10 Best Energy Storage for February 2026
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The energy storage sector is experiencing rapid growth driven by the global shift to renewable energy, electric vehicles, and grid modernization. Value Sense analysis highlights stocks with strong intrinsic value potential, focusing on companies where current market prices may diverge from calculated fair values based on fundamentals like revenue, free cash flow (FCF), ROIC, and margins. These 10 best energy storage stock picks were selected using Value Sense's machine learning-powered screener, prioritizing Quality ratings above 5.5, significant undervaluation gaps (intrinsic value notably higher or lower than implied pricing), and exposure to high-growth themes like battery tech and infrastructure. Methodology emphasizes ROIC, FCF margins, debt levels, and 1Y returns to balance growth with quality, curated from pre-built watchlists on energy storage opportunities. This educational analysis frames undervalued stocks to buy in the sector for diversified watchlists.
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,404.2B |
| Quality Rating | 6.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $41.3 |
| 1Y Return | 7.5% |
| Revenue | $94.8B |
| Free Cash Flow | $6,220.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (2.9%) |
| FCF margin | 6.6% |
| Gross margin | 18.0% |
| ROIC | 5.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 10.1% |
Investment Thesis
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) stands out with a massive Market Cap of $1,404.2B and Quality rating of 6.5, reflecting solid operational scale in energy storage and EVs. Despite a modest 1Y Return of 7.5%, its Revenue of $94.8B and positive Free Cash Flow of $6,220.0M underscore efficiency, with a FCF margin of 6.6% and Gross margin of 18.0%. ROIC at 5.6% and low Total Debt to Equity of 10.1% indicate financial health, though slight Revenue growth decline of 2.9% suggests maturing growth phase. Value Sense's Intrinsic value of $41.3 points to potential overvaluation at current levels, offering educational insights into balancing scale with valuation discipline in energy storage leaders.
This analysis highlights TSLA's role in battery production and Megapack deployments, where high revenue supports ecosystem dominance despite slower growth.
Key Catalysts
- Dominant position in EV and energy storage scaling Revenue to $94.8B
- Strong Free Cash Flow generation at $6,220.0M for R&D reinvestment
- Improving margins with Gross margin at 18.0% amid production ramps
Risk Factors
- Modest Revenue growth of 2.9% signaling potential saturation
- Intrinsic value of $41.3 suggesting overvaluation risk
- Competitive pressures in energy storage market
Stock #2: Vistra Corp. (VST)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $54.2B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $119.0 |
| 1Y Return | -10.2% |
| Revenue | $4,037.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,381.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (75.2%) |
| FCF margin | 59.0% |
| Gross margin | 39.6% |
| ROIC | 5.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
Vistra Corp. (VST), with a Market Cap of $54.2B and Quality rating of 6.2, offers robust cash flow in power generation tied to energy storage needs. Free Cash Flow of $2,381.0M yields an impressive FCF margin of 59.0%, complemented by Gross margin of 39.6% and zero Total Debt to Equity at 0.0%. Despite a 1Y Return dip to -10.2% and sharp Revenue growth contraction to 75.2% on $4,037.0M revenue, ROIC of 5.0% supports stability. Intrinsic value at $119.0 indicates significant upside potential per Value Sense models, ideal for analyzing utility-scale storage plays.
VST's debt-free balance sheet positions it well for sector expansion, providing a conservative anchor in volatile energy markets.
