6 Best Food Delivery for February 2026

Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io

Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.

Market Overview & Selection Criteria

The gig economy and food delivery sectors have emerged as transformative forces in modern commerce, reshaping how consumers access services and how businesses operate. These industries combine technology-driven efficiency with essential consumer demand, creating compelling investment opportunities for value-focused investors.

Our selection methodology prioritizes companies demonstrating strong free cash flow generation, sustainable revenue growth, and reasonable valuations relative to intrinsic value. We evaluate each company across multiple dimensions: profitability metrics (gross margin, FCF margin), capital efficiency (ROIC), financial health (debt-to-equity ratios), and growth trajectories. This comprehensive approach identifies businesses that balance near-term profitability with long-term expansion potential—the hallmark of quality value investments.

The six stocks featured in this analysis represent varying risk-return profiles within the gig economy ecosystem, allowing investors to construct diversified portfolios aligned with their risk tolerance and investment horizon.

Featured Stock Analysis

Stock #1: Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)

Investment Thesis

Uber Technologies stands as the dominant global platform connecting millions of drivers and riders across ridesharing, food delivery, and freight services. With a market capitalization of $166.9B and annual revenue of $49.6B, UBER has achieved significant scale while maintaining impressive profitability metrics. The company's quality rating of 7.2 reflects strong operational execution and financial discipline.

The investment case for UBER centers on its exceptional capital efficiency and cash generation capability. With a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 91.6%—among the highest in the portfolio—UBER demonstrates that its platform economics create substantial shareholder value. The company generated $8.661B in free cash flow on $49.6B in revenue, translating to a 17.5% FCF margin. This cash generation provides flexibility for shareholder returns, strategic investments, and debt reduction. Over the past year, UBER delivered a 20.2% return, reflecting investor confidence in its business model and growth prospects.

The company's gross margin of 39.7% and revenue growth of 18.2% indicate balanced expansion across its service lines. While the debt-to-equity ratio of 41.8% represents moderate leverage, UBER's cash generation capacity provides substantial coverage for debt obligations.

Key Catalysts

• Expansion of Uber Eats into new geographic markets and service categories
• International ridesharing growth in emerging markets
• Freight and logistics segment scaling
• Potential profitability improvements from AI-driven route optimization
• Strategic partnerships in autonomous vehicle technology

Risk Factors

• Regulatory challenges regarding driver classification and labor laws across jurisdictions
• Competitive pressure from regional ridesharing platforms
• Sensitivity to macroeconomic conditions affecting consumer discretionary spending
• Execution risk on international expansion initiatives
• Potential margin compression from increased driver compensation demands

Stock #2: DoorDash, Inc. (DASH)

Investment Thesis

DoorDash has established itself as the leading food delivery platform in North America, commanding significant market share with a $88.2B market capitalization. The company's quality rating of 7.2 matches UBER's assessment, reflecting comparable operational excellence. DASH generated $12.6B in annual revenue with particularly impressive profitability characteristics: a 50.5% gross margin—the highest in this portfolio—and a 17.6% FCF margin.

The investment narrative for DASH emphasizes margin expansion and operational leverage. The company's exceptional gross margin reflects its ability to monetize delivery services while maintaining competitive pricing. With $2.227B in free cash flow generation, DASH demonstrates that food delivery can be a highly profitable business model when executed at scale. The 24.5% revenue growth rate—the fastest in this group—indicates sustained market demand and successful market penetration strategies.

However, investors should note the more modest 8.5% one-year return compared to UBER, suggesting the market has already priced in much of DASH's growth story. The ROIC of 10.3% is respectable but lower than UBER's, indicating slightly less efficient capital deployment despite superior gross margins.

Key Catalysts

• Expansion of convenience and grocery delivery services
• International market entry opportunities
• Advertising platform growth and monetization
• Operational efficiency improvements reducing delivery costs
• Potential strategic partnerships with restaurants and retailers

Risk Factors

• Intense competition from UBER Eats and regional competitors
• Dependence on restaurant partner relationships and commission negotiations
• Driver availability and retention challenges
• Sensitivity to restaurant industry health and consumer dining patterns
• Regulatory pressures on gig worker classification

Stock #3: Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB)

Investment Thesis

Grab represents the leading Southeast Asian super-app, operating across ridesharing, food delivery, and financial services in one of the world's fastest-growing regions. With a market cap of $17.9B and a quality rating of 6.3, GRAB offers exposure to high-growth emerging markets with a diversified service portfolio. The company generated $3.229B in annual revenue with 20.2% growth—matching DoorDash's expansion rate.

