10 Best Undervalued Industrials Stocks for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The industrials and logistics sectors are at the crossroads of global supply chain transformation, defense modernization, and infrastructure investment. In November 2025, macroeconomic resilience and ongoing innovation have driven select companies to outperform, despite volatility in broader markets. Our stock picks are curated using ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and deep-dive fundamental analysis. We prioritize:
- Undervalued stocks trading below intrinsic value
- Strong or improving fundamentals (revenue growth, free cash flow, ROIC)
- Sector diversification across defense, logistics, and transportation
- Balanced risk profiles with transparent debt and margin metrics
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: The Boeing Company (BA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $152.1B |
| Quality Rating | 4.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $231.4 |
| 1Y Return | 34.6% |
| Revenue | $80.8B |
| Free Cash Flow | ($4,364.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | 10.2% |
| FCF margin | (5.4%) |
| Gross margin | 1.1% |
| ROIC | (7.9%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | (646.5%) |
Investment Thesis
Boeing stands as a global aerospace leader, benefiting from a resurgence in commercial air travel and robust defense contracts. Despite recent operational headwinds, its 1-year return of 34.6% signals renewed investor confidence. The company’s intrinsic value is estimated at $231.4, suggesting upside potential relative to recent market prices. However, negative free cash flow and a gross margin of just 1.1% highlight ongoing challenges in cost management and production efficiency.
Key Catalysts
- Recovery in global air travel and commercial jet deliveries
- Expansion of defense and space contracts
- Potential for operational turnaround and margin improvement
- Strategic investments in next-generation aircraft
Risk Factors
- High leverage (total debt to equity at 646.5%)
- Negative free cash flow and low profitability
- Execution risks in ramping up production
- Regulatory and supply chain uncertainties
Stock #2: Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $114.1B |
| Quality Rating | 5.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $827.2 |
| 1Y Return | -8.7% |
| Revenue | $73.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,593.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.9% |
| FCF margin | 6.3% |
| Gross margin | 8.2% |
| ROIC | 16.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 359.0% |
Investment Thesis
Lockheed Martin is a cornerstone of the U.S. defense sector, with a $114.1B market cap and a robust quality rating of 5.4. Its intrinsic value of $827.2 is well above current trading levels, indicating undervaluation. The company generates strong free cash flow $4.6B and maintains a healthy FCF margin 6.3%. Despite a negative 1-year return -8.7%, Lockheed’s high ROIC 16.3% and steady revenue base position it for long-term resilience amid rising global defense spending.
Key Catalysts
- Growing defense budgets and international orders
- Technological leadership in aerospace and missile systems
- Recurring revenue from long-term government contracts
- Expansion into space and advanced defense technologies
Risk Factors
- Elevated debt (total debt to equity at 359.0%)
- Margin pressure from fixed-price contracts
- Geopolitical and regulatory risks
- Potential delays in major program deliveries
Stock #3: General Dynamics Corporation (GD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $92.7B |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $488.9 |
| 1Y Return | 18.9% |
| Revenue | $51.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,812.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 11.9% |
| FCF margin | 9.3% |
| Gross margin | 15.3% |
| ROIC | 9.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 41.7% |
Investment Thesis
General Dynamics offers a balanced defense and aerospace portfolio, with a $92.7B market cap and a high quality rating of 6.4. Its intrinsic value is $488.9, and the company has delivered an 18.9% return over the past year. GD’s strong free cash flow $4.8B, double-digit revenue growth 11.9%, and solid gross margin 15.3% underscore its operational strength. With a moderate debt profile (total debt to equity at 41.7%), General Dynamics is well-positioned for continued growth.
