9 Best Devops for December 2025
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The DevOps and software infrastructure sector has emerged as a critical component of enterprise technology spending, driven by accelerating digital transformation initiatives and the shift toward cloud-native architectures. Companies in this space provide essential tools for software development, deployment, monitoring, and data management—functions that have become non-negotiable for modern enterprises.
Our selection criteria for this watchlist focuses on companies demonstrating strong revenue growth, improving cash flow generation, and reasonable valuations relative to their intrinsic value estimates. We've analyzed nine leading DevOps and infrastructure software companies, examining their quality ratings, financial metrics, and growth trajectories to identify opportunities across different risk-return profiles. This collection spans established players with proven business models to high-growth companies still optimizing profitability.
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: Snowflake Inc. (SNOW)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $84.1B |
| Quality Rating | 6.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $107.0 |
| 1Y Return | 43.7% |
| Revenue | $4,115.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | $751.3M |
| Revenue Growth | 28.4% |
| FCF margin | 18.3% |
| Gross margin | 66.9% |
| ROIC | (64.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 113.1% |
Investment Thesis
Snowflake stands as a market leader in cloud data platforms, commanding a $84.1B market capitalization with strong revenue momentum. The company generated $4.1B in annual revenue with an impressive 28.4% year-over-year growth rate, demonstrating sustained demand for its data warehousing and analytics solutions. With a 1-year return of 43.7%, the stock has already captured significant investor enthusiasm, though ValueSense's quality rating of 6.5 suggests room for operational improvement. The intrinsic value estimate of $107.0 indicates the market may be pricing in substantial future growth expectations.
Snowflake's financial profile reveals a company investing heavily in growth while maintaining strong gross margins of 66.9%. The free cash flow margin of 18.3% on $751.3M in annual FCF demonstrates the business model's underlying strength, even as the company continues to scale operations. However, the negative ROIC of -64.7% and elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 113.1% reflect the capital-intensive nature of cloud infrastructure and the company's growth-focused investment strategy.
Key Catalysts
- Continued enterprise adoption of cloud data platforms as organizations modernize analytics infrastructure
- Expansion of AI and machine learning workloads on the Snowflake platform
- International market penetration and vertical-specific solutions
- Potential margin expansion as the company scales and optimizes operations
Risk Factors
- High valuation multiples leave limited margin for error if growth decelerates
- Significant debt levels relative to equity could constrain financial flexibility
- Intense competition from cloud giants (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) offering competing solutions
- Customer concentration risk and potential for churn if competitive offerings improve
Stock #2: MongoDB, Inc. (MDB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $27.1B |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $225.4 |
| 1Y Return | 3.1% |
| Revenue | $2,218.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $243.7M |
| Revenue Growth | 21.9% |
| FCF margin | 11.0% |
| Gross margin | 72.3% |
| ROIC | (26.1%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 1.2% |
Investment Thesis
MongoDB operates as a leading provider of NoSQL database technology, serving developers and enterprises building modern applications. With a $27.1B market cap and $2.2B in revenue growing at 21.9% annually, the company has established itself as a critical infrastructure component for application development. The intrinsic value estimate of $225.4 suggests potential upside from current levels, while the quality rating of 5.8 indicates the company is still optimizing its operational efficiency. The modest 1-year return of 3.1% reflects a period of consolidation after previous gains.
The company's financial metrics reveal a maturing business model with strong gross margins of 72.3% and free cash flow generation of $243.7M (11.0% FCF margin). MongoDB's minimal debt-to-equity ratio of 1.2% provides substantial financial flexibility for strategic investments, acquisitions, or shareholder returns. The negative ROIC of -26.1% reflects the company's continued investment in growth initiatives and market expansion.
Key Catalysts
- Accelerating adoption of MongoDB Atlas cloud database platform
- Expansion of AI-powered features and developer tools
- Enterprise customer wins and increased wallet share from existing customers
- Potential for margin expansion as the platform scales and operational leverage improves
Risk Factors
- Competition from established database providers and emerging alternatives
- Customer concentration among technology and high-growth companies vulnerable to economic cycles
- Execution risk on product roadmap and feature development
- Potential for slower growth if enterprise software spending moderates
Stock #3: Open Text Corporation (OTEX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8,650.3M |
| Quality Rating | 6.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $136.5 |
| 1Y Return | 11.7% |
| Revenue | $5,187.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | $905.7M |
| Revenue Growth | (7.5%) |
| FCF margin | 17.5% |
| Gross margin | 72.5% |
| ROIC | 8.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 7.4% |
Investment Thesis
Open Text represents a more mature player in the enterprise software infrastructure space, with an $8.65B market cap and $5.2B in annual revenue. Unlike the high-growth peers in this watchlist, Open Text is experiencing revenue contraction of -7.5% year-over-year, suggesting market headwinds or portfolio challenges. However, the company maintains strong profitability metrics with a 72.5% gross margin and generates substantial free cash flow of $905.7M (17.5% FCF margin). The intrinsic value estimate of $136.5 and quality rating of 6.4 suggest the market may be undervaluing the company's cash generation capabilities.
