumman is a leading defense contractor with a market cap of $86.1B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $849.2. The company’s quality rating of 5.6 and 1-year return of 13.7% reflect steady performance in a challenging environment. Although revenue growth is slightly negative -0.6%, Northrop’s gross margin 19.3% and ROIC 8.6% remain robust.

Free cash flow of $1,308M and a FCF margin of 3.2% provide financial flexibility, while a Total Debt to Equity of 113.2% is moderate for the sector. The company’s focus on advanced technologies and strategic contracts positions it for long-term growth.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in autonomous systems and space programs
  • Strong government contract pipeline
  • Innovation in defense technologies

Risk Factors

  • Margin compression from cost overruns
  • Budgetary uncertainties
  • Execution risk on large-scale projects

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)

MetricValue
Market Cap$72.5B
Quality Rating6.0
Intrinsic Value$143.9
1Y Return-35.3%
Revenue$90.3B
Free Cash Flow$3,539.0M
Revenue Growth0.9%
FCF margin3.9%
Gross margin18.2%
ROIC12.9%
Total Debt to Equity183.2%

Investment Thesis

UPS is a global logistics leader with a market cap of $72.5B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $143.9. Despite a 1-year return of -35.3%, the company’s quality rating of 6.0 and gross margin of 18.2% highlight its operational scale. UPS generated $3,539M in free cash flow, with a FCF margin of 3.9% and ROIC of 12.9%.

Revenue growth is modest (0.9%), reflecting a normalization after pandemic-driven surges. The company’s Total Debt to Equity of 183.2% is notable, but manageable given its cash flow generation and global footprint.

Key Catalysts

  • E-commerce growth and supply chain optimization
  • Expansion into healthcare logistics
  • Cost efficiency initiatives

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressures from peers and new entrants
  • Economic sensitivity and fuel costs
  • High leverage

CSX Corporation (CSX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$67.2B
Quality Rating5.5
Intrinsic Value$42.3
1Y Return2.2%
Revenue$14.2B
Free Cash Flow$2,006.0M
Revenue Growth(3.3%)
FCF margin14.2%
Gross margin34.5%
ROIC10.2%
Total Debt to Equity158.8%

Investment Thesis

CSX is a major North American rail operator with a market cap of $67.2B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $42.3. The company’s quality rating of 5.5 and free cash flow of $2,006M support its stable dividend and reinvestment strategy. While revenue growth is negative -3.3%, CSX maintains a strong gross margin 34.5% and FCF margin 14.2%.

The ROIC of 10.2% and Total Debt to Equity of 158.8% reflect efficient capital allocation and moderate leverage. CSX’s focus on operational efficiency and network optimization positions it well for cyclical recovery.

Key Catalysts

  • Intermodal and bulk volume recovery
  • Efficiency gains from technology investments
  • Infrastructure spending tailwinds

Risk Factors

  • Economic sensitivity and freight demand volatility
  • Regulatory changes
  • Competition from trucking and other railroads

Canadian National Railway Company (CNI)

MetricValue
Market Cap$59.4B
Quality Rating5.9
Intrinsic Value$105.8
1Y Return-17.3%
RevenueCA$17.1B
Free Cash FlowCA$3,234.0M
Revenue Growth(7.4%)
FCF margin18.9%
Gross margin41.3%
ROIC10.1%
Total Debt to Equity96.4%

Investment Thesis

Canadian National Railway is a leading North American rail operator with a market cap of $59.4B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $105.8. The quality rating of 5.9 and free cash flow of CA$3,234M highlight its financial strength. Despite a 1-year return of -17.3% and revenue decline -7.4%, CNI boasts a gross margin of 41.3% and FCF margin of 18.9%.

The company’s ROIC of 10.1% and Total Debt to Equity of 96.4% indicate prudent capital management. CNI’s extensive network and efficiency initiatives support long-term value creation.

Key Catalysts

  • Cross-border trade growth
  • Efficiency improvements and automation
  • Infrastructure investments

Risk Factors

  • Currency fluctuations (CAD/USD)
  • Economic cycles impacting freight volumes
  • Regulatory and labor risks

Cummins Inc. (CMI)

MetricValue
Market Cap$58.2B
Quality Rating6.4
Intrinsic Value$622.8
1Y Return27.8%
Revenue$33.7B
Free Cash Flow$1,652.0M
Revenue Growth(1.3%)
FCF margin4.9%
Gross margin25.6%
ROIC16.4%
Total Debt to Equity67.5%

Investment Thesis

Cummins is a global leader in engines and power solutions, with a market cap of $58.2B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $622.8. The company’s quality rating of 6.4 is the highest in this watchlist, reflecting strong fundamentals and innovation. A 1-year return of 27.8% and gross margin of 25.6% underscore its competitive edge.