The investment case for GRAB emphasizes geographic growth potential and market consolidation benefits. Southeast Asia's rapidly urbanizing population and rising middle class create substantial tailwinds for gig economy services. GRAB's 43.1% gross margin reflects reasonable monetization of its platform services. However, the company's profitability profile differs from its North American peers: the 8.0% FCF margin and 1.9% ROIC indicate that GRAB is still in a growth-investment phase, prioritizing market share expansion over near-term profitability.

The negative 7.3% one-year return reflects market concerns about profitability timelines and competitive dynamics in Southeast Asia. The intrinsic value of $5.3 suggests the market may be pricing in execution risks, though this also presents potential upside for patient investors who believe in the region's long-term growth trajectory.

Key Catalysts

• Profitability inflection as the platform reaches scale in core markets
• Expansion of financial services (GrabPay, insurance, lending)
• Market consolidation reducing competitive intensity
• Rising smartphone penetration and digital payment adoption in Southeast Asia
• Potential strategic partnerships or acquisitions

Risk Factors

• Intense competition from local and regional competitors
• Regulatory uncertainty in Southeast Asian markets
• Currency fluctuation risks across multiple operating countries
• Path to profitability remains uncertain despite revenue growth
• Lower capital efficiency compared to North American peers
• Geopolitical risks in the region

Stock #4: Instacart (Maplebear Inc.) (CART)

Investment Thesis

Instacart operates as the dominant online grocery delivery platform in North America, with a $9.814B market capitalization and a quality rating of 6.7. The company generated $3.633B in annual revenue with an exceptional 74.5% gross margin—the highest in this entire portfolio. This margin profile reflects Instacart's asset-light model, where the company primarily facilitates transactions between consumers and retail partners rather than managing inventory.

The investment thesis for CART centers on exceptional profitability metrics and capital efficiency. With a 24.2% FCF margin and 27.0% ROIC, Instacart demonstrates that grocery delivery can generate substantial returns on invested capital. The company's minimal debt (1.1% debt-to-equity ratio) provides financial flexibility and reduces financial risk. However, the 10.2% revenue growth rate is the slowest in this portfolio, suggesting market maturation in core North American markets.

The negative 24.0% one-year return represents the most significant underperformance in this group, likely reflecting market concerns about growth deceleration and competitive pressures. However, the company's strong profitability and fortress balance sheet may appeal to value investors seeking stability within the gig economy sector.

Key Catalysts

• International expansion into new geographic markets
• Expansion of advertising and promotional services
• Integration of new retail partners and product categories
• Technology improvements enhancing delivery speed and economics
• Potential strategic acquisitions or partnerships

Risk Factors

• Slowest revenue growth rate in the portfolio indicates market saturation
• Significant one-year underperformance may reflect structural headwinds
• Competition from Amazon Fresh, Walmart+, and traditional grocery delivery
• Dependence on retail partner relationships and commission structures
• Consumer price sensitivity during economic downturns
• Limited international presence compared to competitors

Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.

Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?

Find Hidden Gems First!

Stock #5: Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL)

Investment Thesis

Dingdong operates as a leading community e-commerce platform in China, focusing on fresh grocery and daily necessities delivery. With a market cap of $617.5M and a quality rating of 6.2, DDL represents the smallest company in this portfolio but offers exposure to China's rapidly evolving retail landscape. The company generated CN¥24.0B in annual revenue with 8.4% growth.

The investment case for DDL emphasizes exceptional capital efficiency despite modest growth rates. The company's 26.8% ROIC is among the highest in this portfolio, indicating efficient capital deployment in a competitive Chinese market. However, the 1.2% FCF margin reveals that despite strong ROIC, the company converts only a small portion of revenue into free cash flow—a critical distinction for investors evaluating cash generation capability.

The negative 17.8% one-year return and the elevated 213.8% debt-to-equity ratio present significant concerns. This leverage level is substantially higher than all other portfolio companies and indicates meaningful financial risk. The intrinsic value of CN¥8.3 suggests the market is pricing in execution challenges and competitive pressures in China's intensely competitive e-commerce sector.