Key Catalysts
- Exceptional FCF margin of 59.0% driving financial flexibility
- Zero Total Debt to Equity enabling aggressive storage investments
- High Gross margin of 39.6% from efficient operations
Risk Factors
- Severe Revenue growth decline of 75.2% warranting scrutiny
- Negative 1Y Return of -10.2% amid market headwinds
- Dependency on energy price volatility
Stock #3: Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9,301.0M |
| Quality Rating | 5.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $192.2 |
| 1Y Return | -1.9% |
| Revenue | $4,291.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $397.5M |
| Revenue Growth | (9.0%) |
| FCF margin | 9.3% |
| Gross margin | 33.8% |
| ROIC | 5.7% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 108.3% |
Investment Thesis
Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) features a Market Cap of $9,301.0M and Quality rating of 5.9, focused on cryogenic equipment vital for energy storage infrastructure. Revenue of $4,291.2M generates Free Cash Flow of $397.5M with FCF margin 9.3% and Gross margin 33.8%; ROIC at 5.7% shows capital efficiency despite Revenue growth of 9.0% and 1Y Return of -1.9%. Elevated Total Debt to Equity of 108.3% is offset by Intrinsic value of $192.2, signaling undervaluation for long-term storage demand.
This profile suits investors studying industrial enablers in the clean energy transition.
Key Catalysts
- Strong Gross margin of 33.8% supporting profitability
- ROIC of 5.7% indicating effective capital use
- High Intrinsic value of $192.2 vs. current metrics
Risk Factors
- High Total Debt to Equity at 108.3% increasing leverage risk
- Negative Revenue growth of 9.0% and flat 1Y Return
- Cyclical exposure to energy infrastructure spending
Stock #4: Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6,936.5M |
| Quality Rating | 6.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $43.5 |
| 1Y Return | 250.8% |
| Revenue | $487.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($966.4M) |
| Revenue Growth | 36.0% |
| FCF margin | (198.4%) |
| Gross margin | 59.6% |
| ROIC | 5.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 230.8% |
Investment Thesis
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) boasts a Market Cap of $6,936.5M and top Quality rating of 6.7, with explosive 1Y Return of 250.8% driven by Revenue growth of 36.0% to $487.2M. High Gross margin of 59.6% shines, but negative Free Cash Flow of $966.4M yields FCF margin of 198.4%, ROIC 5.2%, and lofty Total Debt to Equity 230.8%. Intrinsic value at $43.5 suggests measured opportunity in renewables-tied storage.
ENLT exemplifies high-growth renewables with storage integration potential.
Key Catalysts
- Stellar 1Y Return of 250.8% and Revenue growth 36.0%
- Premium Gross margin of 59.6% from project efficiencies
- Elevated Quality rating 6.7 for renewable leadership
Risk Factors
- Negative FCF $966.4M and FCF margin 198.4%
- Very high Total Debt to Equity 230.8%
- Growth sustainability post-rapid expansion
Stock #5: EnerSys (ENS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6,756.5M |
| Quality Rating | 6.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $155.9 |
| 1Y Return | 83.5% |
| Revenue | $3,725.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $326.8M |
| Revenue Growth | 6.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.8% |
| Gross margin | 30.4% |
| ROIC | 14.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 65.0% |
Investment Thesis
EnerSys (ENS) delivers Market Cap $6,756.5M and leading Quality rating 6.8, with 1Y Return 83.5% on Revenue $3,725.3M growing 6.2%. Positive Free Cash Flow $326.8M (FCF margin 8.8%), Gross margin 30.4%, standout ROIC 14.8%, and Total Debt to Equity 65.0% highlight battery storage strength. Intrinsic value $155.9 flags undervaluation.
ENS provides stable industrial battery solutions for energy applications.
Key Catalysts
- Highest ROIC 14.8% among peers
- Positive FCF $326.8M and growth 6.2%
- Strong Quality rating 6.8 with solid margins
Risk Factors
- Moderate Total Debt to Equity 65.0%
- Slower Revenue growth vs. hyper-growth peers
- Competition in industrial energy storage
Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.
Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?
Find Hidden Gems First!
