7 Best 3d Printing for January 2026
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The advanced manufacturing and design technology sector presents compelling opportunities for value-focused investors in 2026. This collection of stocks spans digital design platforms, 3D printing technologies, and manufacturing automation solutions—industries experiencing structural growth driven by digital transformation, supply chain optimization, and additive manufacturing adoption.
Our selection methodology prioritizes companies with strong intrinsic value metrics, sustainable revenue growth, and meaningful free cash flow generation. We've analyzed each company's Quality Rating (ValueSense's proprietary assessment of financial health), compared current valuations against intrinsic value calculations, and evaluated sector-specific catalysts. This watchlist balances established market leaders with emerging growth opportunities, offering diversified exposure across market capitalizations and risk profiles.
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $60.9B |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $190.5 |
| 1Y Return | -2.2% |
| Revenue | $6,882.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,115.0M |
| Revenue Growth | 15.5% |
| FCF margin | 30.7% |
| Gross margin | 91.3% |
| ROIC | 21.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 101.2% |
Investment Thesis
Autodesk represents the quality anchor of this portfolio, commanding a $60.9B market capitalization with a 7.0 Quality Rating—the highest in this collection. The company demonstrates exceptional operational efficiency with a 91.3% gross margin and generates substantial free cash flow of $2,115.0M annually, translating to a 30.7% FCF margin. With 15.5% revenue growth and a 21.3% ROIC, Autodesk exhibits the financial characteristics of a mature, profitable software business scaling effectively.
The company's intrinsic value of $190.5 suggests current market pricing reflects fair value, making ADSK suitable for investors seeking quality exposure to the design software ecosystem. Despite a modest -2.2% one-year return, the company's fundamental strength and market position provide stability within a growth-oriented portfolio. Autodesk's dominant position in CAD, BIM, and creative software markets positions it to benefit from accelerating digital transformation across architecture, engineering, construction, and media industries.
Key Catalysts
- Continued cloud migration and subscription model expansion
- AI-powered design assistance features driving user engagement
- International market penetration in emerging economies
- Strategic M&A opportunities in complementary software segments
- Enterprise customer expansion and seat growth
Risk Factors
- High debt-to-equity ratio of 101.2% requires monitoring
- Competitive pressure from open-source and specialized design tools
- Economic sensitivity of construction and media spending
- Customer concentration risk in enterprise segments
- Subscription model dependency on retention rates
Stock #2: Xometry, Inc. (XMTR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3,155.5M |
| Quality Rating | 5.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $47.6 |
| 1Y Return | 50.8% |
| Revenue | $642.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($13.7M) |
| Revenue Growth | 22.4% |
| FCF margin | (2.1%) |
| Gross margin | 39.3% |
| ROIC | (11.2%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 122.1% |
Investment Thesis
Xometry exemplifies a high-growth manufacturing technology platform experiencing rapid market adoption. The company achieved an impressive 50.8% one-year return, reflecting strong investor confidence in its business model. With 22.4% revenue growth and a $3,155.5M market cap, Xometry operates a digital marketplace connecting manufacturers with customers seeking custom parts and components.
The 5.6 Quality Rating reflects the company's growth-stage profile, with current challenges in profitability offset by substantial revenue expansion. An intrinsic value of $47.6 suggests potential valuation support at current levels. Xometry's platform economics—leveraging AI and automation to optimize manufacturing workflows—position it to capture significant market share in the fragmented custom manufacturing sector. The company's 39.3% gross margin demonstrates the value creation potential of its technology-enabled model.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of manufacturing partner network and geographic coverage
- AI-driven quoting and production optimization improvements
- Enterprise customer acquisition and wallet share growth
- International marketplace expansion beyond North America
- Potential profitability inflection as platform scales
Risk Factors
- Negative free cash flow of $13.7M and -2.1% FCF margin indicate cash burn
- Negative -11.2% ROIC reflects current unprofitability
- High debt-to-equity ratio of 122.1% limits financial flexibility
- Competitive threats from established manufacturing networks
- Customer concentration risk in early-stage platform development
- Economic sensitivity to manufacturing spending cycles
Stock #3: Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,208.3M |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $43.6 |
| 1Y Return | 32.5% |
| Revenue | $518.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | $75.8M |
| Revenue Growth | 2.8% |
| FCF margin | 14.6% |
| Gross margin | 44.1% |
| ROIC | 1.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.5% |
Investment Thesis
Proto Labs operates a profitable digital manufacturing platform with a balanced growth and profitability profile. The company generated $75.8M in free cash flow with a 14.6% FCF margin, demonstrating sustainable cash generation despite modest 2.8% revenue growth. A 6.2 Quality Rating reflects solid financial health, while the $1,208.3M market cap positions PRLB as a mid-cap player in the digital manufacturing space.
