7 Best Developer Tools for December 2025

7 Best Developer Tools for December 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The developer tools and software infrastructure sector has emerged as a critical investment category for growth-oriented portfolios. These companies provide essential platforms, services, and solutions that power modern software development, cloud infrastructure, and enterprise operations. Our selection criteria focus on companies demonstrating strong revenue growth, improving unit economics, and strategic positioning within the rapidly expanding software development ecosystem.

The seven stocks featured in this analysis represent a cross-section of the developer tools landscape, from established enterprise software providers to high-growth SaaS platforms. Each company has been evaluated based on ValueSense's proprietary quality ratings, intrinsic value calculations, financial health metrics, and growth trajectories. This collection offers investors exposure to companies with varying risk-return profiles, allowing for strategic portfolio construction based on individual investment objectives.

Stock #1: Atlassian Corporation (TEAM)

MetricValue
Market Cap$39.4B
Quality Rating5.6
Intrinsic Value$198.6
1Y Return-43.3%
Revenue$5,460.1M
Free Cash Flow$1,442.1M
Revenue Growth19.5%
FCF margin26.4%
Gross margin82.9%
ROIC(11.3%)
Total Debt to Equity88.9%

Investment Thesis

Atlassian Corporation stands as a market leader in team collaboration and software development tools, commanding a $39.4B market capitalization. The company demonstrates robust revenue generation of $5.46B with an impressive 82.9% gross margin, reflecting the high-margin nature of software-as-a-service businesses. With 19.5% year-over-year revenue growth and a substantial free cash flow of $1.44B, Atlassian generates significant cash returns despite operating in a competitive market.

However, the company faces notable headwinds reflected in its -43.3% one-year return and ValueSense quality rating of 5.6. The negative ROIC of -11.3% indicates challenges in capital efficiency, while the elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 88.9% suggests a leveraged balance sheet. The intrinsic value estimate of $198.6 provides a reference point for valuation analysis, though investors should carefully consider the company's current market positioning and competitive dynamics within the collaboration software space.

Key Catalysts

  • Strong free cash flow generation supporting potential shareholder returns
  • Market leadership in enterprise collaboration tools with sticky customer base
  • Continued expansion in cloud-based offerings and product ecosystem
  • Potential for margin expansion through operational efficiency initiatives

Risk Factors

  • Significant one-year underperformance indicating market skepticism
  • Negative return on invested capital suggesting capital allocation challenges
  • High leverage relative to equity base creating financial risk
  • Competitive pressures from larger cloud platforms and specialized tools

Stock #2: MongoDB, Inc. (MDB)

MetricValue
Market Cap$27.1B
Quality Rating5.8
Intrinsic Value$225.4
1Y Return3.1%
Revenue$2,218.2M
Free Cash Flow$243.7M
Revenue Growth21.9%
FCF margin11.0%
Gross margin72.3%
ROIC(26.1%)
Total Debt to Equity1.2%

Investment Thesis

MongoDB represents a compelling opportunity within the database and data platform segment, with a $27.1B market capitalization and consistent positive momentum. The company has delivered a 3.1% one-year return while maintaining strong fundamentals, including $2.22B in revenue and a 72.3% gross margin. Revenue growth of 21.9% demonstrates sustained market demand for MongoDB's NoSQL database solutions, which have become increasingly critical for modern application development.

The ValueSense quality rating of 5.8 reflects a balanced risk-return profile. While the company generates $243.7M in free cash flow with an 11.0% FCF margin, the negative ROIC of -26.1% warrants attention. This metric suggests that despite strong revenue growth and profitability, MongoDB's capital investments have not yet generated positive returns on invested capital. The intrinsic value estimate of $225.4 provides a framework for evaluating the stock's current valuation relative to fundamental value.

Key Catalysts

  • Expanding adoption of NoSQL databases across enterprise and startup ecosystems
  • Growth in cloud-native application development driving database modernization
  • Potential for margin expansion as the company scales operations
  • Strategic partnerships and integrations expanding platform value

Risk Factors

  • Negative return on invested capital indicating capital efficiency concerns
  • Competitive landscape from established database providers and open-source alternatives
  • Customer concentration risks within technology and financial services sectors
  • Execution risks in maintaining growth trajectory amid market maturation

Stock #3: JFrog Ltd. (FROG)

MetricValue
Market Cap$7,210.8M
Quality Rating6.8
Intrinsic Value$41.5
1Y Return95.8%
Revenue$502.6M
Free Cash Flow$140.9M
Revenue Growth22.7%
FCF margin28.0%
Gross margin75.7%
ROIC(19.8%)
Total Debt to Equity1.3%

Investment Thesis

JFrog has demonstrated exceptional momentum with a 95.8% one-year return, significantly outperforming the broader market and reflecting strong investor confidence. The company operates a $7.21B market capitalization with $502.6M in revenue and impressive 22.7% revenue growth. JFrog's software release management and DevOps platform has resonated strongly with enterprises seeking to accelerate software delivery cycles, positioning the company at the intersection of critical industry trends.

