10 Best Undervalued Stocks for October 2025

10 Best Undervalued Stocks for October 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The current market environment is defined by rapid technological innovation, evolving healthcare demands, and global shifts in commodities and manufacturing. ValueSense’s stock selection methodology prioritizes intrinsic value, quality ratings, and growth metrics to identify companies trading below their estimated worth. Each pick is evaluated for sector leadership, financial health, and potential catalysts, ensuring a diversified and resilient watchlist. Stocks are chosen based on their ValueSense ratings, robust financials, and sector representation, with a focus on long-term value and risk-adjusted growth.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM)

MetricValue
Market Cap$1,554.9B
Quality Rating8.3
Intrinsic Value$398.9
1Y Return60.3%
RevenueNT$3,401.2B
Free Cash FlowNT$947.9B
Revenue Growth39.5%
FCF margin27.9%
Gross margin58.6%
ROIC34.6%
Total Debt to Equity0.0%

Investment Thesis

TSMC stands as the world’s largest pure-play semiconductor foundry, powering global technology giants with advanced chip manufacturing. Its dominant market position, zero debt, and exceptional financial performance make it a cornerstone for technology-focused portfolios. With a market cap of $1,554.9B and a quality rating of 8.3, TSMC demonstrates both scale and operational excellence. The company’s intrinsic value $398.9 is notably above current trading levels, suggesting significant upside.

Recent revenue growth of 39.5% and a 1-year return of 60.3% highlight TSMC’s ability to capitalize on surging demand for high-performance chips. Its ROIC 34.6% and gross margin 58.6% reflect industry-leading efficiency and profitability.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion in AI, automotive, and high-performance computing chips
  • Strategic partnerships with leading tech firms
  • Zero debt, enabling flexibility for R&D and capital investments
  • Robust free cash flow (NT$947.9B) supporting shareholder returns

Risk Factors

  • Geopolitical tensions impacting supply chain stability
  • Cyclical nature of semiconductor demand
  • Currency fluctuations affecting international revenue

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B)

MetricValue
Market Cap$1,055.2B
Quality Rating6.0
Intrinsic Value$706.1
1Y Return5.0%
Revenue$370.2B
Free Cash Flow$8,225.0M
Revenue Growth0.0%
FCF margin2.2%
Gross margin24.2%
ROIC11.3%
Total Debt to Equity19.0%

Investment Thesis

Berkshire Hathaway is a diversified conglomerate led by Warren Buffett, with holdings spanning insurance, energy, consumer goods, and industrials. Its market cap of $1,055.2B and quality rating of 6.0 reflect stability and scale, though recent performance has been subdued (1Y return: 5.0%). The intrinsic value $706.1 remains attractive for long-term investors seeking exposure to a broad array of sectors.

Berkshire’s conservative balance sheet (total debt to equity: 19.0%) and steady free cash flow ($8,225.0M) support ongoing capital allocation flexibility. While revenue growth is flat (0.0%), the company’s ability to weather market cycles and deploy capital opportunistically remains a key strength.

Key Catalysts

  • Strategic acquisitions and share buybacks
  • Defensive positioning in volatile markets
  • Strong insurance and reinsurance operations

Risk Factors

  • Slower growth compared to tech-focused peers
  • Succession planning and leadership transition risks
  • Exposure to cyclical industries

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)

MetricValue
Market Cap$402.0B
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$287.2
1Y Return20.2%
Revenue$58.3B
Free Cash Flow$18.2B
Revenue Growth6.1%
FCF margin31.3%
Gross margin74.3%
ROIC12.6%
Total Debt to Equity(51,073.2%)

Investment Thesis

AbbVie is a leading pharmaceutical company with a robust pipeline and strong cash generation. Its market cap of $402.0B and quality rating of 6.1 position it as a major player in healthcare. The company’s intrinsic value $287.2 and 1Y return 20.2% indicate solid growth prospects, driven by innovative therapies and expansion in immunology and oncology.

