10 Best Horizontal Saas for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The current market landscape is defined by heightened volatility, sector rotation, and a renewed focus on company fundamentals. ValueSense’s methodology leverages a blend of quantitative and qualitative analysis, using proprietary intrinsic value models, quality ratings, and sector diversification to identify stocks with strong upside potential and manageable risk profiles[1][2]. Our selection process emphasizes:
- Undervalued stocks based on intrinsic value calculations
- Quality ratings reflecting financial health and operational efficiency
- Growth catalysts and sector trends
- Balanced sector allocation for diversification
Featured Stock Analysis
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.9B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $210.9 |
| 1Y Return | -11.3% |
| Revenue | $2,847.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | $669.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 19.0% |
| FCF margin | 23.5% |
| Gross margin | 84.6% |
| ROIC | (8.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 13.6% |
Investment Thesis
HubSpot is a leader in cloud-based CRM and marketing automation, serving a broad range of businesses seeking digital transformation. Despite a recent 1-year return of -11.3%, the company demonstrates robust fundamentals, with $2.85B in revenue and a strong free cash flow of $669.5M. Its high gross margin of 84.6% and a healthy FCF margin of 23.5% underscore operational efficiency. The ValueSense intrinsic value estimate of $210.9 suggests the stock may be undervalued relative to its current market cap of $25.9B.
HubSpot’s 19% revenue growth signals continued demand for its SaaS solutions, even as the company navigates a challenging macro environment. The quality rating of 6.2 reflects solid execution, though the negative ROIC -8.3% and modest debt-to-equity ratio 13.6% warrant monitoring.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of digital marketing and CRM adoption among SMBs and enterprises
- Continued innovation in AI-driven marketing tools
- Potential for margin expansion as scale increases
Risk Factors
- Negative ROIC indicating capital efficiency concerns
- Competitive SaaS landscape with pressure from larger incumbents
- Sensitivity to macroeconomic slowdowns affecting client budgets
NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.7B |
| Quality Rating | 6.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $127.4 |
| 1Y Return | 2.6% |
| Revenue | $6,588.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,658.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 3.3% |
| FCF margin | 25.2% |
| Gross margin | 70.0% |
| ROIC | 27.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 281.5% |
Investment Thesis
NetApp is a global leader in hybrid cloud data management, with a $23.7B market cap and a quality rating of 6.9. The company’s intrinsic value is pegged at $127.4, and it has delivered a modest 1-year return of 2.6%. NetApp’s financials are robust: $6.59B in revenue, $1.66B in free cash flow, and a sector-leading FCF margin of 25.2%. Its gross margin of 70% and an impressive ROIC of 27.5% highlight operational excellence.
Despite moderate revenue growth 3.3%, NetApp’s high debt-to-equity ratio 281.5% is a notable risk, though its cash generation capacity provides a buffer. The company is well-positioned to benefit from ongoing enterprise cloud migration and data storage demand.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in hybrid and multi-cloud adoption
- Expansion of data services and AI-driven analytics
- Strategic partnerships with hyperscale cloud providers
Risk Factors
- Elevated debt levels increasing financial risk
- Slower top-line growth compared to peers
- Technology disruption risk in the data storage sector
CMS Energy Corporation (CMS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.0B |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $50.8 |
| 1Y Return | 7.3% |
| Revenue | $8,295.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,032.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 11.0% |
| FCF margin | 12.4% |
| Gross margin | 31.8% |
| ROIC | 10.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | (51.7%) |
Investment Thesis
CMS Energy is a diversified utility company with a $22.0B market cap and a quality rating of 5.8. The stock has posted a 1-year return of 7.3%, reflecting its defensive characteristics. With $8.3B in revenue and $1.03B in free cash flow, CMS maintains a solid FCF margin of 12.4% and a gross margin of 31.8%. The company’s intrinsic value is $50.8, suggesting a fair valuation relative to peers.
CMS’s 11% revenue growth and 10.4% ROIC indicate efficient capital deployment. The negative total debt-to-equity ratio -51.7% is unusual and may reflect accounting or capital structure nuances, but overall financial health appears stable.
Key Catalysts
- Ongoing investment in renewable energy and grid modernization
- Stable cash flows from regulated utility operations
- Population and economic growth in service regions
Risk Factors
- Regulatory and political risks affecting utility rates
- High capital expenditure requirements
- Exposure to interest rate fluctuations
CGI Inc. (GIB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.3B |
| Quality Rating | 5.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $137.5 |
| 1Y Return | -21.3% |
| Revenue | CA$15.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | CA$1,935.3M |
| Revenue Growth | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% |
| Gross margin | 16.3% |
| ROIC | 4.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 41.6% |
Investment Thesis
CGI Inc. is a global IT consulting and systems integration firm with a $19.3B market cap and a quality rating of 5.4. Despite a 1-year return of -21.3%, CGI generates CA$15.5B in revenue and CA$1.94B in free cash flow, with a FCF margin of 12.5%. The company’s intrinsic value is CA$137.5, and its gross margin stands at 16.3%.