The 32.5% one-year return indicates market recognition of the company's value proposition. With an intrinsic value of $43.6 and a 0.5% debt-to-equity ratio, Proto Labs maintains a fortress balance sheet enabling strategic flexibility. The company's 44.1% gross margin and 1.5% ROIC reflect a mature, capital-efficient business model. Proto Labs' established customer base and proven operational execution provide downside protection while the company explores growth initiatives in new markets and services.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of on-demand manufacturing capabilities and service offerings
- International market development and capacity additions
- Digital platform enhancements improving customer experience
- Potential M&A to accelerate growth in adjacent markets
- Operating leverage from fixed cost base as volumes recover
Risk Factors
- Modest revenue growth of 2.8% suggests market maturity
- Low 1.5% ROIC indicates limited incremental capital efficiency
- Competitive intensity from larger contract manufacturers
- Customer concentration in specific industries (aerospace, automotive)
- Sensitivity to manufacturing cycle downturns
- Technology disruption from alternative manufacturing methods
Stock #4: Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $751.9M |
| Quality Rating | 4.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $17.6 |
| 1Y Return | 3.6% |
| Revenue | $561.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($3,166.0K) |
| Revenue Growth | (2.9%) |
| FCF margin | (0.6%) |
| Gross margin | 43.9% |
| ROIC | (9.0%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 3.6% |
Investment Thesis
Stratasys represents a turnaround opportunity in the 3D printing sector, with a 4.5 Quality Rating reflecting current operational challenges. The company's $751.9M market cap and intrinsic value of $17.6 suggest potential value for contrarian investors. Despite negative free cash flow of $3,166.0K and a -0.6% FCF margin, Stratasys maintains a 43.9% gross margin, indicating underlying product strength.
The 3.6% one-year return reflects market skepticism, while -2.9% revenue decline signals near-term headwinds. However, the 3D printing sector's long-term growth trajectory and Stratasys' technology portfolio in polymer and metal additive manufacturing present potential recovery scenarios. The company's low 3.6% debt-to-equity ratio provides financial flexibility for restructuring initiatives. Investors should view SSYS as a speculative position dependent on successful operational turnaround and market recovery.
Key Catalysts
- Successful execution of cost restructuring and operational efficiency programs
- New product launches in high-margin polymer and metal printing segments
- Market recovery in aerospace, automotive, and healthcare applications
- Strategic partnerships or licensing of proprietary technology
- Potential acquisition by larger industrial conglomerate
Risk Factors
- Negative free cash flow and -9.0% ROIC indicate value destruction
- Revenue decline of -2.9% suggests market share loss or demand weakness
- Intense competition from Formlabs, 3D Systems, and international competitors
- Technology obsolescence risk in rapidly evolving additive manufacturing
- Customer concentration in cyclical industries
- Execution risk on turnaround initiatives
- Potential for further valuation deterioration if recovery stalls
Stock #5: Materialise NV (MTLS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $324.9M |
| Quality Rating | 5.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $14.2 |
| 1Y Return | -23.1% |
| Revenue | $274.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1,998.0K |
| Revenue Growth | 3.5% |
| FCF margin | 0.7% |
| Gross margin | 56.5% |
| ROIC | 1.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
Materialise operates a diversified 3D printing software and services platform with a 5.0 Quality Rating and $324.9M market cap. The company's 56.5% gross margin reflects the value of its software and IP licensing business, while 3.5% revenue growth indicates steady market demand. With minimal debt (0.0% debt-to-equity), Materialise maintains financial flexibility for strategic investments.