The ValueSense quality rating of 6.8 represents one of the strongest in this cohort, indicating superior fundamental characteristics. JFrog generates $140.9M in free cash flow with a healthy 28.0% FCF margin, demonstrating strong cash generation relative to revenue. The 75.7% gross margin reflects the premium positioning of JFrog's platform solutions. While the negative ROIC of -19.8% mirrors challenges seen in other high-growth software companies, the company's strong operational metrics and market momentum suggest improving capital efficiency as the business matures.

Key Catalysts

  • Accelerating digital transformation driving demand for DevOps and CI/CD solutions
  • Expansion into adjacent markets and vertical-specific solutions
  • Potential for operating leverage as the company scales
  • Strong customer retention and expansion within existing accounts

Risk Factors

  • Valuation premium reflecting high market expectations for future growth
  • Negative return on invested capital despite strong cash generation
  • Competitive threats from larger enterprise software vendors
  • Potential for growth deceleration as the market matures

Stock #4: GitLab Inc. (GTLB)

MetricValue
Market Cap$6,835.6M
Quality Rating5.0
Intrinsic Value$49.4
1Y Return-35.6%
Revenue$857.9M
Free Cash Flow$35.8M
Revenue Growth29.0%
FCF margin4.2%
Gross margin88.5%
ROIC(22.2%)
Total Debt to Equity0.0%

Investment Thesis

GitLab operates within the critical DevOps and software development platform category with a $6.84B market capitalization. The company has achieved impressive 29.0% revenue growth on a $857.9M revenue base, demonstrating strong market traction for its comprehensive DevOps platform. The 88.5% gross margin reflects the high-margin nature of software platforms, while the zero debt-to-equity ratio indicates a conservative balance sheet approach.

However, GitLab faces significant challenges reflected in its -35.6% one-year return and ValueSense quality rating of 5.0, the lowest in this cohort. The critical concern is the minimal free cash flow generation of $35.8M on $857.9M revenue, resulting in a 4.2% FCF margin that suggests the company is investing heavily in growth at the expense of near-term profitability. The negative ROIC of -22.2% indicates that capital investments have not yet generated positive returns. The intrinsic value estimate of $49.4 suggests potential valuation compression from current levels.

Key Catalysts

  • Continued expansion of DevOps platform adoption across enterprise segments
  • Potential for margin expansion as the company achieves greater scale
  • Opportunities in vertical-specific solutions and adjacent markets
  • Possible path to improved free cash flow generation

Risk Factors

  • Significant one-year underperformance indicating market concerns
  • Minimal free cash flow generation despite strong revenue growth
  • Negative return on invested capital suggesting inefficient capital deployment
  • Competitive pressures from established DevOps platforms and point solutions
  • Execution risk in achieving profitability while maintaining growth

Stock #5: DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN)

MetricValue
Market Cap$4,077.4M
Quality Rating6.8
Intrinsic Value$81.9
1Y Return16.9%
Revenue$864.0M
Free Cash Flow$276.5M
Revenue Growth14.2%
FCF margin32.0%
Gross margin60.6%
ROIC6.4%
Total Debt to Equity(474.7%)

Investment Thesis

DigitalOcean represents a differentiated opportunity within the cloud infrastructure segment, targeting developers and small-to-medium businesses with simplified, affordable cloud services. The company commands a $4.08B market capitalization with $864.0M in revenue and a positive 6.4% ROIC, distinguishing it as the only company in this cohort with positive return on invested capital. The 14.2% revenue growth reflects steady market demand for accessible cloud infrastructure solutions.

