10 Best Undervalued Stocks At 52w Low for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market environment is characterized by heightened volatility and sector rotation, with many quality stocks trading near their 52-week lows. Our selection methodology leverages ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools, focusing on companies with strong fundamentals, attractive valuations, and resilient business models. Each pick is screened for quality rating, undervaluation relative to intrinsic value, and sector diversification, ensuring a balanced watchlist for educational analysis[1][2].
Featured Stock Analysis
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $103.9B |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $65.6 |
| 1Y Return | -35.7% |
| Revenue | $123.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $21.0B |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% |
| FCF margin | 17.0% |
| Gross margin | 62.1% |
| ROIC | 8.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 6.0% |
Investment Thesis
Comcast stands out as a leading media and telecommunications conglomerate with a robust revenue base of $123.3B and a market cap of $103.9B. Despite a challenging year (-35.7% 1Y return), its intrinsic value $65.6 signals significant undervaluation. The company’s high gross margin 62.1% and healthy free cash flow $21.0B reinforce its operational strength. Comcast’s diversified business model, spanning cable, broadband, and content, provides defensive qualities in uncertain markets.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion in broadband and streaming services
- Strategic investments in content and technology
- Stable cash flow supporting shareholder returns
- Potential for margin improvement as cost pressures ease
Risk Factors
- Slow revenue growth 0.2% amid industry competition
- Elevated debt levels (Total Debt to Equity: 6.0%)
- Regulatory risks in media and telecom sectors
- Cord-cutting trends impacting legacy cable business
Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $48.0B |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $509.7 |
| 1Y Return | -16.9% |
| Revenue | $7,721.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,460.1M |
| Revenue Growth | 14.0% |
| FCF margin | 31.9% |
| Gross margin | 69.0% |
| ROIC | 5.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 45.8% |
Investment Thesis
Roper Technologies is a diversified technology company with a $48.0B market cap and a strong intrinsic value of $509.7. The firm’s revenue growth 14.0% and high free cash flow margin 31.9% highlight its ability to scale efficiently. Roper’s focus on niche software and engineered products positions it for long-term secular growth, even as its 1Y return -16.9% reflects broader tech sector weakness.
Key Catalysts
- Continued acquisition of high-margin software businesses
- Strong gross margin 69.0% supporting profitability
- Expansion into healthcare and industrial automation
- Resilient recurring revenue streams
Risk Factors
- Elevated debt (Total Debt to Equity: 45.8%)
- Integration risks from ongoing acquisitions
- Sensitivity to macroeconomic cycles
- Moderate ROIC 5.5% compared to peers
Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $31.3B |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $556.0 |
| 1Y Return | -28.6% |
| Revenue | $55.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4,390.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.0% |
| Gross margin | 60.4% |
| ROIC | 11.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 620.4% |
Investment Thesis
Charter Communications, a major player in broadband and cable, has a $31.3B market cap and an intrinsic value of $556.0. Despite a -28.6% 1Y return, Charter’s strong ROIC 11.0% and substantial free cash flow $4,390.0M underscore its ability to generate shareholder value. The company’s gross margin 60.4% and stable revenue base $55.0B provide a foundation for long-term growth.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in high-speed internet subscriptions
- Cost efficiencies through network upgrades
- Strategic pricing power in regional markets
- Potential for consolidation in telecom sector
Risk Factors
- Extremely high leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 620.4%)
- Slow revenue growth 0.2%
- Regulatory scrutiny and competition
- Exposure to cord-cutting trends
Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.3B |
| Quality Rating | 5.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $45.8 |
| 1Y Return | -26.6% |
| Revenue | $31.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $800.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 90.5% |
| FCF margin | 2.6% |
| Gross margin | 19.6% |
| ROIC | 4.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 4.3% |
Investment Thesis
Smurfit Westrock, a leader in packaging solutions, boasts a $19.3B market cap and an impressive revenue growth rate of 90.5%. Its intrinsic value $45.8 suggests upside potential, though its 1Y return -26.6% reflects sector headwinds. The company’s focus on sustainable packaging and global expansion positions it for future growth.
