10 Best Dividend Growth Stocks At 52w Low for November 2025

10 Best Dividend Growth Stocks At 52w Low for November 2025

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The current market landscape is marked by heightened volatility and sector rotation, with investors seeking resilient, fundamentally strong companies at attractive valuations. This watchlist leverages ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value tools, focusing on stocks with robust free cash flow, high quality ratings, and favorable debt profiles. Each pick is screened for sector diversity, growth potential, and risk-adjusted returns using ValueSense’s blended valuation models and backtesting features[1][2][3].

Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

MetricValue
Market Cap$48.0B
Quality Rating6.1
Intrinsic Value$509.7
1Y Return-16.9%
Revenue$7,721.0M
Free Cash Flow$2,460.1M
Revenue Growth14.0%
FCF margin31.9%
Gross margin69.0%
ROIC5.5%
Total Debt to Equity45.8%

Investment Thesis

Roper Technologies stands out for its diversified industrial technology portfolio and strong recurring revenue streams. Despite a negative 1-year return of -16.9%, the company maintains a solid market cap of $48.0B and demonstrates resilience through a 14% revenue growth rate and a high gross margin of 69.0%. The intrinsic value estimate of $509.7 suggests potential undervaluation relative to current market sentiment.

Roper’s quality rating of 6.1 reflects its stable cash generation, with $2,460.1M in free cash flow and a robust FCF margin of 31.9%. While ROIC is moderate at 5.5%, the company’s ability to maintain profitability and invest in innovation supports its long-term outlook.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion of software and network businesses
  • High recurring revenue from subscription models
  • Strong free cash flow supporting acquisitions and growth

Risk Factors

  • Elevated debt-to-equity ratio 45.8% may limit financial flexibility
  • Sensitivity to industrial sector cycles
  • Slower ROIC compared to sector peers

Paychex, Inc. (PAYX)

MetricValue
Market Cap$42.1B
Quality Rating6.9
Intrinsic Value$56.4
1Y Return-14.9%
Revenue$5,793.2M
Free Cash Flow$1,922.7M
Revenue Growth9.1%
FCF margin33.2%
Gross margin72.8%
ROIC19.1%
Total Debt to Equity1.8%

Investment Thesis

Paychex is a leader in payroll and HR solutions for small and mid-sized businesses, boasting a $42.1B market cap and a strong quality rating of 6.9. The company’s intrinsic value of $56.4, paired with a 1-year return of -14.9%, highlights a potential opportunity for value-oriented investors. Paychex’s 9.1% revenue growth and exceptional gross margin of 72.8% underscore its operational efficiency.

With $1,922.7M in free cash flow and a best-in-class FCF margin of 33.2%, Paychex demonstrates superior capital allocation. Its ROIC of 19.1% and minimal debt-to-equity ratio 1.8% further reinforce its financial health and ability to weather economic downturns.

Key Catalysts

  • Continued growth in HR outsourcing and SaaS solutions
  • Expansion into new verticals and geographies
  • Strong cash flow enabling dividend growth and buybacks

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressures from fintech disruptors
  • Economic sensitivity impacting SMB client base
  • Regulatory changes in payroll and benefits

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

MetricValue
Market Cap$23.1B
Quality Rating6.3
Intrinsic Value$84.4
1Y Return-42.9%
Revenue$9,623.5M
Free Cash Flow$1,848.1M
Revenue Growth(5.6%)
FCF margin19.2%
Gross margin51.7%
ROIC17.0%
Total Debt to Equity129.0%

Investment Thesis

Constellation Brands, a major player in beverages, faces headwinds with a -42.9% 1-year return and a $23.1B market cap. However, its intrinsic value of $84.4 and quality rating of 6.3 suggest underlying strengths. The company’s $9,623.5M in revenue and $1,848.1M in free cash flow highlight its scale, though recent revenue growth has declined -5.6%.

Constellation’s gross margin of 51.7% and ROIC of 17.0% indicate efficient operations and capital use. The high debt-to-equity ratio 129.0% is a concern, but the company’s established brands and distribution network provide a buffer against market volatility.

Key Catalysts

  • Portfolio diversification into premium and craft beverages
  • International expansion, especially in emerging markets
  • Cost optimization initiatives

Risk Factors

  • High leverage increases financial risk
  • Shifting consumer preferences
  • Regulatory risks in alcohol markets

Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz (KSPI)

MetricValue
Market Cap$14.3B
Quality Rating6.2
Intrinsic Value$460.2
1Y Return-31.0%
RevenueKZT 3,162.6B
Free Cash FlowKZT 665.5B
Revenue Growth43.0%
FCF margin21.0%
Gross margin62.5%
ROIC227.5%
Total Debt to Equity29.1%

Investment Thesis

Kaspi.kz is a fintech leader in Kazakhstan, with a $14.3B market cap and a quality rating of 6.2. The company’s intrinsic value of $460.2 and impressive revenue growth of 43.0% position it as a high-growth contender. Despite a -31.0% 1-year return, Kaspi.kz’s gross margin of 62.5% and extraordinary ROIC of 227.5% reflect its dominant market position and efficient capital deployment.