Key Catalysts

• Expansion into new Chinese cities and regions
• Improvement in unit economics and delivery efficiency
• Potential debt reduction and balance sheet strengthening
• Technology innovations in supply chain and logistics
• Strategic partnerships with suppliers and retailers

Risk Factors

• Extremely high debt-to-equity ratio 213.8% creates financial distress risk
• Minimal free cash flow generation despite revenue growth
• Intense competition from Alibaba, JD.com, and other e-commerce platforms
• Chinese regulatory environment and potential policy changes
• Currency risk for investors holding Chinese yuan-denominated assets
• Unproven path to sustainable profitability at current leverage levels

Stock #6: WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS)

Investment Thesis

WM Technology operates as a digital platform serving the cannabis industry, providing tools for retailers, consumers, and businesses to connect and transact. With a market cap of $82.4M and a quality rating of 5.4, MAPS represents the smallest and most speculative investment in this portfolio. The company generated $179.3M in annual revenue with minimal 0.6% growth, indicating a mature or challenged business model.

The investment narrative for MAPS is distinctly different from the other portfolio companies. Rather than a high-growth platform business, MAPS represents a niche digital infrastructure play in an emerging industry. The company's exceptional 95.0% gross margin reflects its software and platform-based business model with minimal cost of goods sold. However, the 5.7% FCF margin and 8.9% ROIC indicate modest cash generation and capital efficiency relative to the company's size.

The dramatic 44.4% one-year decline and the lowest quality rating 5.4 in the portfolio suggest significant market skepticism. The intrinsic value of $7.9 implies the market is pricing in substantial execution risks, regulatory uncertainties, and potential business model challenges. This position is suitable only for investors with high risk tolerance and conviction in cannabis industry legalization trends.

Key Catalysts

• Federal cannabis legalization or rescheduling in the United States
• Expansion into new cannabis markets as regulations evolve
• Monetization improvements and advertising platform growth
• International expansion into legal cannabis markets
• Potential strategic acquisitions or partnerships

Risk Factors

• Minimal revenue growth indicates business model challenges or market saturation
• Severe one-year underperformance reflects significant market concerns
• Regulatory uncertainty regarding cannabis legality and industry structure
• Dependence on cannabis industry growth and legalization trends
• Limited profitability and modest cash generation
• Smallest market cap creates liquidity and volatility risks
• Potential for further regulatory headwinds or industry disruption

Portfolio Diversification Insights

This six-stock portfolio offers meaningful diversification across multiple dimensions within the gig economy and digital commerce ecosystem:

Geographic Diversification: The portfolio spans North America (UBER, DASH, CART, MAPS), Southeast Asia (GRAB), and China (DDL), providing exposure to different economic cycles and regulatory environments. This geographic spread reduces concentration risk from any single region's economic slowdown or regulatory changes.

Business Model Diversity: The portfolio includes ridesharing (UBER), food delivery (DASH, UBER), grocery delivery (CART), super-app services (GRAB), community e-commerce (DDL), and cannabis retail infrastructure (MAPS). This diversity ensures that portfolio performance isn't dependent on any single service category's success.

Profitability Profile: The portfolio ranges from highly profitable, cash-generative businesses (DASH, CART, UBER) to growth-stage companies still investing for scale (GRAB) to challenged businesses seeking profitability (DDL, MAPS). This mix allows investors to balance near-term cash generation with long-term growth potential.

Risk-Return Characteristics: The portfolio includes established market leaders with proven business models (UBER, DASH) alongside emerging opportunities with higher risk but greater upside potential (GRAB, DDL, MAPS). This structure accommodates different investor risk appetites within a single portfolio.

Sector Concentration: While all companies operate within the gig economy and digital commerce space, their specific niches (ridesharing, food delivery, grocery, super-app, e-commerce, cannabis) provide meaningful operational diversification. A downturn in one service category may not significantly impact others.

Market Timing & Entry Strategies

Valuation-Based Entry Points: The portfolio presents varied valuation opportunities. UBER and DASH trade near or above intrinsic value, suggesting these are maintenance positions rather than aggressive accumulation opportunities. GRAB, CART, DDL, and MAPS trade at discounts to intrinsic value, potentially offering better entry points for new capital. Value investors should prioritize accumulating positions in undervalued names while maintaining existing positions in fairly valued companies.

Dollar-Cost Averaging: Given the volatility evident in one-year returns (ranging from +20.2% to -44.4%), implementing a dollar-cost averaging strategy can reduce timing risk. Rather than deploying capital in a lump sum, investors can systematically accumulate positions over 3-6 months, averaging into positions at varying price points.