The 11.7% 1-year return and positive ROIC of 8.2% indicate the market has begun recognizing value in the company's business model. Open Text's conservative debt-to-equity ratio of 7.4% provides financial stability, though the negative revenue growth trajectory warrants careful monitoring. This company appeals to value-oriented investors seeking cash flow generation over growth.
Key Catalysts
- Stabilization of revenue as the company completes portfolio optimization
- Potential for margin expansion through operational efficiency initiatives
- Strategic acquisitions or partnerships to reignite growth
- Increased shareholder returns through dividends or buybacks given strong cash generation
Risk Factors
- Declining revenue suggests market share loss or reduced customer demand
- Mature market for enterprise content management solutions with limited growth
- Integration challenges from past acquisitions could impact profitability
- Technology disruption from cloud-native competitors offering modern alternatives
Stock #4: Confluent, Inc. (CFLT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7,673.5M |
| Quality Rating | 5.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $28.3 |
| 1Y Return | -27.9% |
| Revenue | $1,113.1M |
| Free Cash Flow | $53.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 21.6% |
| FCF margin | 4.8% |
| Gross margin | 74.1% |
| ROIC | (62.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 98.9% |
Investment Thesis
Confluent provides event streaming infrastructure through its Apache Kafka-based platform, addressing a critical need for real-time data integration in modern enterprises. The company's $7.67B market cap and $1.1B revenue base reflect its position as a specialized infrastructure provider. With 21.6% revenue growth, Confluent demonstrates strong market demand for event streaming capabilities. However, the intrinsic value estimate of $28.3 significantly below current trading levels, combined with a quality rating of just 5.0, suggests the market may be overvaluing the company's near-term prospects.
The -27.9% 1-year return reflects investor disappointment with profitability timelines and cash flow generation. Confluent's financial profile shows the challenges of scaling a specialized infrastructure company: while gross margins are healthy at 74.1%, the free cash flow margin of just 4.8% on $53.5M in annual FCF indicates the company is still burning capital relative to revenue. The negative ROIC of -62.7% and elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 98.9% underscore the capital intensity of the business model.
Key Catalysts
- Acceleration toward profitability as the platform scales and customer adoption deepens
- Expansion of use cases beyond traditional data integration into AI/ML applications
- Enterprise customer wins and increased average contract values
- Potential strategic partnerships or acquisition by larger infrastructure providers
Risk Factors
- Significant losses and negative cash flow generation raise questions about unit economics
- High debt levels relative to cash generation capacity create financial risk
- Specialized market focus limits total addressable market compared to broader infrastructure players
- Competitive pressure from cloud providers offering native event streaming capabilities
- Execution risk on path to profitability could lead to further valuation compression
Stock #5: Elastic N.V. (ESTC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7,564.6M |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $127.7 |
| 1Y Return | -35.6% |
| Revenue | $1,609.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $302.3M |
| Revenue Growth | 17.0% |
| FCF margin | 18.8% |
| Gross margin | 75.5% |
| ROIC | (24.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 66.3% |
Investment Thesis
Elastic provides search and analytics infrastructure through its Elasticsearch platform, serving enterprises requiring powerful data search and visualization capabilities. The $7.56B market cap and $1.6B revenue base reflect Elastic's established position in the infrastructure software market. With 17.0% revenue growth, the company continues to expand despite a challenging market environment. The intrinsic value estimate of $127.7 suggests significant upside potential, though the -35.6% 1-year return indicates recent investor skepticism about valuation and profitability timelines.
Elastic's financial metrics show a company with strong gross margins of 75.5% and meaningful free cash flow generation of $302.3M (18.8% FCF margin), demonstrating the underlying business model's strength. However, the negative ROIC of -24.3% and elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 66.3% reflect continued investment in growth and the capital structure decisions made during the company's public market journey. The quality rating of 5.7 suggests room for operational improvement.
