10 Best Undervalued Stocks At 52w High for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market environment is characterized by heightened volatility and sector rotation, with investors seeking resilient companies that combine strong fundamentals and attractive valuations. Our selection methodology leverages ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools, focusing on stocks with robust free cash flow, healthy margins, and favorable quality ratings. Each pick is screened for sector diversity, growth potential, and risk profile, ensuring a balanced watchlist for educational analysis.
Featured Stock Analysis
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $289.5B |
| Quality Rating | 6.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $78.2 |
| 1Y Return | 34.4% |
| Revenue | $56.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | $13.3B |
| Revenue Growth | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 23.5% |
| Gross margin | 65.1% |
| ROIC | 13.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 63.3% |
Investment Thesis
Cisco Systems stands out as a technology leader with a market cap of $289.5B and a quality rating of 6.6. The company’s intrinsic value is estimated at $78.2, suggesting upside potential relative to current market pricing. Cisco’s 1-year return of 34.4% reflects strong investor confidence, supported by $56.7B in revenue and a robust free cash flow of $13.3B. The company maintains healthy profitability, with a gross margin of 65.1% and a free cash flow margin of 23.5%. Its ROIC of 13.3% demonstrates efficient capital allocation, while a total debt to equity ratio of 63.3% indicates prudent leverage.
Cisco’s steady revenue growth of 5.3% and its leadership in networking infrastructure position it as a core holding for technology exposure. The company’s focus on recurring software revenue and cloud solutions further enhances its growth profile.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion in cloud networking and cybersecurity
- Transition to subscription-based software models
- Strong enterprise demand for digital transformation
Risk Factors
- Competitive pressures from emerging tech firms
- Exposure to global supply chain disruptions
- Moderate debt levels relative to equity
Cencora (COR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $65.5B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $361.5 |
| 1Y Return | 48.8% |
| Revenue | $316.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,141.6M |
| Revenue Growth | 11.6% |
| FCF margin | 0.4% |
| Gross margin | 3.3% |
| ROIC | 16.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 372.9% |
Investment Thesis
Cencora, with a market cap of $65.5B and a quality rating of 6.2, is a major player in healthcare distribution. Its intrinsic value of $361.5 points to significant valuation support. The company has delivered a remarkable 1-year return of 48.8%, driven by $316.7B in revenue. While its free cash flow margin is modest at 0.4%, Cencora’s revenue growth of 11.6% and ROIC of 16.0% highlight operational efficiency.
Cencora’s scale and integration across the healthcare supply chain enable it to capitalize on industry consolidation and rising demand for pharmaceutical logistics. However, its total debt to equity ratio of 372.9% warrants close monitoring.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in specialty drug distribution
- Expansion of value-added healthcare services
- Strategic partnerships with pharmaceutical manufacturers
Risk Factors
- High leverage and debt servicing requirements
- Regulatory changes impacting healthcare reimbursement
- Margin pressure from competitive pricing
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $55.6B |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $26.4 |
| 1Y Return | 176.1% |
| Revenue | $38.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,065.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (3.7%) |
| FCF margin | 10.6% |
| Gross margin | 52.7% |
| ROIC | (12.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 92.7% |
Investment Thesis
Warner Bros. Discovery, valued at $55.6B with a quality rating of 6.1, has shown exceptional performance with a 1-year return of 176.1%. Its intrinsic value of $26.4 suggests potential upside. The company generated $38.4B in revenue and $4,065.0M in free cash flow, with a gross margin of 52.7%. Despite a negative revenue growth of 3.7% and ROIC of 12.3%, Warner Bros. Discovery’s strong free cash flow margin of 10.6% and diversified media assets position it for long-term recovery.
The company’s focus on streaming, content production, and global distribution networks supports its growth thesis, although integration risks and debt levels remain concerns.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of streaming platforms and original content
- Synergies from recent mergers and acquisitions
- International market penetration
Risk Factors
- Declining traditional media revenues
- High integration and restructuring costs
- Elevated debt-to-equity ratio at 92.7%
Vale S.A. (VALE)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $51.6B |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $27.8 |
| 1Y Return | 18.2% |
| Revenue | $36.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,956.3M |
| Revenue Growth | (14.1%) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% |
| Gross margin | 34.1% |
| ROIC | 13.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 50.1% |
Investment Thesis
Vale S.A., a leading commodities producer, has a market cap of $51.6B and a quality rating of 5.7. Its intrinsic value of $27.8 and 1-year return of 18.2% reflect stable performance. The company reported $36.1B in revenue and $1,956.3M in free cash flow, with a gross margin of 34.1%. Despite a revenue decline of 14.1%, Vale’s ROIC of 13.1% and manageable debt-to-equity ratio of 50.1% underscore its operational resilience.