Despite a slight revenue decline -1.3%, Cummins generates $1,652M in free cash flow and maintains a FCF margin of 4.9%. The ROIC of 16.4% and Total Debt to Equity of 67.5% indicate efficient capital deployment and moderate leverage.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in alternative powertrains and electrification
  • Global infrastructure and transportation demand
  • Strategic partnerships and R&D

Risk Factors

  • Cyclical demand in heavy industry
  • Technology transition risks
  • Raw material cost pressures

FedEx Corporation (FDX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$57.6B
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$348.0
1Y Return-11.9%
Revenue$88.6B
Free Cash Flow$3,654.0M
Revenue Growth1.1%
FCF margin4.1%
Gross margin24.2%
ROIC5.9%
Total Debt to Equity136.5%

Investment Thesis

FedEx is a global logistics powerhouse with a market cap of $57.6B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $348.0. The quality rating of 6.1 and free cash flow of $3,654M highlight its operational scale. Despite a 1-year return of -11.9%, FedEx’s gross margin of 24.2% and ROIC of 5.9% support its long-term positioning.

Revenue growth is modest (1.1%), but the company’s FCF margin of 4.1% and Total Debt to Equity of 136.5% are manageable given its global reach and efficiency initiatives.

Key Catalysts

  • E-commerce and global trade growth
  • Network optimization and cost controls
  • Expansion into healthcare logistics

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pricing pressures
  • Economic sensitivity
  • Fuel and labor cost volatility

Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

MetricValue
Market Cap$53.8B
Quality Rating6.2
Intrinsic Value$505.2
1Y Return-10.7%
Revenue$7,468.1M
Free Cash Flow$2,321.4M
Revenue Growth13.6%
FCF margin31.1%
Gross margin68.9%
ROIC5.5%
Total Debt to Equity45.1%

Investment Thesis

Roper Technologies is a diversified technology and industrial company with a market cap of $53.8B and a ValueSense intrinsic value of $505.2. The quality rating of 6.2 and free cash flow of $2,321.4M reflect strong cash generation. Despite a 1-year return of -10.7%, Roper’s revenue growth of 13.6% and gross margin of 68.9% are standouts in this group.

The company’s FCF margin of 31.1% and Total Debt to Equity of 45.1% indicate prudent financial management. Roper’s focus on high-margin, recurring revenue businesses supports long-term value creation.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in software and technology solutions
  • Margin expansion from recurring revenues
  • Strategic acquisitions

Risk Factors

  • Integration risks from acquisitions
  • Technology disruption
  • Economic sensitivity in industrial segments

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This watchlist spans defense, logistics, rail, and industrial technology, offering sectoral diversification and risk mitigation.
- Defense stocks (LMT, GD, NOC, BA) provide stability and counter-cyclical exposure. - Transportation and logistics (UPS, FDX, CSX, CNI) offer growth tied to global trade and e-commerce. - Industrial and technology (CMI, ROP) add innovation and margin expansion potential.

Balanced allocation across these sectors can help smooth portfolio volatility and capture opportunities from multiple economic drivers.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Given current market volatility, dollar-cost averaging and staged entry points can help manage risk.
- Monitor technical levels and earnings reports for optimal entry. - Consider macroeconomic trends (interest rates, government spending) that impact sector performance. - Use ValueSense intrinsic value estimates as a guide for identifying attractive entry points.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?
All stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, focusing on companies with strong fundamentals, sector leadership, and a discount to their calculated intrinsic value.

Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; for example, Cummins (CMI) and General Dynamics (GD) have the highest quality ratings, while Roper Technologies (ROP) boasts exceptional margins. The "best" depends on your sector preference and risk tolerance.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
This watchlist is designed for diversification across defense, logistics, rail, and industrial technology. Diversifying can help manage risk and capture growth from different economic drivers.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include high leverage (notably at Boeing and UPS), economic sensitivity (logistics and rail), and execution risks in defense and technology sectors. Always review each company’s financials and sector outlook.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing depends on market conditions, earnings cycles, and macroeconomic trends. Consider dollar-cost averaging and use ValueSense’s intrinsic value estimates to identify attractive entry points.


For more in-depth analysis and the latest stock ideas, visit ValueSense and explore our full suite of research tools.