The company generated $1,998.0K in free cash flow with a 0.7% FCF margin, demonstrating modest but positive cash generation. An intrinsic value of $14.2 and -23.1% one-year return suggest the market has repriced the stock downward, potentially creating value for patient investors. Materialise's software platform (Magics, Mimics) serves the medical, dental, and industrial 3D printing markets, providing recurring revenue streams and high-margin opportunities. The company's diversified business model reduces dependence on hardware cycles.
Key Catalysts
- Expansion of medical and dental software adoption globally
- Growth in 3D printing services for orthopedic and dental applications
- Strategic partnerships with medical device manufacturers
- International market penetration in Asia and Europe
- Potential acquisition by larger medical technology or software companies
Risk Factors
- Minimal free cash flow generation limits growth investment capacity
- Low 1.6% ROIC indicates capital inefficiency
- Modest revenue growth of 3.5% suggests limited organic expansion
- Dependence on 3D printing market adoption rates
- Customer concentration in medical and dental segments
- Competitive pressure from larger software and services providers
- Currency exposure to European operations
Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.
Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?
Find Hidden Gems First!
Stock #6: 3D Systems Corporation (DDD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $229.9M |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $12.3 |
| 1Y Return | -42.2% |
| Revenue | $391.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($94.2M) |
| Revenue Growth | (11.8%) |
| FCF margin | (24.1%) |
| Gross margin | 33.9% |
| ROIC | (34.0%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 26.5% |
Investment Thesis
3D Systems represents the most challenged investment in this portfolio, with a 5.7 Quality Rating and significant operational headwinds. The company's -42.2% one-year return and -11.8% revenue decline reflect severe market challenges. Negative free cash flow of $94.2M with a -24.1% FCF margin indicates substantial cash burn, while a -34.0% ROIC demonstrates value destruction.
An intrinsic value of $12.3 against a $229.9M market cap suggests the market has heavily discounted the company's prospects. The 33.9% gross margin provides some operational foundation, but the company's inability to generate positive cash flow raises sustainability concerns. 3D Systems' diversified portfolio spanning hardware, software, and services has not translated into competitive advantage. This position should be considered highly speculative, suitable only for investors with high risk tolerance and conviction in a turnaround scenario.
Key Catalysts
- Successful execution of restructuring and cost reduction initiatives
- New product launches in high-growth market segments
- Strategic partnerships or joint ventures to expand market reach
- Potential acquisition or merger with complementary technology company
- Market recovery in aerospace and automotive applications
Risk Factors
- Severe negative cash flow and -34.0% ROIC indicate critical challenges
- Declining revenue of -11.8% suggests market share loss
- High debt-to-equity ratio of 26.5% limits financial flexibility
- Intense competition from better-capitalized competitors
- Technology disruption and product obsolescence risk
- Customer concentration in cyclical industries
- Potential for bankruptcy or significant equity dilution
- Execution risk on turnaround initiatives
Stock #7: Boxlight Corporation (BOXL)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,025.7K |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $987.3 |
| 1Y Return | -13.5% |
| Revenue | $106.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($384.0K) |
| Revenue Growth | (29.3%) |
| FCF margin | (0.4%) |
| Gross margin | 32.6% |
| ROIC | (33.5%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 491.7% |
Investment Thesis
Boxlight represents an extreme micro-cap opportunity with a $1,025.7K market cap and 5.7 Quality Rating. The company's -13.5% one-year return and -29.3% revenue decline reflect severe operational challenges in the educational technology market. Negative free cash flow of $384.0K and a -0.4% FCF margin indicate cash burn, while a -33.5% ROIC demonstrates value destruction.
