7 Best Food Delivery for November 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The 2025 equity landscape is shaped by rapid technological innovation, evolving consumer habits, and a renewed focus on operational efficiency. Our stock picks leverage ValueSense’s proprietary intrinsic value models, blending discounted cash flow and peer-relative analysis to identify companies trading below their fair value[1]. We prioritize stocks with strong free cash flow, robust revenue growth, and healthy margins, while also considering quality ratings and sector diversification. Each selection is supported by comprehensive financial metrics and qualitative insights, ensuring a balanced, data-driven watchlist[2].
Featured Stock Analysis
Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $201.9B |
| Quality Rating | 7.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $201.7 |
| 1Y Return | 33.9% |
| Revenue | $47.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $8,540.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 18.2% |
| FCF margin | 18.0% |
| Gross margin | 39.7% |
| ROIC | 66.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 52.2% |
Investment Thesis
Uber Technologies stands out as a global leader in ride-hailing and mobility services, with a market cap of $201.9B. The company’s robust revenue base of $47.3B and a 1-year return of 33.9% underscore its resilience and growth potential. Uber’s intrinsic value of $201.7, closely matching its current market valuation, signals a well-priced asset with further upside as it leverages network effects and expands into adjacent markets. Its free cash flow of $8.54B and an impressive FCF margin of 18% highlight operational efficiency. Uber’s ROIC of 66.4% is a testament to superior capital allocation, outpacing many industry peers.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of delivery and logistics segments
- Continued adoption of mobility-as-a-service platforms
- Strong free cash flow generation supporting reinvestment
- Global brand recognition and scale advantages
Risk Factors
- Regulatory pressures in key markets
- Competitive threats from regional players and new entrants
- Exposure to macroeconomic cycles impacting discretionary travel
DoorDash, Inc. (DASH)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $108.1B |
| Quality Rating | 7.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $141.4 |
| 1Y Return | 62.3% |
| Revenue | $11.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,713.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 23.8% |
| FCF margin | 14.4% |
| Gross margin | 50.0% |
| ROIC | 9.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 36.4% |
Investment Thesis
DoorDash, with a $108.1B market cap, has cemented its position as a dominant force in food delivery and logistics. The company’s 1-year return of 62.3% reflects strong investor confidence, while revenue growth of 23.8% and a gross margin of 50% indicate a scalable, profitable business model. DoorDash’s intrinsic value of $141.4 suggests room for appreciation, especially as it diversifies into new verticals and geographies. The company’s FCF margin of 14.4% and a quality rating of 7.3 reinforce its operational strength.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion into grocery and convenience delivery
- Strategic partnerships with retailers and restaurants
- Technology-driven logistics optimization
- Increasing consumer adoption of on-demand services
Risk Factors
- Intensifying competition in last-mile delivery
- Margin pressures from promotional activity and cost inflation
- Regulatory changes affecting gig economy models
Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.5B |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $6.7 |
| 1Y Return | 47.3% |
| Revenue | $3,072.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $671.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 18.8% |
| FCF margin | 21.8% |
| Gross margin | 42.9% |
| ROIC | (6.6%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 30.1% |
Investment Thesis
Grab Holdings, valued at $24.5B, is Southeast Asia’s super-app leader, integrating ride-hailing, food delivery, and digital payments. With a 1-year return of 47.3% and revenue growth of 18.8%, Grab is capitalizing on the region’s digital transformation. Its intrinsic value of $6.7 and a free cash flow margin of 21.8% highlight a path to sustainable profitability. The company’s gross margin of 42.9% and a quality rating of 6.1 reflect a solid, though still maturing, business model.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of financial services and digital wallet adoption
- Growth in mobility and delivery segments across Southeast Asia
- Strategic partnerships with local governments and enterprises
Risk Factors
- High competition from local and international super-apps
- Currency and regulatory risks in emerging markets
- Negative ROIC -6.6% indicating ongoing investment phase
Instacart (Maplebear Inc.) (CART)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,679.0M |
| Quality Rating | 7.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $61.9 |
| 1Y Return | -16.4% |
| Revenue | $3,546.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $779.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 10.5% |
| FCF margin | 22.0% |
| Gross margin | 74.8% |
| ROIC | 26.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 2.0% |
Investment Thesis
Instacart, trading under Maplebear Inc. with a $9.68B market cap, is a key player in North American online grocery delivery. Despite a negative 1-year return of -16.4%, the company boasts a high gross margin of 74.8% and a strong FCF margin of 22%. Its intrinsic value of $61.9 suggests potential undervaluation. Instacart’s revenue growth of 10.5% and a quality rating of 7.3 indicate a resilient business model, well-positioned for long-term e-commerce trends.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of retail partnerships and white-label solutions
- Growth in online grocery adoption post-pandemic
- High operational leverage from technology infrastructure
Risk Factors
- Competitive pressures from large retailers and tech giants
- Slower-than-expected growth in online grocery penetration
- Market volatility impacting valuation multiples
PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,110.9M |
| Quality Rating | 5.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $54.5 |
| 1Y Return | 16.4% |
| Revenue | $351.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | $38.6M |
| Revenue Growth | 8.9% |
| FCF margin | 11.0% |
| Gross margin | 67.9% |
| ROIC | (8.4%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | (449.1%) |
Investment Thesis
PROS Holdings, with a $1.11B market cap, specializes in AI-powered revenue management and pricing solutions. The company’s 1-year return of 16.4% and a gross margin of 67.9% underscore its niche leadership. An intrinsic value of $54.5 and a quality rating of 5.6 suggest moderate upside, particularly as enterprises digitize pricing strategies. However, negative ROIC -8.4% and high debt levels warrant caution.