Key Catalysts
- Transition to cloud-native deployment models driving higher margins and recurring revenue
- Expansion of observability and security use cases beyond traditional search
- Enterprise customer expansion and increased adoption of premium features
- Potential for margin expansion as the platform matures and operational leverage improves
Risk Factors
- Recent stock price decline may reflect concerns about growth deceleration or competitive threats
- High debt levels relative to cash generation could limit financial flexibility
- Competition from cloud providers and specialized observability platforms
- Customer concentration risk among technology and high-growth companies
- Execution risk on product roadmap and market expansion initiatives
Stock #6: JFrog Ltd. (FROG)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7,210.8M |
| Quality Rating | 6.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $41.5 |
| 1Y Return | 95.8% |
| Revenue | $502.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $140.9M |
| Revenue Growth | 22.7% |
| FCF margin | 28.0% |
| Gross margin | 75.7% |
| ROIC | (19.8%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 1.3% |
Investment Thesis
JFrog operates a software supply chain platform enabling organizations to manage, secure, and deploy software at scale. The $7.21B market cap and $502.6M revenue base reflect JFrog's position as a specialized but growing infrastructure provider. The company's exceptional 95.8% 1-year return demonstrates strong investor confidence in its business model and market opportunity. With 22.7% revenue growth and a quality rating of 6.8 (among the highest in this watchlist), JFrog shows balanced growth and operational execution.
JFrog's financial profile is particularly attractive within this peer group: the company generates $140.9M in free cash flow with an impressive 28.0% FCF margin, indicating strong unit economics and a path toward sustainable profitability. The minimal debt-to-equity ratio of 1.3% provides financial flexibility, while the negative ROIC of -19.8% reflects the company's continued investment in growth initiatives. The intrinsic value estimate of $41.5 suggests the market may be pricing in substantial future growth expectations.
Key Catalysts
- Continued adoption of DevOps and software supply chain security practices
- Expansion into adjacent markets including security and compliance
- Enterprise customer wins and increased wallet share
- Potential for margin expansion as the platform scales and operational leverage improves
- Strong cash generation supporting potential shareholder returns or strategic investments
Risk Factors
- Valuation multiples have expanded significantly, leaving limited margin for error
- Specialized market focus limits total addressable market compared to broader infrastructure players
- Competition from established DevOps and security vendors
- Execution risk on product roadmap and market expansion initiatives
- Potential for growth deceleration if enterprise software spending moderates
Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.
Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?
Find Hidden Gems First!
Stock #7: GitLab Inc. (GTLB)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6,835.6M |
| Quality Rating | 5.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $49.4 |
| 1Y Return | -35.6% |
| Revenue | $857.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | $35.8M |
| Revenue Growth | 29.0% |
| FCF margin | 4.2% |
| Gross margin | 88.5% |
| ROIC | (22.2%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
GitLab provides an integrated DevOps platform consolidating multiple tools into a single application, addressing the fragmentation challenge in software development workflows. The $6.84B market cap and $857.9M revenue base reflect GitLab's rapid growth trajectory, with an impressive 29.0% year-over-year revenue growth rate. However, the -35.6% 1-year return and quality rating of 5.0 indicate investor concerns about profitability and cash flow generation. The intrinsic value estimate of $49.4 suggests potential upside, though significant execution is required.
GitLab's financial profile reveals a company prioritizing growth over profitability: while gross margins are exceptional at 88.5%, the free cash flow margin of just 4.2% on $35.8M in annual FCF indicates the company is still investing heavily in sales, marketing, and product development. The zero debt-to-equity ratio provides financial flexibility, but the negative ROIC of -22.2% reflects the capital intensity of scaling a platform business. This company represents a higher-risk, higher-reward opportunity for growth-oriented investors.