An intrinsic value of $987.3 appears disconnected from market reality, suggesting potential data anomalies or extreme valuation assumptions. The company's 32.6% gross margin provides minimal operational foundation given the revenue collapse. Most concerning is the 491.7% debt-to-equity ratio, indicating severe financial distress and potential solvency concerns. Boxlight should be considered a distressed situation suitable only for specialized investors with expertise in turnarounds or restructurings.
Key Catalysts
- Successful restructuring and debt refinancing
- Recovery in educational technology spending post-pandemic
- New product launches addressing remote and hybrid learning
- Strategic partnerships with larger educational technology providers
- Potential acquisition by larger competitor or private equity firm
Risk Factors
- Severe revenue decline of -29.3% indicates market rejection
- Negative free cash flow and -33.5% ROIC signal critical distress
- Extremely high debt-to-equity ratio of 491.7% creates solvency risk
- Minimal market capitalization limits liquidity and analyst coverage
- Intense competition from established educational technology providers
- Secular decline in demand for interactive classroom displays
- Potential bankruptcy or significant equity dilution
- Limited financial flexibility for strategic initiatives
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This seven-stock collection spans multiple dimensions of the advanced manufacturing and design technology ecosystem, offering diversified exposure across market capitalizations, profitability profiles, and growth trajectories.
Sector and Market Cap Allocation:
The portfolio balances a large-cap quality anchor (Autodesk at $60.9B) with mid-cap operational businesses (Proto Labs at $1.2B, Xometry at $3.2B) and smaller-cap turnaround opportunities (3D Systems, Stratasys, Materialise, Boxlight). This structure provides stability from established market leaders while capturing upside from emerging growth platforms and potential recovery situations.
Profitability and Cash Flow Spectrum:
Autodesk and Proto Labs represent the profitable core, generating substantial free cash flow and positive returns on invested capital. Xometry and Materialise occupy the growth-stage middle ground, with positive gross margins but negative or minimal free cash flow. Stratasys, 3D Systems, and Boxlight represent turnaround or distressed situations requiring operational recovery for value realization.
Growth and Valuation Positioning:
High-growth positions (Xometry at 22.4% revenue growth, Autodesk at 15.5%) balance against mature, stable businesses (Proto Labs at 2.8% growth). This mix allows investors to capture secular growth trends in digital manufacturing while maintaining exposure to established, cash-generative businesses. Valuation spreads suggest the market has priced in significant skepticism toward 3D printing and educational technology, creating potential asymmetric opportunities for contrarian investors.
Risk Concentration Considerations:
The portfolio exhibits meaningful concentration in 3D printing and additive manufacturing technologies (Stratasys, 3D Systems, Materialise, Boxlight), which share common market cycle and technology disruption risks. Investors should size positions accordingly and consider this sector concentration when evaluating overall portfolio risk. Autodesk and Proto Labs provide diversification into adjacent but distinct markets (design software and contract manufacturing).
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Valuation-Based Entry Points:
ValueSense's intrinsic value calculations provide quantitative entry frameworks for each position. Autodesk at $190.5 intrinsic value suggests fair value at current levels, suitable for dollar-cost averaging. Xometry ($47.6 intrinsic value) and Proto Labs ($43.6 intrinsic value) offer entry points for growth-oriented investors. Stratasys $17.6, Materialise $14.2, and 3D Systems $12.3 represent deep value opportunities for contrarian investors, though with elevated execution risk.
Sector Cycle Positioning:
The advanced manufacturing sector exhibits cyclicality tied to capital spending, industrial production, and technology adoption curves. Current market conditions suggest early-cycle positioning in 3D printing adoption, with potential for multi-year growth as applications expand beyond prototyping into production manufacturing. Educational technology (Boxlight) faces secular headwinds from pandemic normalization, suggesting patience or avoidance for most investors.
Accumulation Strategies:
For quality positions (Autodesk, Proto Labs), consider systematic accumulation through dollar-cost averaging to reduce timing risk. For growth positions (Xometry), establish initial positions at intrinsic value levels with plans to add on weakness. For turnaround situations (Stratasys, 3D Systems, Materialise), consider waiting for operational inflection signals (positive free cash flow, revenue stabilization) before initiating positions.