Kaspi.kz’s free cash flow (KZT 665.5B) and FCF margin of 21.0% support ongoing innovation and expansion. The relatively low debt-to-equity ratio 29.1% adds to its financial stability.

Key Catalysts

  • Rapid fintech adoption in Central Asia
  • Expansion of digital banking and payment platforms
  • Strong user growth and ecosystem effects

Risk Factors

  • Currency and geopolitical risks
  • Regulatory changes in financial services
  • Market concentration risk

Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL)

MetricValue
Market Cap$11.9B
Quality Rating5.1
Intrinsic Value$30.4
1Y Return-28.7%
Revenue$12.1B
Free Cash Flow$627.7M
Revenue Growth0.6%
FCF margin5.2%
Gross margin16.3%
ROIC7.5%
Total Debt to Equity35.3%

Investment Thesis

Hormel Foods, a staple in the consumer staples sector, has a $11.9B market cap and a quality rating of 5.1. Its intrinsic value of $30.4 and flat revenue growth 0.6% point to stability rather than aggressive expansion. The company’s gross margin of 16.3% and ROIC of 7.5% are modest, but its low debt-to-equity ratio 35.3% and consistent free cash flow $627.7M provide a solid foundation.

Hormel’s FCF margin of 5.2% and -28.7% 1-year return suggest limited upside, but its defensive characteristics and brand strength make it a reliable portfolio anchor.

Key Catalysts

  • Expansion into health-focused and premium food products
  • Operational efficiency improvements
  • Stable demand for packaged foods

Risk Factors

  • Margin pressure from input costs
  • Slow growth in mature markets
  • Competitive threats from private labels

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH)

MetricValue
Market Cap$10.7B
Quality Rating6.2
Intrinsic Value$156.2
1Y Return-51.6%
Revenue$11.7B
Free Cash Flow$819.0M
Revenue Growth2.4%
FCF margin7.0%
Gross margin53.5%
ROIC20.4%
Total Debt to Equity32.6%

Investment Thesis

Booz Allen Hamilton, a leader in government consulting, has a $10.7B market cap and a quality rating of 6.2. Its intrinsic value of $156.2 and 1-year return of -51.6% reflect market challenges, but the company’s $11.7B revenue and $819.0M free cash flow highlight its scale. Booz Allen’s gross margin of 53.5% and ROIC of 20.4% indicate strong operational efficiency.

The debt-to-equity ratio 32.6% is manageable, and the company’s FCF margin of 7.0% supports ongoing investment in technology and talent.

Key Catalysts

  • Increased government spending on cybersecurity and digital transformation
  • Expansion into commercial consulting
  • Strong contract backlog

Risk Factors

  • Dependence on government contracts
  • Budgetary constraints and political risk
  • Talent retention challenges

Pool Corporation (POOL)

MetricValue
Market Cap$9,953.9M
Quality Rating5.3
Intrinsic Value$264.1
1Y Return-25.9%
Revenue$5,294.7M
Free Cash Flow$394.7M
Revenue Growth(0.6%)
FCF margin7.5%
Gross margin29.6%
ROIC16.9%
Total Debt to Equity24.7%

Investment Thesis

Pool Corporation, a distributor of swimming pool supplies, has a $9,953.9M market cap and a quality rating of 5.3. Its intrinsic value of $264.1 and -25.9% 1-year return reflect recent sector weakness. The company’s $5,294.7M revenue and $394.7M free cash flow are supported by a 7.5% FCF margin and a solid gross margin of 29.6%.

Pool’s ROIC of 16.9% and low debt-to-equity ratio 24.7% indicate prudent financial management. While revenue growth is slightly negative -0.6%, the company’s market leadership and operational scale remain strengths.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in residential construction and renovation
  • Expansion into new product categories
  • Operational efficiency initiatives

Risk Factors

  • Cyclical demand tied to housing market
  • Weather-related sales volatility
  • Competitive pressures

KBR, Inc. (KBR)

MetricValue
Market Cap$5,483.5M
Quality Rating6.4
Intrinsic Value$65.5
1Y Return-35.9%
Revenue$8,060.0M
Free Cash Flow$499.0M
Revenue Growth9.7%
FCF margin6.2%
Gross margin14.3%
ROIC13.2%
Total Debt to Equity193.9%

Investment Thesis

KBR, a global engineering and construction firm, has a $5,483.5M market cap and a quality rating of 6.4. Its intrinsic value of $65.5 and -35.9% 1-year return highlight sector challenges. The company’s $8,060.0M revenue and $499.0M free cash flow are supported by a 6.2% FCF margin and a gross margin of 14.3%.