Stock #6: Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5,721.8M |
| Quality Rating | 7.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $150.7 |
| 1Y Return | 15.1% |
| Revenue | $3,656.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $869.4M |
| Revenue Growth | (0.1%) |
| FCF margin | 23.8% |
| Gross margin | 62.7% |
| ROIC | 9.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 613.6% |
Investment Thesis
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) has Market Cap $5,721.8M and peak Quality rating 7.2, with steady 1Y Return 15.1%. Revenue $3,656.0M shows flat growth 0.1%, but Free Cash Flow $869.4M (FCF margin 23.8%) and Gross margin 62.7% excel; ROIC 9.3% despite high Total Debt to Equity 613.6%. Intrinsic value $150.7 indicates value in infra-tied storage.
BIPC offers yield-focused exposure to energy infrastructure.
Key Catalysts
- Top Quality rating 7.2 and FCF margin 23.8%
- Exceptional Gross margin 62.7%
- Reliable ROIC 9.3% for infrastructure stability
Risk Factors
- Extreme Total Debt to Equity 613.6%
- Near-zero Revenue growth 0.1%
- Interest rate sensitivity in leveraged infra
Stock #7: QuantumScape Corporation (QS)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5,224.1M |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $1.5 |
| 1Y Return | 70.2% |
| Revenue | $0.0 |
| Free Cash Flow | ($280.1M) |
| Revenue Growth | (100.0%) |
| FCF margin | N/A |
| Gross margin | N/A |
| ROIC | (156.2%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 11.3% |
Investment Thesis
QuantumScape Corporation (QS) at Market Cap $5,224.1M and Quality rating 5.8 is pre-revenue with 1Y Return 70.2%, Revenue $0.0, negative Free Cash Flow $280.1M, ROIC 156.2%, low Total Debt to Equity 11.3%. Intrinsic value $1.5 highlights speculative solid-state battery tech.
QS represents high-risk innovation in next-gen storage.
Key Catalysts
- Strong 1Y Return 70.2% on tech hype
- Low Total Debt to Equity 11.3% preserving flexibility
- Potential breakthrough in solid-state batteries
Risk Factors
- Zero Revenue and negative FCF $280.1M
- Poor ROIC 156.2%
- Development delays in commercialization
Stock #8: Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4,077.8M |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $87.4 |
| 1Y Return | 122.6% |
| Revenue | $2,262.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($154.1M) |
| Revenue Growth | (16.1%) |
| FCF margin | (6.8%) |
| Gross margin | 13.1% |
| ROIC | (3.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 71.2% |
Investment Thesis
Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) shows Market Cap $4,077.8M, Quality rating 5.7, 1Y Return 122.6% on Revenue $2,262.8M despite 16.1% growth. Negative Free Cash Flow $154.1M, FCF margin 6.8%, low Gross margin 13.1%, ROIC 3.7%, Total Debt to Equity 71.2%. Intrinsic value $87.4 suggests upside.
FLNC targets grid-scale storage solutions.
Key Catalysts
- Impressive 1Y Return 122.6%
- Scale in Revenue $2,262.8M
- Intrinsic value $87.4 undervaluation potential
Risk Factors
- Negative FCF and ROIC 3.7%
- Declining Revenue growth 16.1%
- Moderate debt at 71.2%
Stock #9: Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4,023.0M |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $10.5 |
| 1Y Return | 152.0% |
| Revenue | $63.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($245.5M) |
| Revenue Growth | 324.1% |
| FCF margin | (386.9%) |
| Gross margin | (177.9%) |
| ROIC | (213.7%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | (45.4%) |
Investment Thesis
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) with Market Cap $4,023.0M and Quality rating 5.7 posts 1Y Return 152.0%, explosive Revenue growth 324.1% to $63.5M. However, Free Cash Flow $245.5M, FCF margin 386.9%, negative Gross margin 177.9%, ROIC 213.7%, odd Total Debt to Equity 45.4%. Intrinsic value $10.5 for zinc-based storage.
EOSE captures early-stage growth risks.