AbbVie’s gross margin 74.3% and FCF margin 31.3% underscore its profitability, while a high free cash flow $18.2B supports ongoing R&D and shareholder returns. However, the total debt to equity -51,073.2% signals a highly leveraged balance sheet, warranting close monitoring.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of immunology and oncology drug portfolio
  • Strong pipeline of late-stage therapies
  • High free cash flow enabling dividends and buybacks

Risk Factors

  • Patent expirations and generic competition
  • Regulatory risks in drug approvals
  • Elevated leverage and debt servicing concerns

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

MetricValue
Market Cap$324.6B
Quality Rating6.7
Intrinsic Value$603.8
1Y Return-37.1%
Revenue$421.2B
Free Cash Flow$25.3B
Revenue Growth10.5%
FCF margin6.0%
Gross margin20.5%
ROIC21.5%
Total Debt to Equity75.6%

Investment Thesis

UnitedHealth Group is the largest U.S. health insurer, integrating insurance and healthcare services. Despite a market cap of $324.6B and a quality rating of 6.7, the company has faced recent headwinds (1Y return: -37.1%). Its intrinsic value $603.8 and strong revenue growth 10.5% suggest potential for recovery as healthcare demand rises.

UnitedHealth’s free cash flow $25.3B and ROIC 21.5% reflect operational strength, while its total debt to equity 75.6% is manageable given its cash generation.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in managed care and healthcare services
  • Expansion of digital health initiatives
  • Aging population driving insurance demand

Risk Factors

  • Regulatory changes affecting reimbursement rates
  • Competitive pressures in insurance markets
  • Recent share price volatility

SAP SE (SAP)

MetricValue
Market Cap$314.8B
Quality Rating6.9
Intrinsic Value$309.2
1Y Return17.6%
Revenue€35.9B
Free Cash Flow€6,491.0M
Revenue Growth10.3%
FCF margin18.1%
Gross margin73.5%
ROIC15.1%
Total Debt to Equity21.2%

Investment Thesis

SAP is a global leader in enterprise software, enabling digital transformation for businesses worldwide. With a market cap of $314.8B and a quality rating of 6.9, SAP offers stable growth and high margins. The company’s intrinsic value $309.2 and 1Y return 17.6% reflect resilience in a competitive sector.

SAP’s gross margin 73.5% and FCF margin 18.1% highlight strong profitability, while revenue growth 10.3% signals ongoing demand for cloud and analytics solutions.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion in cloud computing and AI-driven analytics
  • Strong European and global enterprise client base
  • Consistent free cash flow generation

Risk Factors

  • Intense competition from U.S. tech giants
  • Currency risk due to global operations
  • Integration challenges with new acquisitions

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

MetricValue
Market Cap$273.6B
Quality Rating6.9
Intrinsic Value$77.8
1Y Return23.4%
Revenue$56.7B
Free Cash Flow$13.3B
Revenue Growth5.3%
FCF margin23.5%
Gross margin65.1%
ROIC13.3%
Total Debt to Equity63.3%

Investment Thesis

Cisco is a networking and cybersecurity leader, serving enterprise and government clients globally. Its market cap of $273.6B and quality rating of 6.9 reflect stability and innovation. The intrinsic value $77.8 and 1Y return 23.4% indicate ongoing demand for secure connectivity and cloud infrastructure.

Cisco’s gross margin 65.1% and FCF margin 23.5% support robust profitability, while revenue growth 5.3% shows steady expansion. The company’s total debt to equity 63.3% is manageable given its cash flow.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in cybersecurity and cloud networking
  • Expansion in subscription-based software
  • Strong enterprise demand for digital infrastructure

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressures from emerging tech firms
  • Supply chain disruptions impacting hardware
  • Currency and geopolitical risks

Novartis AG (NVS)

MetricValue
Market Cap$254.7B
Quality Rating7.3
Intrinsic Value$141.9
1Y Return12.2%
Revenue$54.6B
Free Cash Flow$16.8B
Revenue Growth13.3%
FCF margin30.8%
Gross margin56.0%
ROIC20.0%
Total Debt to Equity77.6%

Investment Thesis

Novartis is a global pharmaceutical giant with a focus on innovative medicines and generics. Its market cap of $254.7B and quality rating of 7.3 position it as a leader in healthcare. The intrinsic value $141.9 and 1Y return 12.2% reflect steady growth and resilience.

Novartis’s gross margin 56.0% and FCF margin 30.8% highlight profitability, while revenue growth 13.3% signals ongoing demand for its therapies. The company’s total debt to equity 77.6% is offset by strong cash generation.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of oncology and specialty drug portfolio
  • Growth in emerging markets
  • Strong pipeline of innovative therapies

Risk Factors

  • Patent expirations and competition from generics
  • Regulatory and pricing pressures
  • Currency risk due to global operations

Toyota Motor Corporation (TM)

MetricValue
Market Cap$254.7B
Quality Rating6.3
Intrinsic Value$465.8
1Y Return13.9%
Revenue¥48.5T
Free Cash Flow¥44.4B
Revenue Growth4.5%
FCF margin0.1%
Gross margin19.3%
ROIC8.0%
Total Debt to Equity103.9%

Investment Thesis

Toyota is a global automotive leader, renowned for innovation in hybrid and electric vehicles. Its market cap of $254.7B and quality rating of 6.3 reflect scale and reliability. The intrinsic value $465.8 and 1Y return 13.9% suggest moderate upside, supported by strong brand and manufacturing efficiency.