Risk Management Considerations:
Position sizing should reflect conviction and risk tolerance. Autodesk and Proto Labs warrant larger allocations given quality and profitability. Xometry merits moderate sizing given growth potential offset by profitability challenges. Turnaround situations (Stratasys, 3D Systems, Boxlight) should represent small, speculative allocations with defined exit criteria. Establish stop-loss levels for positions showing deteriorating fundamentals or failed turnaround execution.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- Nelson Peltz - Trian Fund Management Portfolio Q3'2025: Top Holdings & Recent Changes
- Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order by Ray Dalio
- The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson
- Principles for Navigating Big Debt Crises by Ray Dalio
- Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini Ph.D.
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected for this watchlist?
These seven stocks were selected using ValueSense's fundamental analysis framework, focusing on companies in the advanced manufacturing, design technology, and 3D printing sectors. Selection criteria included intrinsic value calculations, Quality Ratings, free cash flow generation, revenue growth trajectories, and return on invested capital. The portfolio intentionally spans multiple profitability profiles—from established, cash-generative businesses to high-growth platforms and turnaround situations—to provide diversified exposure across the sector's risk-return spectrum.
Q2: Which stock from this list offers the best risk-adjusted opportunity?
Autodesk (ADSK) represents the highest-quality opportunity, combining a 7.0 Quality Rating, strong free cash flow generation ($2,115M annually), and sustainable revenue growth 15.5%. Proto Labs (PRLB) offers an attractive alternative for investors seeking lower leverage (0.5% debt-to-equity) and positive free cash flow $75.8M with more modest growth expectations. Both stocks trade near intrinsic value, offering fair entry points for quality-focused investors. Xometry (XMTR) appeals to growth-oriented investors willing to accept profitability challenges for exposure to a high-growth platform (22.4% revenue growth, 50.8% one-year return).
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or focus on a subset for diversification?
Portfolio construction should reflect your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Conservative investors should focus on Autodesk and Proto Labs, which offer quality, profitability, and financial stability. Moderate investors might add Xometry for growth exposure while maintaining the quality anchor. Aggressive or specialized investors might include Stratasys and Materialise as turnaround opportunities. Boxlight and 3D Systems should represent small, speculative allocations only for investors with high conviction in sector recovery and turnaround execution. Avoid concentrating excessively in 3D printing (four of seven stocks), as the sector shares common risks around technology adoption and market cycles.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these stock picks?
The portfolio's primary risk concentration is in 3D printing and additive manufacturing (Stratasys, 3D Systems, Materialise, Boxlight), which face common challenges including technology disruption, competitive intensity, and market adoption uncertainty. Profitability risks are significant for Xometry, Stratasys, 3D Systems, and Boxlight, all generating negative free cash flow. Leverage risks are elevated for Xometry (122.1% debt-to-equity) and Boxlight (491.7% debt-to-equity), limiting financial flexibility. Sector cycle risks affect all positions, as capital spending and manufacturing activity influence demand. Individual company risks include customer concentration, competitive threats, and execution risk on turnaround initiatives for distressed positions.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Timing depends on your investment approach and risk tolerance. For quality positions (Autodesk, Proto Labs), current valuations near intrinsic value suggest reasonable entry points for systematic accumulation. For growth positions (Xometry), consider initiating positions at intrinsic value levels $47.6 with plans to add on weakness. For turnaround situations (Stratasys, 3D Systems, Materialise), wait for operational inflection signals including positive free cash flow, revenue stabilization, or successful cost restructuring before committing capital. Monitor quarterly earnings reports for evidence of execution on turnaround plans. Consider sector tailwinds including digital transformation acceleration, manufacturing automation adoption, and 3D printing market expansion when evaluating entry timing. Avoid chasing momentum; instead, use ValueSense's intrinsic value calculations to identify attractive entry points aligned with fundamental value.