CGI’s 7% revenue growth and 4.8% ROIC suggest steady, if unspectacular, performance. The debt-to-equity ratio of 41.6% is manageable, supporting ongoing investments in digital transformation projects.
Key Catalysts
- Rising demand for digital transformation and cybersecurity services
- Expansion into new international markets
- Recurring revenue from long-term government and enterprise contracts
Risk Factors
- Margin pressure from competitive IT services landscape
- Currency fluctuations impacting international earnings
- Project execution risks in large-scale contracts
GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18.3B |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $162.1 |
| 1Y Return | -20.2% |
| Revenue | $3,605.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | $327.3M |
| Revenue Growth | (19.5%) |
| FCF margin | 9.1% |
| Gross margin | 63.8% |
| ROIC | 28.7% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 87.9% |
Investment Thesis
GoDaddy is a leading provider of domain registration and web hosting services, with a market cap of $18.3B and a quality rating of 5.8. The company’s intrinsic value is $162.1, but it has experienced a 1-year return of -20.2%. GoDaddy reported $3.61B in revenue and $327.3M in free cash flow, with a FCF margin of 9.1% and a gross margin of 63.8%.
Despite a revenue decline of 19.5%, GoDaddy’s high ROIC 28.7% and manageable debt-to-equity ratio 87.9% highlight its ability to generate returns and manage leverage.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in global small business digitalization
- Expansion of value-added services (e.g., e-commerce, security)
- Upselling to existing customer base
Risk Factors
- Revenue contraction and competitive pricing pressures
- Dependence on small business formation trends
- High customer acquisition costs
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,908.8M |
| Quality Rating | 5.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $0.6 |
| 1Y Return | 0.8% |
| Revenue | $2,000.0K |
| Free Cash Flow | ($608.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | N/A |
| FCF margin | (30,400.0%) |
| Gross margin | (1,700.0%) |
| ROIC | (103.8%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 4.7% |
Investment Thesis
Aurora Innovation is an autonomous vehicle technology company with a $9.9B market cap and a quality rating of 5.0. The company’s intrinsic value is $0.6, and it has posted a minimal 1-year return of 0.8%. Aurora’s revenue is nascent at $2M, with negative free cash flow -$608M and extreme FCF and gross margin figures, reflecting early-stage, high-investment operations.
The company’s negative ROIC -103.8% and modest debt-to-equity ratio 4.7% highlight the speculative nature of the business, which is focused on long-term commercialization of autonomous driving technology.
Key Catalysts
- Progress in autonomous vehicle pilot programs
- Strategic partnerships with automotive OEMs
- Regulatory advancements supporting AV deployment
Risk Factors
- High cash burn and uncertain path to profitability
- Technology and regulatory hurdles
- Competitive landscape with well-funded rivals
Applied Digital Corporation (APLD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,869.2M |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $1.3 |
| 1Y Return | 412.7% |
| Revenue | $219.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($573.7M) |
| Revenue Growth | 36.0% |
| FCF margin | (261.9%) |
| Gross margin | 14.5% |
| ROIC | (6.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 63.2% |
Investment Thesis
Applied Digital operates in the digital infrastructure and data center sector, with a market cap of $8.87B and a quality rating of 6.1. The company’s intrinsic value is $1.3, and it has delivered a remarkable 1-year return of 412.7%. Applied Digital reported $219M in revenue, but negative free cash flow -$573.7M and a FCF margin of -261.9% reflect aggressive investment in growth.
With 36% revenue growth and a gross margin of 14.5%, the company is scaling rapidly, though negative ROIC -6.7% and a debt-to-equity ratio of 63.2% highlight financial risks.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of data center capacity for AI and cloud workloads
- Rising demand for high-performance computing infrastructure
- Strategic customer wins in digital services
Risk Factors
- High capital intensity and negative cash flow
- Execution risk in scaling operations
- Market volatility in digital infrastructure demand
ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,590.7M |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $3,985.9 |
| 1Y Return | -6.6% |
| Revenue | $866.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | $24.7B |
| Revenue Growth | 24.4% |
| FCF margin | 2,849.1% |
| Gross margin | 67.9% |
| ROIC | (0.0%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 3.7% |
Investment Thesis
ServiceTitan is a SaaS platform for field service management, with a market cap of $8.59B and a quality rating of 5.8. The company’s intrinsic value is $3,985.9, and it has posted a 1-year return of -6.6%. ServiceTitan reported $866.4M in revenue and an unusually high free cash flow of $24.7B, with a FCF margin of 2,849.1%—likely reflecting a one-time event or accounting anomaly.