Key Catalysts
- Sustained demand for defense platforms and services
- Growth in aerospace and business jet segments
- Efficient capital allocation and shareholder returns
- Expansion in cybersecurity and mission systems
Risk Factors
- Exposure to government budget cycles
- Competitive pressures in defense contracting
- Potential cost overruns in large projects
- Sensitivity to geopolitical developments
Stock #4: Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $83.5B |
| Quality Rating | 5.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $819.4 |
| 1Y Return | 15.6% |
| Revenue | $40.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,834.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (0.1%) |
| FCF margin | 4.5% |
| Gross margin | 19.4% |
| ROIC | 8.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 22.7% |
Investment Thesis
Northrop Grumman is a leading defense contractor with a focus on advanced aerospace and mission systems. With a market cap of $83.5B and an intrinsic value of $819.4, NOC remains attractively valued. The company’s 1-year return of 15.6% and gross margin of 19.4% reflect strong operational performance, though revenue growth has been flat. Northrop’s moderate leverage and consistent free cash flow $1.8B support ongoing innovation and shareholder returns.
Key Catalysts
- Leadership in autonomous systems and space technologies
- Expansion of missile defense and cybersecurity offerings
- Stable government contract pipeline
- Investments in next-generation platforms
Risk Factors
- Flat revenue growth -0.1%
- Dependence on government contracts
- Competitive landscape in defense technology
- Program execution and cost management risks
Stock #5: United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $81.9B |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $138.0 |
| 1Y Return | -26.1% |
| Revenue | $89.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,396.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (1.3%) |
| FCF margin | 4.9% |
| Gross margin | 18.1% |
| ROIC | 12.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 184.3% |
Investment Thesis
UPS is a global logistics leader with a $81.9B market cap and a quality rating of 6.0. Despite a challenging year (-26.1% return), UPS maintains a strong intrinsic value of $138.0 and generates healthy free cash flow $4.4B. The company’s gross margin of 18.1% and ROIC of 12.6% reflect operational efficiency, while its high leverage (total debt to equity at 184.3%) warrants close monitoring.
Key Catalysts
- E-commerce growth fueling parcel volume
- Expansion of healthcare and international logistics services
- Operational efficiency initiatives
- Strategic capital investments in automation
Risk Factors
- High debt levels
- Margin pressure from competitive pricing
- Sensitivity to global economic cycles
- Labor and regulatory risks
Stock #6: CSX Corporation (CSX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $67.1B |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $37.5 |
| 1Y Return | 7.9% |
| Revenue | $15.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $3,777.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.1% |
| FCF margin | 25.2% |
| Gross margin | 36.6% |
| ROIC | 18.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 12.3% |
Investment Thesis
CSX is a premier North American rail operator with a $67.1B market cap and a top-tier quality rating of 6.4. The company’s intrinsic value is $37.5, and it boasts a 1-year return of 7.9%. CSX’s standout metrics include a 25.2% FCF margin, 36.6% gross margin, and an industry-leading ROIC of 18.8%. With low leverage (total debt to equity at 12.3%), CSX offers stability and consistent cash generation.
Key Catalysts
- Resilient rail freight demand
- Efficiency gains from network optimization
- Expansion into intermodal and bulk transport
- Strong capital discipline
Risk Factors
- Exposure to cyclical commodity volumes
- Regulatory and labor challenges
- Infrastructure investment requirements
- Competition from trucking and other railroads
Stock #7: FedEx Corporation (FDX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $61.7B |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $347.1 |
| 1Y Return | -6.3% |
| Revenue | $88.6B |
| Free Cash Flow | $3,654.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 1.1% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% |
| Gross margin | 24.2% |
| ROIC | 5.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 136.5% |
Investment Thesis
FedEx is a global logistics powerhouse with a $61.7B market cap and a quality rating of 6.1. The company’s intrinsic value is $347.1, and it generates $3.7B in free cash flow. Despite a negative 1-year return -6.3%, FedEx’s gross margin of 24.2% and ongoing efficiency initiatives position it for recovery as global trade rebounds.