Key Catalysts
- Acceleration of DevOps platform consolidation as enterprises seek to reduce tool sprawl
- Expansion of AI-powered features and automation capabilities
- Enterprise customer wins and increased average contract values
- Path to profitability as the platform scales and operational leverage improves
- Potential for margin expansion through improved customer acquisition efficiency
Risk Factors
- Significant losses and minimal cash flow generation raise questions about unit economics
- High growth rate may not be sustainable as the company matures
- Intense competition from established DevOps vendors and point solution providers
- Customer concentration risk among technology and high-growth companies
- Execution risk on profitability roadmap could lead to further valuation compression
Stock #8: Jamf Holding Corp. (JAMF)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,717.7M |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $42.7 |
| 1Y Return | -11.4% |
| Revenue | $690.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $110.2M |
| Revenue Growth | 12.3% |
| FCF margin | 16.0% |
| Gross margin | 76.8% |
| ROIC | (2.6%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 49.8% |
Investment Thesis
Jamf specializes in Apple device management and security, serving enterprises managing large fleets of iPhones, iPads, and Macs. The $1.72B market cap and $690.6M revenue base reflect Jamf's position as a focused infrastructure provider in the Apple ecosystem. With 12.3% revenue growth and a quality rating of 5.8, Jamf demonstrates steady business execution in a specialized market. The -11.4% 1-year return suggests recent market volatility, while the intrinsic value estimate of $42.7 indicates potential value at current levels.
Jamf's financial metrics show a maturing business model with strong gross margins of 76.8% and solid free cash flow generation of $110.2M (16.0% FCF margin). The debt-to-equity ratio of 49.8% reflects moderate leverage, while the negative ROIC of -2.6% suggests the company is approaching breakeven on return metrics. This company appeals to value investors seeking cash flow generation with moderate growth.
Key Catalysts
- Continued growth in Apple device adoption within enterprises
- Expansion of security and compliance features addressing regulatory requirements
- International market penetration and vertical-specific solutions
- Potential for margin expansion through operational efficiency initiatives
- Strong cash generation supporting potential shareholder returns
Risk Factors
- Dependence on Apple ecosystem limits total addressable market
- Slower growth rate compared to broader DevOps peers
- Competition from Apple's native management capabilities and other device management vendors
- Customer concentration risk among enterprise technology buyers
- Potential for disruption if Apple changes device management strategy
Stock #9: PagerDuty, Inc. (PD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,103.2M |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $48.4 |
| 1Y Return | -43.5% |
| Revenue | $489.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $114.7M |
| Revenue Growth | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 23.5% |
| Gross margin | 84.4% |
| ROIC | 54.5% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 120.4% |
Investment Thesis
PagerDuty provides incident response and on-call management software, helping enterprises respond to and resolve operational incidents faster. The $1.1B market cap and $489.2M revenue base reflect PagerDuty's position as a specialized infrastructure provider in the observability and incident management space. With 7.0% revenue growth and a quality rating of 6.3, PagerDuty demonstrates steady business execution, though growth has moderated compared to earlier periods. The -43.5% 1-year return reflects significant investor disappointment, while the intrinsic value estimate of $48.4 suggests potential value at current levels.
PagerDuty's financial profile is particularly attractive: the company generates $114.7M in free cash flow with an impressive 23.5% FCF margin, indicating strong unit economics and a path toward sustainable profitability. The positive ROIC of 54.5% (the highest in this watchlist) demonstrates exceptional capital efficiency. However, the elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 120.4% reflects leverage taken on during the company's growth phase, which could constrain financial flexibility.
Key Catalysts
- Stabilization of growth as the company matures and market adoption deepens
- Expansion of AI-powered incident resolution and automation capabilities
- Enterprise customer wins and increased wallet share from existing customers
- Potential for margin expansion as the platform scales and operational leverage improves
- Strong cash generation supporting potential shareholder returns or debt reduction
Risk Factors
- Slowing revenue growth suggests market maturation or competitive pressures
- High debt levels relative to market cap could limit financial flexibility
- Specialized market focus limits total addressable market compared to broader infrastructure players
- Competition from observability platforms and incident management vendors
- Potential for further valuation compression if growth continues to decelerate
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This nine-stock watchlist provides meaningful diversification across the DevOps and software infrastructure landscape, spanning different growth profiles, profitability stages, and market capitalizations.
Growth Profile Distribution: The portfolio includes high-growth companies (GitLab at 29.0% revenue growth, Snowflake at 28.4%) alongside more mature players (PagerDuty at 7.0%, Jamf at 12.3%). This mix allows investors to balance exposure to emerging opportunities with more established business models.
Profitability Spectrum: The collection ranges from highly profitable cash generators (PagerDuty with 54.5% ROIC and 23.5% FCF margin) to growth-stage companies still investing heavily in market expansion (Confluent with 4.8% FCF margin and -62.7% ROIC). This diversity enables investors to construct portfolios aligned with their risk tolerance and investment horizon.