Vale’s exposure to iron ore and base metals provides diversification benefits, while its focus on cost control and sustainability initiatives supports long-term value creation.
Key Catalysts
- Recovery in global commodity prices
- Expansion of sustainable mining practices
- Strategic investments in logistics and infrastructure
Risk Factors
- Commodity price volatility
- Environmental and regulatory risks
- Cyclical demand fluctuations
Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $45.4B |
| Quality Rating | 6.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $208.8 |
| 1Y Return | 76.5% |
| Revenue | $234.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,452.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 4.4% |
| FCF margin | 1.9% |
| Gross margin | 3.7% |
| ROIC | 47.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | (330.7%) |
Investment Thesis
Cardinal Health, with a market cap of $45.4B and a quality rating of 6.9, is a key healthcare distributor. Its intrinsic value of $208.8 and impressive 1-year return of 76.5% highlight strong market positioning. Cardinal Health generated $234.3B in revenue and $4,452.0M in free cash flow, with a gross margin of 3.7%. The company’s ROIC of 47.4% is notably high, indicating exceptional capital efficiency, though its negative total debt to equity ratio of 330.7% requires further scrutiny.
Cardinal Health’s scale and integration across healthcare logistics make it a strategic asset in the sector, with ongoing innovation in supply chain management.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in medical supply distribution
- Expansion of specialty healthcare services
- Operational efficiency improvements
Risk Factors
- Complex debt structure
- Regulatory and reimbursement risks
- Margin compression in competitive segments
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $33.6B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $16.7 |
| 1Y Return | 20.4% |
| Revenue | SEK 240.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | SEK 30.7B |
| Revenue Growth | (2.6%) |
| FCF margin | 12.8% |
| Gross margin | 46.9% |
| ROIC | 14.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 42.9% |
Investment Thesis
Ericsson, with a market cap of $33.6B and a quality rating of 6.2, is a global leader in telecommunications infrastructure. Its intrinsic value of $16.7 and 1-year return of 20.4% reflect steady performance. Ericsson reported SEK 240.3B in revenue and SEK 30.7B in free cash flow, with a gross margin of 46.9%. Despite a revenue decline of 2.6%, the company’s FCF margin of 12.8% and ROIC of 14.6% indicate solid operational health.
Ericsson’s leadership in 5G deployment and network modernization positions it for future growth, supported by a manageable debt-to-equity ratio of 42.9%.
Key Catalysts
- Global rollout of 5G networks
- Expansion in IoT and enterprise solutions
- Strategic partnerships with telecom operators
Risk Factors
- Intense competition from global peers
- Regulatory and geopolitical risks
- Cyclical capital spending by telecom clients
Fox Corporation (FOXA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.9B |
| Quality Rating | 7.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $111.2 |
| 1Y Return | 54.7% |
| Revenue | $16.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,769.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 14.9% |
| FCF margin | 16.8% |
| Gross margin | 83.4% |
| ROIC | 19.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 53.6% |
Investment Thesis
Fox Corporation, with a market cap of $28.9B and a quality rating of 7.3, is a prominent media company. Its intrinsic value of $111.2 and 1-year return of 54.7% highlight robust performance. Fox generated $16.5B in revenue and $2,769.0M in free cash flow, with an exceptional gross margin of 83.4%. The company’s FCF margin of 16.8% and ROIC of 19.2% underscore its profitability and capital efficiency.
Fox’s diversified media assets and focus on live sports and news content provide resilience against industry disruption, while its debt-to-equity ratio of 53.6% remains manageable.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in digital and streaming platforms
- Expansion of live sports broadcasting
- Strategic content partnerships
Risk Factors
- Shifts in media consumption patterns
- Regulatory and antitrust risks
- Advertising revenue volatility
Fox Corporation (FOX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.1B |
| Quality Rating | 7.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $114.6 |
| 1Y Return | 50.7% |
| Revenue | $16.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,907.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 14.9% |
| FCF margin | 17.6% |
| Gross margin | 64.5% |
| ROIC | 18.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 53.6% |
Investment Thesis
Fox Corporation’s alternate share class (FOX) has a market cap of $26.1B and a quality rating of 7.2. Its intrinsic value of $114.6 and 1-year return of 50.7% mirror the strengths of FOXA, with $16.5B in revenue and $2,907.0M in free cash flow. The company’s FCF margin of 17.6%, gross margin of 64.5%, and ROIC of 18.1% reinforce its solid financial foundation.