Sector Rotation Considerations: The portfolio's performance varies significantly by company maturity and profitability stage. During periods of economic strength and risk appetite, investors may favor growth-stage companies (GRAB, DDL) despite higher volatility. During economic uncertainty, defensive positions with strong cash generation (DASH, CART) may outperform.

Catalyst-Based Accumulation: Investors should monitor company-specific catalysts and accumulate positions ahead of anticipated positive developments. For example, GRAB's profitability inflection, CART's international expansion, or potential cannabis legalization could serve as catalysts for significant appreciation.

Position Sizing: Given the quality rating variance (7.2 for UBER and DASH down to 5.4 for MAPS), position sizing should reflect conviction levels. Higher-quality companies warrant larger positions, while speculative positions should represent smaller portfolio allocations.

Explore More Investment Opportunities

For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:

📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)

📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)

📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)

🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!

More Articles You Might Like

• Nelson Peltz - Trian Fund Management Portfolio Q3'2025: Top Holdings & Recent Changes
• Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order by Ray Dalio
• The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson
• Principles for Navigating Big Debt Crises by Ray Dalio
• Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini Ph.D.

FAQ Section

Q1: How were these stocks selected?

These six stocks were selected using ValueSense's rigorous fundamental analysis methodology, which evaluates companies across multiple dimensions: free cash flow generation, revenue growth, profitability metrics (gross margin, FCF margin), capital efficiency (ROIC), financial health (debt-to-equity ratios), and quality ratings. All companies operate within the gig economy and digital commerce ecosystem, offering exposure to transformative business models reshaping consumer commerce. The portfolio intentionally includes companies at different maturity stages—from established market leaders to emerging growth opportunities—to accommodate diverse investor preferences.

Q2: What's the best stock from this list?

The "best" stock depends on individual investment objectives and risk tolerance. UBER and DASH offer the highest quality ratings 7.2 and proven business models with strong cash generation, making them suitable for investors seeking stability and established market positions. GRAB offers the highest growth rate (20.2% revenue growth) for investors willing to accept near-term profitability challenges in exchange for emerging market exposure. CART provides the strongest profitability metrics (74.5% gross margin, 27.0% ROIC) for investors prioritizing cash generation. Value-focused investors may find GRAB, CART, and DDL more attractive due to discounts to intrinsic value, while growth investors may prefer DASH and UBER.

Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?

A diversified approach is generally preferable to concentrating in a single stock. This portfolio's geographic, business model, and profitability diversity provides meaningful risk reduction. However, the appropriate allocation depends on your risk tolerance and investment thesis. Conservative investors might focus on UBER, DASH, and CART (the highest-quality companies with proven profitability). Growth-oriented investors might emphasize GRAB and DDL for emerging market exposure. Speculative investors with high risk tolerance might include MAPS for potential cannabis industry upside. Most investors benefit from holding 3-4 positions rather than all six, allowing for meaningful position sizes while maintaining diversification.

Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?

The primary risks vary by company but include: Regulatory risk (labor classification, cannabis legalization, Chinese regulations), competitive intensity (especially in food delivery and grocery delivery), profitability uncertainty (GRAB, DDL, and MAPS remain unprofitable or minimally profitable), leverage risk (DDL's 213.8% debt-to-equity ratio is concerning), growth deceleration (CART's 10.2% revenue growth is the slowest in the portfolio), and macroeconomic sensitivity (gig economy services are discretionary spending). Additionally, the portfolio's one-year returns range from +20.2% to -44.4%, indicating significant volatility and market skepticism about certain positions.

Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?

Timing depends on your investment philosophy and market outlook. Value investors should prioritize accumulating positions in undervalued stocks (GRAB, CART, DDL, MAPS) that trade below intrinsic value, potentially using market weakness as an opportunity to build positions. Growth investors might focus on companies with strong revenue growth (DASH, GRAB) regardless of near-term valuation. Income-focused investors should prioritize high-FCF-margin companies (DASH, CART, UBER) capable of returning capital to shareholders. Dollar-cost averaging over 3-6 months can reduce timing risk for all investor types. Monitor company-specific catalysts (profitability inflection for GRAB, international expansion for CART, cannabis legalization for MAPS) and accumulate positions ahead of anticipated positive developments.