DigitalOcean's financial profile demonstrates strong cash generation capabilities, with $276.5M in free cash flow and an impressive 32.0% FCF margin—the highest in this collection. The 60.6% gross margin, while lower than pure software companies, reflects the infrastructure-intensive nature of cloud services. The ValueSense quality rating of 6.8 aligns with the company's balanced fundamentals. The one-year return of 16.9% indicates positive investor sentiment, while the intrinsic value estimate of $81.9 provides a valuation reference point.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of developer-focused cloud services addressing underserved market segments
  • Potential for margin expansion through operational efficiency and scale
  • Positive ROIC indicating efficient capital deployment
  • Strong free cash flow supporting potential shareholder returns and strategic investments

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressures from larger cloud providers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud)
  • Potential for margin compression in competitive pricing environment
  • Customer concentration risks within developer and startup segments
  • Execution risks in maintaining growth amid intensifying competition

Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.

Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?

Find Hidden Gems First!


Stock #6: C3.ai, Inc. (AI)

MetricValue
Market Cap$1,958.2M
Quality Rating5.6
Intrinsic Value$15.2
1Y Return-61.1%
Revenue$372.1M
Free Cash Flow($85.9M)
Revenue Growth14.3%
FCF margin(23.1%)
Gross margin56.5%
ROIC(198.2%)
Total Debt to Equity0.0%

Investment Thesis

C3.ai operates in the enterprise artificial intelligence and machine learning platform space with a $1.96B market capitalization. The company has generated $372.1M in revenue with 14.3% year-over-year growth, positioning itself within the expanding AI software market. However, C3.ai faces substantial operational challenges that warrant careful consideration by investors evaluating this position.

The company's financial metrics present significant concerns. C3.ai generated negative free cash flow of -$85.9M, resulting in a -23.1% FCF margin, indicating the company is burning cash despite revenue generation. The negative ROIC of -198.2% represents the most severe capital efficiency challenge in this cohort, suggesting substantial value destruction from capital investments. The ValueSense quality rating of 5.6 reflects these fundamental challenges. The dramatic -61.1% one-year return indicates substantial market skepticism regarding the company's business model and path to profitability. The intrinsic value estimate of $15.2 suggests significant valuation compression from current levels.

Key Catalysts

  • Potential for enterprise AI adoption acceleration driving platform demand
  • Possible path to profitability through operational restructuring
  • Strategic partnerships expanding market reach and use cases
  • Potential acquisition interest from larger enterprise software vendors

Risk Factors

  • Severe cash burn indicating unsustainable business model at current scale
  • Negative return on invested capital suggesting fundamental business model challenges
  • Significant one-year underperformance reflecting market concerns
  • Competitive threats from larger AI platforms and specialized solutions
  • Execution risk in achieving profitability and positive cash flow generation

Stock #7: Progress Software Corporation (PRGS)

MetricValue
Market Cap$1,787.9M
Quality Rating5.6
Intrinsic Value$159.4
1Y Return-39.5%
Revenue$940.1M
Free Cash Flow$186.3M
Revenue Growth31.4%
FCF margin19.8%
Gross margin81.1%
ROIC5.2%
Total Debt to Equity173.9%

Investment Thesis

Progress Software represents an established player in the enterprise software space with a $1.79B market capitalization and a diversified portfolio spanning application development, infrastructure, and business optimization solutions. The company has achieved impressive 31.4% revenue growth on a $940.1M revenue base, demonstrating strong market demand for its comprehensive software solutions. The 81.1% gross margin reflects the high-margin nature of software businesses, while the $186.3M in free cash flow with a 19.8% FCF margin indicates solid cash generation.

However, Progress Software faces headwinds reflected in its -39.5% one-year return and ValueSense quality rating of 5.6. The elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 173.9% indicates a leveraged capital structure that may constrain financial flexibility. The positive 5.2% ROIC, while modest, represents an improvement over many high-growth software companies. The intrinsic value estimate of $159.4 provides a reference point for valuation analysis, though the company's recent underperformance suggests market concerns regarding growth sustainability or capital structure.

Key Catalysts

  • Strong revenue growth indicating continued market demand for software solutions
  • Potential for margin expansion through operational efficiency and scale
  • Positive return on invested capital suggesting improving capital efficiency
  • Strategic acquisitions and product integrations expanding market reach

Risk Factors

  • Significant one-year underperformance indicating market skepticism
  • High leverage relative to equity base creating financial risk
  • Competitive pressures from specialized point solutions and larger platforms
  • Potential for growth deceleration as markets mature
  • Execution risks in managing debt levels while maintaining growth investments

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This collection of seven developer tools and software stocks offers meaningful diversification across multiple dimensions of the software infrastructure ecosystem. The portfolio spans database platforms (MongoDB), DevOps and CI/CD solutions (JFrog, GitLab), collaboration tools (Atlassian), cloud infrastructure (DigitalOcean), enterprise AI (C3.ai), and diversified enterprise software (Progress Software).