FOX shares offer similar exposure to Fox’s media assets, with slight variations in voting rights and capital structure.
Key Catalysts
- Continued growth in digital media
- Expansion of original content production
- Strong performance in live broadcasting
Risk Factors
- Media sector cyclicality
- Regulatory scrutiny
- Competitive pressures
Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. - Eletrobrás (EBR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.3B |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $13.0 |
| 1Y Return | 61.2% |
| Revenue | R$43.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | R$13.6B |
| Revenue Growth | 22.0% |
| FCF margin | 31.2% |
| Gross margin | 47.5% |
| ROIC | 12.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 61.9% |
Investment Thesis
Eletrobrás, with a market cap of $23.3B and a quality rating of 6.4, is a leading utility in Brazil. Its intrinsic value of $13.0 and 1-year return of 61.2% highlight strong momentum. The company reported R$43.7B in revenue and R$13.6B in free cash flow, with a gross margin of 47.5%. Eletrobrás’s revenue growth of 22.0% and FCF margin of 31.2% underscore its operational strength, while its ROIC of 12.1% and debt-to-equity ratio of 61.9% indicate balanced financial management.
Eletrobrás benefits from Brazil’s growing energy demand and investments in renewable infrastructure.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of renewable energy assets
- Privatization and market liberalization
- Infrastructure modernization
Risk Factors
- Regulatory and political risks in Brazil
- Currency volatility
- Capital expenditure requirements
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.0B |
| Quality Rating | 5.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $65.4 |
| 1Y Return | 27.6% |
| Revenue | $4,229.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($75.4M) |
| Revenue Growth | (23.5%) |
| FCF margin | (1.8%) |
| Gross margin | 26.8% |
| ROIC | 8.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 87.8% |
Investment Thesis
SQM, with a market cap of $14.0B and a quality rating of 5.5, is a key player in the global lithium and specialty chemicals market. Its intrinsic value of $65.4 and 1-year return of 27.6% reflect solid performance. The company reported $4,229.9M in revenue, though free cash flow was negative at $75.4M, and revenue growth declined by 23.5%. SQM’s gross margin of 26.8% and ROIC of 8.8% indicate moderate profitability, while its debt-to-equity ratio of 87.8% is elevated.
SQM’s exposure to lithium demand for electric vehicles and energy storage supports its long-term growth thesis, despite near-term margin pressures.
Key Catalysts
- Rising global demand for lithium
- Expansion of specialty chemicals production
- Strategic partnerships in battery supply chains
Risk Factors
- Commodity price fluctuations
- Environmental and regulatory challenges
- High capital intensity
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans technology, healthcare, media, commodities, utilities, and specialty chemicals, providing broad sector exposure. Technology (CSCO, ERIC) offers growth and innovation, healthcare (COR, CAH) delivers defensive stability, media (WBD, FOXA, FOX) adds cyclical upside, while commodities (VALE, SQM) and utilities (EBR) contribute diversification and inflation protection. The balanced allocation mitigates sector-specific risks and supports a resilient portfolio structure.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Entry strategies should consider current market trends, sector rotation, and individual stock momentum. Investors may look for technical support levels, earnings release dates, and macroeconomic catalysts when evaluating timing. Dollar-cost averaging and staggered entry points can help manage volatility and reduce timing risk. Monitoring ValueSense’s intrinsic value ratings and financial health metrics provides additional context for educational analysis.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools and stock screener, focusing on companies with strong fundamentals, attractive valuations, and sector diversity for educational analysis[1][2].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
No single stock is universally “best”; each offers unique strengths. Fox Corporation (FOXA/FOX) has the highest quality rating, while Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) posted the strongest 1-year return. Selection depends on sector preference and risk tolerance.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors—technology, healthcare, media, commodities, and utilities—can help manage risk. The watchlist is designed for educational purposes to illustrate portfolio construction principles.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector-specific volatility, high leverage (notably in Cencora and Cardinal Health), regulatory changes, and commodity price fluctuations. Each stock’s risk profile is detailed in its analysis section.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Market timing depends on individual goals and risk tolerance. Educational strategies include monitoring earnings releases, technical support levels, and using dollar-cost averaging to mitigate timing risk. ValueSense’s tools provide ongoing analysis for informed decision-making[1][2].