6 Best Price Comparison for October 2025

6 Best Price Comparison for October 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The 2025 equity landscape is defined by volatility, sector rotation, and a renewed focus on intrinsic value. At ValueSense, our methodology emphasizes companies trading below their estimated intrinsic value, with strong free cash flow, resilient margins, and prudent capital structures. We screen for stocks across sectors—technology, healthcare, and financial services—prioritizing those with robust fundamentals, positive cash flow, and clear growth catalysts. Each pick is supported by ValueSense’s proprietary quality rating and a transparent breakdown of key financial metrics.

Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD)

MetricValue
Market Cap$1,556.3M
Quality Rating6.0
Intrinsic Value$138.6
1Y Return-20.4%
Revenue$1,447.2M
Free Cash Flow$233.1M
Revenue Growth5.9%
FCF margin16.1%
Gross margin82.4%
ROIC3.0%
Total Debt to Equity47.0%

Investment Thesis

Ziff Davis, Inc. stands out as a diversified digital media and internet company with a market cap of $1.56B. Despite a challenging year (-20.4% 1Y return), ZD’s fundamentals highlight resilience: $1.45B in revenue, $233.1M in free cash flow, and a robust 16.1% FCF margin. The company’s intrinsic value is estimated at $138.6 per share, suggesting significant upside potential. With a high gross margin of 82.4% and a moderate debt-to-equity ratio 47%, Ziff Davis is positioned to weather market turbulence and capitalize on digital advertising and subscription trends.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion in digital media and SaaS verticals
  • High gross margins supporting reinvestment
  • Potential for margin improvement and cost optimization
  • Undervaluation relative to intrinsic value

Risk Factors

  • Sluggish revenue growth 5.9%
  • Modest ROIC 3.0% indicating limited capital efficiency
  • Exposure to cyclical advertising markets

GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$1,433.6M
Quality Rating7.0
Intrinsic Value$15.0
1Y Return-42.2%
Revenue$799.9M
Free Cash Flow$157.6M
Revenue Growth3.2%
FCF margin19.7%
Gross margin91.2%
ROIC9.6%
Total Debt to Equity85.1%

Investment Thesis

GoodRx Holdings, Inc. operates at the intersection of healthcare and technology, providing prescription savings solutions. Despite a -42.2% 1Y return, GDRX maintains a $1.43B market cap and a strong quality rating of 7.0. The company’s $799.9M in revenue and $157.6M in free cash flow (19.7% FCF margin) reflect a scalable business model. With an intrinsic value of $15.0 per share, GoodRx appears undervalued, especially given its sector-leading 91.2% gross margin and improving operational efficiency.

Key Catalysts

  • High gross and FCF margins support reinvestment
  • Growing adoption of digital health solutions
  • Expansion into new healthcare verticals
  • Strong brand recognition in consumer healthcare

Risk Factors

  • Slower revenue growth 3.2%
  • Elevated debt-to-equity 85.1%
  • Competitive pressures from larger healthcare platforms

QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST)

MetricValue
Market Cap$829.2M
Quality Rating6.4
Intrinsic Value$9.4
1Y Return-25.9%
Revenue$1,093.7M
Free Cash Flow$80.5M
Revenue Growth78.3%
FCF margin7.4%
Gross margin10.1%
ROIC2.0%
Total Debt to Equity3.0%

Investment Thesis

QuinStreet, Inc. is a performance marketing leader with a market cap of $829.2M. The company’s revenue surged 78.3% year-over-year to $1.09B, reflecting aggressive growth in digital lead generation. While the 1Y return is -25.9%, QNST’s intrinsic value of $9.4 per share and a solid quality rating 6.4 highlight its long-term potential. The company’s low debt-to-equity 3.0% and positive free cash flow $80.5M provide a stable foundation for future expansion.

Key Catalysts

  • Rapid revenue growth in digital marketing
  • Low leverage supports financial flexibility
  • Expansion into new verticals and geographies
  • Improving operational efficiency

Risk Factors

  • Low gross margin 10.1% limits profitability
  • Modest FCF margin 7.4%
  • Volatility in digital advertising demand

EverQuote, Inc. (EVER)

MetricValue
Market Cap$741.8M
Quality Rating7.9
Intrinsic Value$87.6
1Y Return1.7%
Revenue$615.2M
Free Cash Flow$89.9M
Revenue Growth92.9%
FCF margin14.6%
Gross margin96.6%
ROIC126.6%
Total Debt to Equity3.0%

Investment Thesis

EverQuote, Inc. is a digital insurance marketplace with a $741.8M market cap and a standout quality rating of 7.9. The company delivered 92.9% revenue growth to $615.2M and a positive 1Y return 1.7%. EverQuote’s free cash flow of $89.9M (14.6% margin) and an exceptional ROIC of 126.6% underscore its capital efficiency. The intrinsic value is estimated at $87.6 per share, suggesting meaningful upside for long-term investors.