KBR’s ROIC of 13.2% and high debt-to-equity ratio 193.9% warrant caution, but its diversified project portfolio and exposure to government contracts provide stability.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in defense and government services
  • Expansion into energy transition projects
  • Strategic acquisitions

Risk Factors

  • High leverage increases financial risk
  • Project execution and cost overruns
  • Cyclical demand in construction

Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK)

MetricValue
Market Cap$4,824.2M
Quality Rating5.1
Intrinsic Value$31.2
1Y Return-43.2%
Revenue$8,635.0M
Free Cash Flow($167.0M)
Revenue Growth(5.0%)
FCF margin(1.9%)
Gross margin21.1%
ROIC7.5%
Total Debt to Equity181.3%

Investment Thesis

Graphic Packaging, a leader in packaging solutions, has a $4,824.2M market cap and a quality rating of 5.1. Its intrinsic value of $31.2 and -43.2% 1-year return reflect sector headwinds. The company’s $8,635.0M revenue is offset by negative free cash flow -$167.0M and a FCF margin of -1.9%, indicating operational challenges.

Graphic Packaging’s gross margin of 21.1% and ROIC of 7.5% are modest, while its high debt-to-equity ratio 181.3% raises concerns about financial flexibility.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in sustainable packaging demand
  • Expansion into new markets
  • Cost reduction initiatives

Risk Factors

  • High leverage and negative free cash flow
  • Margin pressure from input costs
  • Competitive threats

WPP plc (WPP)

MetricValue
Market Cap$4,086.1M
Quality Rating5.5
Intrinsic Value$111.7
1Y Return-63.9%
Revenue£29.0B
Free Cash Flow£1,726.8M
Revenue Growth2.5%
FCF margin5.9%
Gross margin16.3%
ROIC17.2%
Total Debt to Equity198.2%

Investment Thesis

WPP, a global advertising and communications firm, has a $4,086.1M market cap and a quality rating of 5.5. Its intrinsic value of $111.7 and -63.9% 1-year return reflect significant market challenges. The company’s £29.0B revenue and £1,726.8M free cash flow support a 5.9% FCF margin and a gross margin of 16.3%.

WPP’s ROIC of 17.2% is strong, but its high debt-to-equity ratio 198.2% and exposure to cyclical advertising demand present risks.

Key Catalysts

  • Growth in digital and data-driven marketing
  • Expansion into emerging markets
  • Strategic restructuring and cost optimization

Risk Factors

  • High leverage and sector cyclicality
  • Disruption from digital platforms
  • Margin pressure

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This watchlist spans industrial technology, fintech, consumer staples, consulting, packaging, and advertising, providing broad sector allocation. The inclusion of both defensive (Hormel Foods, Paychex) and growth-oriented (Kaspi.kz, Roper Technologies) stocks helps balance risk and return. Exposure to international markets (Kaspi.kz, WPP) and cyclical sectors (Pool Corporation, KBR) further enhances diversification, reducing portfolio concentration risk.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Given recent market corrections, many featured stocks are trading near 52-week lows, presenting potential entry points for long-term investors. ValueSense’s intrinsic value estimates and quality ratings can guide timing decisions, while backtesting features allow users to simulate historical performance before committing capital[1][2]. Consider dollar-cost averaging or staggered entries to mitigate volatility and optimize risk-adjusted returns.


Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!



FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screening tools, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, free cash flow, and sector diversification for balanced risk and opportunity[1][2][3].

Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
No single “best” stock exists; each offers unique strengths. Paychex and Kaspi.kz stand out for high quality ratings and growth, while Roper Technologies and Constellation Brands provide sector resilience.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is key. This watchlist is designed to spread risk across sectors and geographies, reducing exposure to any single company or industry.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Major risks include high leverage (Constellation Brands, KBR, WPP), sector cyclicality (Pool Corporation, KBR), and regulatory or geopolitical factors (Kaspi.kz, Booz Allen Hamilton).

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Many are near 52-week lows, which may offer attractive entry points. Use ValueSense’s intrinsic value and backtesting tools to assess timing and simulate historical performance before investing[1][2].