Key Catalysts
- E-commerce and international shipping growth
- Cost reduction and network optimization
- Expansion of healthcare logistics
- Strategic investments in automation and sustainability
Risk Factors
- High leverage (total debt to equity at 136.5%)
- Margin compression from competitive pressures
- Sensitivity to global economic trends
- Labor and regulatory headwinds
Stock #8: Cummins Inc. (CMI)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $60.3B |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $611.7 |
| 1Y Return | 34.3% |
| Revenue | $33.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,652.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (1.3%) |
| FCF margin | 4.9% |
| Gross margin | 25.6% |
| ROIC | 16.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 67.5% |
Investment Thesis
Cummins is a leader in engine and power solutions, with a $60.3B market cap and a high quality rating of 6.4. The company’s intrinsic value is $611.7, and it has delivered a 34.3% return over the past year. Cummins combines strong gross margins 25.6% with a solid ROIC 16.4%, though recent revenue growth has been slightly negative.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion in clean energy and electrification
- Growth in global infrastructure and transportation
- Product innovation and efficiency gains
- Strategic acquisitions and partnerships
Risk Factors
- Cyclical demand in industrial and automotive sectors
- Margin pressure from input costs
- Regulatory changes in emissions standards
- Global supply chain disruptions
Stock #9: Canadian National Railway Company (CNI)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $60.2B |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $102.0 |
| 1Y Return | -10.1% |
| Revenue | CA$17.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | CA$3,234.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (7.4%) |
| FCF margin | 18.9% |
| Gross margin | 41.3% |
| ROIC | 10.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 96.4% |
Investment Thesis
Canadian National Railway is a leading North American rail operator with a $60.2B market cap and a quality rating of 5.9. The company’s intrinsic value is $102.0, and it maintains a strong FCF margin 18.9% and gross margin 41.3%. While the 1-year return is negative -10.1% and revenue growth is down, CNI’s stable cash generation and moderate leverage (total debt to equity at 96.4%) support long-term resilience.
Key Catalysts
- Cross-border trade and intermodal growth
- Efficiency improvements in rail operations
- Expansion into bulk and containerized freight
- Capital investments in infrastructure
Risk Factors
- Declining revenue growth -7.4%
- Exposure to commodity cycles
- Regulatory and labor risks
- Competition from other rail and trucking firms
Stock #10: L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $54.1B |
| Quality Rating | 5.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $320.3 |
| 1Y Return | 18.0% |
| Revenue | $21.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,462.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.8% |
| FCF margin | 6.7% |
| Gross margin | 23.1% |
| ROIC | 6.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 3.7% |
Investment Thesis
L3Harris is a diversified defense technology company with a $54.1B market cap and a quality rating of 5.6. Its intrinsic value is $320.3, and the company has delivered an 18.0% return over the past year. LHX’s strong gross margin 23.1% and moderate leverage (total debt to equity at 3.7%) highlight operational efficiency and financial discipline.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in defense electronics and communications
- Expansion of government and international contracts
- Innovation in space and cyber solutions
- Strong cash flow generation
Risk Factors
- Dependence on government budgets
- Competitive pressures in defense contracting
- Execution risks in large-scale projects
- Potential for margin volatility
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans defense, logistics, rail, and industrials, providing exposure to both cyclical and defensive sectors. Defense stocks (LMT, GD, NOC, LHX) offer stability and growth tied to government spending, while logistics and rail operators (UPS, FDX, CSX, CNI) benefit from global trade and e-commerce trends. Cummins adds exposure to industrial innovation and clean energy. The mix of high and moderate leverage, varied FCF margins, and sector allocation helps balance risk and return potential.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Entry timing should consider sector rotation, earnings cycles, and macroeconomic signals. Investors may look for:
- Pullbacks in high-quality names for better value entry
- Confirmation of operational turnarounds (e.g., BA, FDX)
- Monitoring of defense contract awards and infrastructure bills
- Gradual accumulation to average entry prices and reduce timing risk
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and a focus on undervalued companies with strong or improving fundamentals in the industrials and logistics sectors.
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; for example, General Dynamics (GD) and Cummins (CMI) have high quality ratings and strong recent returns, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) are leaders in defense with attractive intrinsic value gaps.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
This watchlist is designed for diversification across defense, logistics, rail, and industrials, allowing investors to balance sector-specific risks and opportunities.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include high leverage in some companies, exposure to government budgets and economic cycles, margin pressures, and operational execution challenges.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing may involve buying on pullbacks, after positive earnings or contract announcements, or through gradual accumulation to manage entry risk.
For more in-depth analysis and real-time updates, visit ValueSense and explore our full suite of intrinsic value tools and research products.