Key Catalysts

  • Explosive revenue growth and high ROIC
  • Leading position in digital insurance aggregation
  • High gross margin 96.6%
  • Low debt-to-equity 3.0% enhances stability

Risk Factors

  • Market competition from larger insurance platforms
  • Potential volatility in insurance demand
  • Need for continued innovation to sustain growth

MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (MNY)

MetricValue
Market Cap$49.0M
Quality Rating4.3
Intrinsic Value$11.3
1Y Return7.5%
Revenue$69.0M
Free Cash Flow$0.0
Revenue Growth(22.1%)
FCF margin0.0%
Gross margin49.0%
ROIC(572.5%)
Total Debt to Equity2.1%

Investment Thesis

MoneyHero Limited is a fintech platform with a $49.0M market cap, targeting financial product comparison in Asia. Despite a small scale, MNY posted a 7.5% 1Y return and an intrinsic value of $11.3 per share. However, the company faces headwinds with negative revenue growth -22.1% and zero free cash flow. The gross margin stands at 49.0%, and the quality rating is 4.3, indicating a speculative profile.

Key Catalysts

  • Niche focus on Asian fintech markets
  • Potential for digital financial product adoption
  • Low debt-to-equity 2.1% supports balance sheet stability

Risk Factors

  • Negative revenue growth and no free cash flow
  • Low quality rating and high business risk
  • Negative ROIC -572.5% signals operational challenges

Advent Technologies Holdings, Inc. (ADN)

MetricValue
Market Cap$10.1M
Quality Rating5.3
Intrinsic Value$325.0
1Y Return117.1%
Revenue$115.0K
Free Cash Flow$4,965.0K
Revenue Growth(98.4%)
FCF margin4,317.4%
Gross margin(1,319.1%)
ROIC254.3%
Total Debt to Equity(5.7%)

Investment Thesis

Advent Technologies Holdings, Inc. is a micro-cap clean energy company ($10.1M market cap) with a volatile profile. The stock delivered a 117.1% 1Y return, but revenue is minimal $115K and declining -98.4%. Despite this, ADN boasts a remarkable FCF margin 4,317.4% and a high ROIC 254.3%, likely reflecting one-off financial events. The intrinsic value is $325.0 per share, but the quality rating 5.3 and negative gross margin -1,319.1% highlight significant risk.

Key Catalysts

  • Exposure to clean energy and hydrogen tech
  • Potential for technology licensing or partnerships
  • High FCF margin and ROIC (caution: may be non-recurring)

Risk Factors

  • Extremely low and declining revenue
  • Negative gross margin and operational losses
  • High volatility and speculative nature

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This watchlist spans digital media, healthcare, fintech, marketing, insurance, and clean energy, offering exposure to both growth and value themes. The portfolio balances established digital platforms (ZD, GDRX) with high-growth disruptors (EVER, QNST) and speculative plays (MNY, ADN). Sector allocation is diversified, reducing single-industry risk and enabling participation in multiple market trends.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Given current market volatility, staggered entry and dollar-cost averaging can help manage risk. Investors may consider monitoring each stock’s price action relative to its intrinsic value, using technical and fundamental signals to identify attractive entry points. For speculative names (MNY, ADN), position sizing and stop-loss strategies are prudent. Regular portfolio reviews are recommended to adjust allocations as fundamentals evolve.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screening, focusing on undervalued companies with strong fundamentals, positive free cash flow, and sector diversification, based on the latest financial data and quality ratings.

Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; EverQuote (EVER) stands out for its high quality rating, explosive revenue growth, and exceptional ROIC, but suitability depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
This collection is designed for diversification across sectors and risk profiles. Investors may consider allocating across several names to balance growth potential and risk, rather than concentrating in a single stock.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include sector-specific headwinds, negative revenue trends (notably in MNY and ADN), high debt levels (GDRX), and volatility in speculative stocks. Always review individual risk factors before making decisions.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Market timing is challenging; consider dollar-cost averaging and monitoring each stock’s price relative to its intrinsic value. Entry strategies should align with personal risk tolerance and market conditions.