From a financial profile perspective, the stocks demonstrate varying risk-return characteristics. DigitalOcean and JFrog represent the strongest fundamental performers with positive or near-positive ROIC metrics and healthy free cash flow margins. Atlassian and Progress Software offer established market positions with significant scale, though both face capital efficiency challenges. GitLab and C3.ai represent higher-risk, higher-growth opportunities with substantial cash burn and negative capital returns, suitable only for investors with higher risk tolerance.

The portfolio exhibits a mix of market momentum profiles. JFrog's 95.8% one-year return contrasts sharply with C3.ai's -61.1% decline, offering exposure to both market darlings and potential recovery opportunities. This diversification can help balance portfolio volatility and capture opportunities across different market cycles.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Investors considering positions in this developer tools cohort should evaluate entry strategies based on individual risk tolerance and investment time horizon. For established companies like Atlassian and Progress Software, dollar-cost averaging over several months can help mitigate timing risk while building positions in quality businesses trading at discounted valuations.

High-growth companies like GitLab and C3.ai may warrant more cautious entry strategies, with investors considering smaller initial positions and scaling into larger allocations only as companies demonstrate improving unit economics and paths to profitability. The significant cash burn at these companies suggests that near-term catalysts—such as profitability announcements or strategic partnerships—could materially impact valuations.

DigitalOcean and JFrog, with their stronger financial profiles and positive momentum, may be suitable for more immediate entry, though investors should remain mindful of valuation multiples and potential mean reversion. MongoDB and Atlassian, despite their market leadership, warrant careful valuation analysis given their elevated debt levels and capital efficiency challenges.

Market conditions and interest rate environments significantly impact software valuations. In periods of rising rates, investors should prioritize companies with strong free cash flow generation and improving profitability. In lower-rate environments, growth-focused companies with path-to-profitability narratives may command premium valuations.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected for this analysis?

These seven stocks were selected based on their positioning within the developer tools and software infrastructure ecosystem. Each company was evaluated using ValueSense's proprietary quality ratings, intrinsic value calculations, financial health metrics, and growth trajectories. The selection represents a cross-section of the sector, from established market leaders to high-growth platforms, offering investors exposure to varying risk-return profiles within the developer tools space.

Q2: Which stock from this list offers the best risk-adjusted opportunity?

DigitalOcean (DOCN) and JFrog (FROG) demonstrate the strongest fundamental characteristics, with both companies achieving positive or near-positive ROIC metrics and healthy free cash flow margins. DigitalOcean offers the unique distinction of positive return on invested capital 6.4%, indicating efficient capital deployment. JFrog combines strong cash generation with exceptional one-year momentum 95.8%, though investors should remain mindful of valuation multiples. The "best" opportunity depends on individual risk tolerance and investment objectives.

Q3: Should I invest in all these stocks or focus on a subset?

Portfolio construction should reflect individual investment objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Conservative investors may prefer focusing on established companies with positive cash flow generation, such as DigitalOcean and Atlassian, despite the latter's recent underperformance. Growth-oriented investors may allocate to higher-growth, higher-risk opportunities like GitLab and C3.ai, though these require careful position sizing given their cash burn profiles. A balanced approach might involve allocating to 3-4 stocks representing different risk-return profiles.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these developer tools stocks?

The primary risks vary by company but include capital efficiency challenges (negative ROIC across most companies), competitive pressures from larger cloud platforms, and execution risks in achieving profitability. C3.ai and GitLab face particular challenges with significant cash burn and minimal free cash flow generation. Atlassian and Progress Software carry elevated debt levels that could constrain financial flexibility. All companies face competitive threats from larger enterprise software vendors and specialized point solutions.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these developer tools stocks?

Optimal entry timing depends on individual investment strategies and market conditions. Dollar-cost averaging over several months can help mitigate timing risk, particularly for volatile stocks like GitLab and C3.ai. Investors should monitor quarterly earnings reports for improvements in unit economics, free cash flow generation, and paths to profitability. Rising interest rate environments may favor companies with strong cash generation, while declining rates may support growth-focused narratives. ValueSense's backtesting tools can help evaluate historical entry points and optimal timing strategies.