Market Capitalization Range: From PagerDuty's $1.1B market cap to Snowflake's $84.1B, the watchlist spans the full spectrum of infrastructure software companies. Smaller-cap companies offer higher growth potential but greater volatility, while larger-cap names provide more stability and liquidity.
Sector Specialization: The portfolio covers distinct infrastructure domains—data platforms (Snowflake, MongoDB), event streaming (Confluent), search and analytics (Elastic), software supply chain (JFrog), DevOps consolidation (GitLab), Apple device management (Jamf), incident response (PagerDuty), and enterprise content management (Open Text). This specialization ensures exposure to multiple infrastructure trends rather than concentration in a single market segment.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Dollar-Cost Averaging: Given the volatility in software infrastructure stocks, particularly among growth-stage companies, consider implementing a dollar-cost averaging strategy. This approach involves investing fixed amounts at regular intervals, reducing the impact of short-term price fluctuations and allowing you to build positions over time.
Valuation-Based Entry Points: Compare current stock prices to ValueSense's intrinsic value estimates to identify attractive entry opportunities. Stocks trading significantly below intrinsic value (such as Confluent at $28.3 estimated value) may represent compelling opportunities for patient investors willing to wait for the market to recognize value.
Sector Rotation Timing: Monitor enterprise software spending trends and DevOps adoption cycles. Entry points may improve during periods of economic uncertainty when growth stocks face valuation pressure, creating opportunities for long-term investors with conviction in the sector's fundamentals.
Earnings-Driven Catalysts: Consider timing entries around earnings announcements when companies provide forward guidance. Positive surprises on revenue growth, margin expansion, or cash flow generation can validate investment theses and provide momentum for positions.
Technical Support Levels: While ValueSense focuses on fundamental analysis, identifying technical support levels can help optimize entry timing. Stocks that have declined significantly (such as GitLab at -35.6% 1-year return) may find support at key technical levels, creating lower-risk entry opportunities.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- How VKTX (Viking Therapeutics) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How NET (Cloudflare) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How MASS (908 Devices) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How CRVO (CervoMed) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
- How GILD (Gilead Sciences) Makes Money in 2025: A Deep-Dive With Income Statement
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these nine stocks selected for this watchlist?
These stocks were selected based on their prominence in the DevOps and software infrastructure ecosystem, combined with fundamental analysis using ValueSense's comprehensive metrics. The selection criteria included revenue growth rates, free cash flow generation, gross margins, quality ratings, and intrinsic value estimates. The portfolio intentionally includes companies across different growth stages and profitability profiles to provide diversified exposure to infrastructure software trends.
Q2: Which stock from this list offers the best risk-adjusted opportunity?
JFrog (FROG) presents a compelling risk-adjusted opportunity, combining strong revenue growth 22.7%, exceptional free cash flow margins 28.0%, a high quality rating 6.8, and minimal debt (1.3% debt-to-equity). The company's 95.8% 1-year return reflects market recognition of its business model strength, though the intrinsic value estimate of $41.5 suggests the market may be pricing in substantial future growth. For value-oriented investors, Open Text (OTEX) offers attractive cash flow generation (17.5% FCF margin) with a positive ROIC 8.2% and conservative valuation.
Q3: Should I invest in all nine stocks or focus on a subset?
The optimal approach depends on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and portfolio size. A diversified approach investing in 5-7 stocks from this list provides meaningful exposure to infrastructure software trends while managing concentration risk. Growth-oriented investors might focus on high-growth companies (GitLab, Snowflake, Confluent), while value investors might emphasize cash flow generators (Open Text, PagerDuty, Jamf). Consider your existing portfolio holdings to avoid overconcentration in technology stocks.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these stock picks?
The primary risks include valuation compression if growth decelerates, competitive pressure from cloud providers and established software vendors, and execution risk on profitability timelines for growth-stage companies. Several companies (Confluent, GitLab, Elastic) carry elevated debt levels relative to cash generation, creating financial risk if business conditions deteriorate. Additionally, many companies depend on enterprise software spending, which could moderate during economic downturns. Individual stock risks are detailed in the risk factors sections above.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Infrastructure software stocks typically perform well during periods of strong enterprise technology spending and digital transformation initiatives. However, individual entry timing depends on valuation relative to intrinsic value and your investment horizon. For long-term investors, dollar-cost averaging into positions over time reduces timing risk. Consider using ValueSense's intrinsic value estimates to identify attractive entry points when stocks trade at meaningful discounts to fair value. Shorter-term traders might focus on technical support levels and earnings catalysts.