Key Catalysts
- Rapid revenue expansion through mergers and acquisitions
- Increased demand for eco-friendly packaging
- Geographic diversification
- Operational synergies from recent consolidation
Risk Factors
- Low free cash flow margin 2.6%
- Modest gross margin 19.6%
- Competitive pressures in commodity packaging
- Sensitivity to raw material costs
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.1B |
| Quality Rating | 7.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $109.3 |
| 1Y Return | -49.3% |
| Revenue | $5,244.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $979.9M |
| Revenue Growth | 12.6% |
| FCF margin | 18.7% |
| Gross margin | 57.7% |
| ROIC | 74.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 14.2% |
Investment Thesis
Deckers Outdoor, known for its footwear brands, has a $12.1B market cap and a standout quality rating 7.8. Despite a -49.3% 1Y return, its intrinsic value $109.3 and exceptional ROIC 74.0% highlight operational excellence. Deckers’ strong free cash flow margin 18.7% and gross margin 57.7% support its premium positioning in the consumer sector.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of flagship brands (e.g., UGG, HOKA)
- International market growth
- Product innovation driving margin expansion
- Resilient demand for lifestyle footwear
Risk Factors
- Exposure to consumer discretionary cycles
- Competitive pressures from global brands
- Moderate debt levels (Total Debt to Equity: 14.2%)
- Inventory management risks
Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.9B |
| Quality Rating | 5.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $30.4 |
| 1Y Return | -28.7% |
| Revenue | $12.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | $627.7M |
| Revenue Growth | 0.6% |
| FCF margin | 5.2% |
| Gross margin | 16.3% |
| ROIC | 7.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 35.3% |
Investment Thesis
Hormel Foods, a staple in the food industry, commands an $11.9B market cap and an intrinsic value of $30.4. Its 1Y return -28.7% and steady revenue $12.1B reflect defensive qualities. Hormel’s focus on branded protein and value-added products supports stable cash flow, while its gross margin 16.3% and ROIC 7.5% indicate operational resilience.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion into premium and organic food segments
- Brand strength in core categories
- Cost management initiatives
- Potential for margin improvement
Risk Factors
- Low free cash flow margin 5.2%
- Competitive pressures in packaged foods
- Moderate debt (Total Debt to Equity: 35.3%)
- Sensitivity to commodity price fluctuations
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.7B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $156.2 |
| 1Y Return | -51.6% |
| Revenue | $11.7B |
| Free Cash Flow | $819.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.4% |
| FCF margin | 7.0% |
| Gross margin | 53.5% |
| ROIC | 20.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 32.6% |
Investment Thesis
Booz Allen Hamilton, a leader in management consulting, features a $10.7B market cap and an intrinsic value of $156.2. Its 1Y return -51.6% belies strong fundamentals, including a high ROIC 20.4% and gross margin 53.5%. Booz Allen’s expertise in government and defense consulting provides stability and growth potential.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion in cybersecurity and digital transformation services
- Strong government contract pipeline
- Operational efficiency driving margin gains
- Diversification into commercial consulting
Risk Factors
- Moderate free cash flow margin 7.0%
- Exposure to federal budget cycles
- Competitive consulting landscape
- Moderate debt (Total Debt to Equity: 32.6%)
Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.5B |
| Quality Rating | 7.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $251.2 |
| 1Y Return | -10.4% |
| Revenue | $1,959.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | $359.2M |
| Revenue Growth | 10.2% |
| FCF margin | 18.3% |
| Gross margin | 82.4% |
| ROIC | 50.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 4.5% |
Investment Thesis
Paycom Software, a cloud-based HR solutions provider, has a $10.5B market cap and a high intrinsic value $251.2. Its quality rating 7.2, robust gross margin 82.4%, and strong ROIC 50.9% highlight operational strength. Paycom’s double-digit revenue growth 10.2% and free cash flow margin 18.3% support its premium valuation.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of SaaS product offerings
- Growth in enterprise customer base
- High-margin recurring revenue