Key Catalysts
- Hyper Revenue growth 324.1% and 1Y Return 152.0%
- Innovative zinc tech for storage
- Expansion potential in niche batteries
Risk Factors
- Severe losses: FCF margin 386.9%, ROIC 213.7%
- Negative Gross margin 177.9%
- Negative equity implications
Stock #10: Amprius Technologies, Inc. (AMPX)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,553.8M |
| Quality Rating | 5.5 |
| Intrinsic Value | $5.1 |
| 1Y Return | 272.5% |
| Revenue | $57.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($35.1M) |
| Revenue Growth | 230.7% |
| FCF margin | (60.8%) |
| Gross margin | (1.0%) |
| ROIC | (51.2%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 36.5% |
Investment Thesis
Amprius Technologies, Inc. (AMPX) at Market Cap $1,553.8M, Quality rating 5.5, leads with 1Y Return 272.5% and Revenue growth 230.7% to $57.8M. Negative Free Cash Flow $35.1M, FCF margin 60.8%, slim Gross margin 1.0%, ROIC 51.2%, Total Debt to Equity 36.5%. Intrinsic value $5.1 for silicon-anode batteries.
AMPX embodies speculative high-growth in advanced storage.
Key Catalysts
- Top 1Y Return 272.5% and Revenue growth 230.7%
- Breakthrough silicon tech potential
- Improving scale from low base
Risk Factors
- Negative FCF and ROIC 51.2%
- Low Gross margin 1.0%
- Early-stage profitability challenges
Portfolio Diversification Insights
These energy storage stock picks cluster in renewables (ENLT, BIPC), batteries (ENS, QS, FLNC, EOSE, AMPX), infrastructure (GTLS, VST), and mega-cap (TSLA), offering sector allocation across established cash generators (VST, ENS, BIPC with positive FCF) and high-growth spec plays (EOSE, AMPX with 150%+ 1Y returns). Balance 40% in quality leaders like BIPC (7.2 rating) and ENS (14.8% ROIC) for stability, 30% in mid-caps like GTLS and ENLT for growth, and 30% in speculative like QS and AMPX for upside. Cross-references show debt-heavy firms (BIPC 613.6%, ENLT 230.8%) complement low-debt like VST 0.0%, reducing overall portfolio leverage while capturing storage megatrend. This mix enhances diversification against EV slowdowns or grid delays.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Consider positions during sector pullbacks, such as post-earnings dips or when intrinsic value gaps widen (e.g., GTLS at $192.2, FLNC $87.4). Ladder entries: allocate 25% now to quality picks like ENS and BIPC with positive FCF/ROIC, add on 10-20% drops for growth names like AMPX amid volatility. Monitor ROIC trends and macroeconomic shifts like falling rates boosting debt-heavy plays. Use Value Sense screeners for real-time undervalued stocks signals, scaling in over 3-6 months for averaged costs in this high-beta sector.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- Nelson Peltz - Trian Fund Management Portfolio Q3'2025: Top Holdings & Recent Changes
- Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order by Ray Dalio
- The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson
- Principles for Navigating Big Debt Crises by Ray Dalio
- Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini Ph.D.
FAQ Section
How were these stocks selected?
These 10 best energy storage stock picks were curated via Value Sense's automated screener using Quality ratings, intrinsic value discrepancies, ROIC, FCF metrics, and sector relevance for comprehensive stock watchlist coverage.
What's the best stock from this list?
Brookfield Infrastructure (BIPC) leads with the highest Quality rating 7.2, strong FCF margin 23.8%, and ROIC 9.3%, balancing yield and stability among these top stocks to buy now.
Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversify across established (e.g., VST, ENS) and growth (e.g., AMPX, EOSE) for balanced portfolio diversification insights, avoiding concentration in high-debt or negative FCF names.
What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include high debt (BIPC 613.6%, ENLT 230.8%), negative FCF/ROIC in spec plays (QS, EOSE), and revenue volatility, emphasizing need for risk-adjusted stock analysis.
When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal timing aligns with sector dips, improving macros, or intrinsic value expansions; use phased entries for volatile growth stocks like EOSE amid energy storage demand ramps.