Key Catalysts
- Rising adoption of AI-driven pricing in travel and e-commerce
- Expansion into new verticals and international markets
- Recurring revenue from SaaS contracts
Risk Factors
- High leverage (Total Debt to Equity: -449.1%)
- Slower enterprise IT spending cycles
- Competitive threats from larger software vendors
Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $398.2M |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $8.0 |
| 1Y Return | -54.0% |
| Revenue | CN¥23.9B |
| Free Cash Flow | CN¥677.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 15.1% |
| FCF margin | 2.8% |
| Gross margin | 29.7% |
| ROIC | 37.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 236.2% |
Investment Thesis
Dingdong, with a $398.2M market cap, is a leading fresh grocery e-commerce platform in China. Despite a challenging year (-54% 1Y return), the company’s revenue of CN¥23.9B and a quality rating of 6.4 highlight its scale and potential. Dingdong’s intrinsic value of $8.0 and a positive ROIC of 37.9% suggest operational improvements, though high debt (236.2% D/E) and margin pressures remain concerns.
Key Catalysts
- Growth in China’s online grocery market
- Expansion of private label and fresh food offerings
- Operational efficiencies driving margin recovery
Risk Factors
- High leverage and funding risks
- Intense competition from larger e-commerce players
- Volatile consumer demand and regulatory shifts
WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $111.0M |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $10.7 |
| 1Y Return | 35.5% |
| Revenue | $183.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | $15.1M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.4% |
| FCF margin | 8.2% |
| Gross margin | 95.1% |
| ROIC | 12.4% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 41.4% |
Investment Thesis
WM Technology, with a $111M market cap, operates a leading marketplace and SaaS platform for the cannabis industry. The company’s 1-year return of 35.5% and a gross margin of 95.1% are notable strengths. An intrinsic value of $10.7 and a quality rating of 6.0 point to potential undervaluation. WM Technology’s FCF margin of 8.2% and ROIC of 12.4% reflect a scalable, asset-light business model.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of legal cannabis markets in North America
- Growth in SaaS adoption among dispensaries
- Regulatory tailwinds supporting industry formalization
Risk Factors
- Regulatory uncertainty and evolving compliance requirements
- Fragmented and competitive industry landscape
- Limited access to traditional financing
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This watchlist spans multiple sectors—mobility (UBER, GRAB), food delivery (DASH, CART, DDL), enterprise software (PRO), and cannabis technology (MAPS)—providing exposure to both established and emerging growth themes. The mix of large-cap leaders and niche innovators helps balance risk and return, while geographic diversity (North America, Southeast Asia, China) reduces region-specific volatility. Investors can use this diversified approach to mitigate sector-specific downturns and capitalize on global trends.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Given the dynamic nature of these industries, timing entries based on earnings cycles, macroeconomic indicators, and sector momentum is crucial. ValueSense’s intrinsic value tools and earnings sentiment analysis can help identify periods of undervaluation or positive management outlooks[1][2]. Consider dollar-cost averaging for volatile names and monitor key catalysts—such as regulatory changes or new product launches—for optimal entry points.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
Stocks were chosen using ValueSense’s proprietary screening tools, focusing on intrinsic value, quality ratings, growth metrics, and sector diversification[1][2].
Q2: What’s the best stock from this list?
Each stock offers unique strengths; Uber and DoorDash stand out for scale and growth, while Instacart and WM Technology present niche opportunities. The “best” depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversification is key. This watchlist is designed to provide sector and geographic balance, reducing risk compared to concentrated bets.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Risks include regulatory changes, competitive pressures, high leverage (notably in Dingdong and PROS Holdings), and sector volatility. Always review individual risk factors before investing.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing often aligns with periods of undervaluation, positive earnings sentiment, or major industry catalysts. ValueSense’s tools can help identify these windows for each stock[1][2].