Toyota’s gross margin 19.3% and ROIC 8.0% indicate solid operational performance, though its FCF margin 0.1% is low due to capital-intensive operations. The company’s total debt to equity 103.9% is high, reflecting industry norms.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion in electric and hybrid vehicle production
  • Strong global distribution network
  • Innovation in autonomous driving technologies

Risk Factors

  • Cyclical demand and economic sensitivity
  • Regulatory changes in emissions standards
  • High leverage and capital requirements

Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO)

MetricValue
Market Cap$249.4B
Quality Rating6.5
Intrinsic Value$79.2
1Y Return-52.5%
RevenueDKK 311.9B
Free Cash FlowDKK 62.0B
Revenue Growth20.9%
FCF margin19.9%
Gross margin83.9%
ROIC29.7%
Total Debt to Equity59.1%

Investment Thesis

Novo Nordisk is a leader in diabetes care and biopharmaceuticals, with a market cap of $249.4B and quality rating of 6.5. Despite a 1Y return of -52.5%, the company’s intrinsic value $79.2 and strong revenue growth 20.9% suggest potential for recovery as demand for diabetes and obesity treatments rises.

Novo Nordisk’s gross margin 83.9% and ROIC 29.7% highlight exceptional profitability and capital efficiency. The company’s total debt to equity 59.1% is manageable.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of diabetes and obesity drug portfolio
  • Growth in emerging markets
  • Strong R&D pipeline

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressures in biopharma
  • Regulatory and pricing risks
  • Recent share price volatility

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM)

MetricValue
Market Cap$235.2B
Quality Rating6.8
Intrinsic Value$280.1
1Y Return-15.3%
Revenue$39.5B
Free Cash Flow$12.5B
Revenue Growth8.3%
FCF margin31.6%
Gross margin77.6%
ROIC10.8%
Total Debt to Equity4.6%

Investment Thesis

Salesforce is a global leader in cloud-based CRM and enterprise software. Its market cap of $235.2B and quality rating of 6.8 reflect strong market positioning. Despite a 1Y return of -15.3%, the intrinsic value $280.1 and revenue growth 8.3% indicate ongoing demand for digital transformation solutions.

Salesforce’s gross margin 77.6% and FCF margin 31.6% highlight profitability, while its total debt to equity 4.6% is low, supporting financial flexibility.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion in AI-driven CRM and analytics
  • Growth in enterprise cloud adoption
  • Strong recurring revenue model

Risk Factors

  • Intense competition from other cloud providers
  • Integration risks with acquisitions
  • Recent share price volatility

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This watchlist offers broad sector diversification across technology (TSM, SAP, CSCO, CRM), healthcare (ABBV, UNH, NVS, NVO), consumer/industrial (TM), and financials (BRK-B).
- Technology stocks provide growth and innovation exposure. - Healthcare picks add defensive characteristics and long-term demand stability. - Consumer/industrial and financials balance cyclical and non-cyclical risk.

Allocating across these sectors can help mitigate volatility and capture opportunities in multiple market cycles.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Entry timing should consider sector rotation, earnings cycles, and macro trends.
- Technology and healthcare stocks may benefit from long-term dollar-cost averaging due to innovation cycles. - Defensive picks like BRK-B and UNH can be considered during market uncertainty. - Monitor earnings releases, regulatory updates, and macroeconomic indicators for optimal entry points.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value tools, quality ratings, and financial metrics, focusing on undervalued companies with strong growth prospects and sector leadership.

Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; TSMC stands out for its high quality rating and robust growth, but the best pick depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification across sectors and companies can help manage risk and capture opportunities; this watchlist is designed for balanced exposure rather than concentrated bets.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector-specific challenges, regulatory changes, market volatility, and company-specific factors such as debt levels and competition.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing depends on market conditions, earnings cycles, and macroeconomic trends; consider dollar-cost averaging and monitoring key catalysts for each stock.