- Technological innovation in HR management
Risk Factors
- Competitive pressures in HR tech
- Moderate revenue base $1,959.8M
- Sensitivity to enterprise IT spending
- Low debt (Total Debt to Equity: 4.5%)
U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.4B |
| Quality Rating | 5.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $65.9 |
| 1Y Return | -27.5% |
| Revenue | $5,910.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,363.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 3.4% |
| FCF margin | 40.0% |
| Gross margin | 51.8% |
| ROIC | 3.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 95.2% |
Investment Thesis
U-Haul, a leader in self-storage and moving solutions, holds a $10.4B market cap and an intrinsic value of $65.9. Its 1Y return -27.5% and high free cash flow margin 40.0% underscore its cash-generative business. U-Haul’s stable revenue $5,910.6M and gross margin 51.8% reflect its dominant market position.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of self-storage footprint
- Strong brand recognition
- Operational efficiency driving cash flow
- Defensive qualities in economic downturns
Risk Factors
- High leverage (Total Debt to Equity: 95.2%)
- Modest ROIC 3.8%
- Sensitivity to real estate market cycles
- Competitive pressures in storage sector
Instacart (Maplebear Inc.) (CART)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,679.0M |
| Quality Rating | 7.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $61.9 |
| 1Y Return | -16.4% |
| Revenue | $3,546.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $779.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 10.5% |
| FCF margin | 22.0% |
| Gross margin | 74.8% |
| ROIC | 26.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 2.0% |
Investment Thesis
Instacart, a leading online grocery platform, has a $9,679.0M market cap and a high intrinsic value $61.9. Its quality rating 7.3, strong gross margin 74.8%, and ROIC 26.9% highlight its disruptive potential. Instacart’s revenue growth 10.5% and free cash flow margin 22.0% support its rapid scaling in a competitive sector.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of delivery and logistics services
- Partnerships with major grocery chains
- Technological innovation in e-commerce
- Growth in online grocery adoption
Risk Factors
- Competitive pressures from larger e-commerce players
- Moderate revenue base $3,546.0M
- Sensitivity to consumer spending trends
- Low debt (Total Debt to Equity: 2.0%)
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans multiple sectors—technology, consumer, industrials, food, and logistics—providing broad diversification. Exposure to both defensive (Hormel, U-Haul) and growth-oriented (Paycom, Instacart) stocks helps balance risk and return. The inclusion of high-margin tech and resilient consumer brands mitigates sector-specific volatility, while companies with strong free cash flow and operational efficiency anchor portfolio stability.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given the prevalence of 52-week lows and recent market corrections, these stocks may offer attractive entry points for long-term analysis. Investors can consider dollar-cost averaging or staged entry strategies to mitigate timing risk. Monitoring sector rotation and macroeconomic indicators can further inform entry decisions, while ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools help identify undervalued opportunities[1][2].
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools, focusing on companies trading near 52-week lows with strong fundamentals, attractive valuations, and sector diversification[1][2].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; high-quality ratings and strong ROIC highlight Deckers Outdoor (DECK) and Paycom Software (PAYC) as standouts, while Comcast (CMCSA) and Instacart (CART) show significant undervaluation potential.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors and business models is recommended for risk management. This watchlist is designed to provide educational insights into building a balanced portfolio.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include sector-specific headwinds, elevated debt levels (notably Charter and U-Haul), competitive pressures, and sensitivity to macroeconomic cycles. Each stock’s risk profile is detailed in its analysis section.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Market corrections and 52-week lows may present favorable entry points. Consider staged entry strategies and use ValueSense’s intrinsic value analysis to identify optimal timing.