The company’s 24.4% revenue growth and gross margin of 67.9% are strong, while the near-zero ROIC and low debt-to-equity ratio 3.7% indicate prudent capital management.
Key Catalysts
- Growing adoption of digital tools in home and commercial services
- Expansion into new verticals and geographies
- Cross-selling and upselling to existing customers
Risk Factors
- Market saturation in core segments
- Dependence on economic cycles affecting service industries
- Potential for margin compression as competition increases
UiPath Inc. (PATH)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,503.6M |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $27.0 |
| 1Y Return | 28.3% |
| Revenue | $1,496.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | $309.6M |
| Revenue Growth | 8.3% |
| FCF margin | 20.7% |
| Gross margin | 82.9% |
| ROIC | (6.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 4.4% |
Investment Thesis
UiPath is a leader in robotic process automation (RPA), with a market cap of $8.5B and a quality rating of 5.9. The company’s intrinsic value is $27.0, and it has delivered a 1-year return of 28.3%. UiPath reported $1.5B in revenue and $309.6M in free cash flow, with a FCF margin of 20.7% and a gross margin of 82.9%.
With 8.3% revenue growth and a negative ROIC -6.3%, UiPath is balancing growth investments with profitability. The low debt-to-equity ratio 4.4% supports financial flexibility.
Key Catalysts
- Rising enterprise adoption of automation and AI
- Expansion of product suite and ecosystem partnerships
- Increasing demand for efficiency in global operations
Risk Factors
- Competitive pressures from large software vendors
- Execution risk in scaling enterprise sales
- Technology adoption cycles
Confluent, Inc. (CFLT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,090.6M |
| Quality Rating | 5.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $29.0 |
| 1Y Return | -10.7% |
| Revenue | $1,113.1M |
| Free Cash Flow | $53.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 21.6% |
| FCF margin | 4.8% |
| Gross margin | 74.1% |
| ROIC | (62.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 98.9% |
Investment Thesis
Confluent is a data streaming platform provider with a market cap of $8.09B and a quality rating of 5.0. The company’s intrinsic value is $29.0, and it has posted a 1-year return of -10.7%. Confluent reported $1.11B in revenue and $53.5M in free cash flow, with a FCF margin of 4.8% and a gross margin of 74.1%.
With 21.6% revenue growth and a negative ROIC -62.7%, Confluent is investing heavily in scaling its platform. The high debt-to-equity ratio 98.9% is a risk, but the company’s position in the fast-growing data infrastructure market is a key opportunity.
Key Catalysts
- Accelerating adoption of real-time data streaming in enterprises
- Expansion of cloud-native offerings
- Strategic partnerships with major cloud providers
Risk Factors
- High leverage and negative returns on capital
- Intense competition from established cloud vendors
- Customer concentration risk
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans multiple sectors—technology (HUBS, NTAP, GIB, GDDY, TTAN, PATH, CFLT), utilities (CMS), and emerging tech (AUR, APLD)—providing a balanced mix of growth, stability, and speculative upside. The inclusion of both established cash generators (NTAP, CMS) and high-growth disruptors (APLD, TTAN, PATH) helps mitigate sector-specific risks while enhancing overall return potential. The portfolio’s sector allocation is designed to capture trends in digital transformation, automation, and infrastructure, while maintaining exposure to defensive utilities for stability.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given current market volatility, a dollar-cost averaging approach may help smooth entry points across these diverse stocks. Investors may consider monitoring technical support levels and earnings announcements for optimal timing. For speculative names (AUR, APLD), position sizing and risk controls are essential. ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools and backtesting features can further inform entry and allocation decisions[1][2].
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screening tools, which combine intrinsic value analysis, quality ratings, and sector diversification to identify companies with strong fundamentals and growth potential[1][2].
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
No single stock is universally “best,” as each offers unique risk/reward characteristics. The list includes high-quality growth names, stable utilities, and speculative opportunities, allowing investors to align choices with their own objectives.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is a key principle in portfolio construction. This watchlist is designed to provide exposure across sectors and risk profiles, but allocation should be tailored to individual goals and risk tolerance.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks vary by stock and sector, including high leverage (NTAP, CFLT), negative cash flow (AUR, APLD), competitive pressures (HUBS, GDDY, PATH), and regulatory risks (CMS, AUR). Review each analysis for specific concerns.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Market timing is inherently uncertain. Consider dollar-cost averaging, monitoring earnings releases, and using ValueSense’s intrinsic value and backtesting tools to inform entry points and position sizing[1][2].