10 Best Nuclear for February 2026
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The nuclear energy sector is experiencing renewed interest amid global pushes for clean energy transitions, with stocks showing varied performance from explosive 1Y returns like 175.0% to challenges in revenue growth. This ValueSense stock watchlist features 10 nuclear-related picks selected based on intrinsic value analysis, quality ratings (ranging 5.7-7.6), and key metrics like ROIC, FCF margins, and debt levels from ValueSense data. Criteria emphasize undervalued opportunities where intrinsic value exceeds or aligns with market dynamics, focusing on power generation, uranium mining, and advanced reactor developers for diversified nuclear stock picks. These are educational analyses drawn exclusively from provided ValueSense metrics, highlighting potential in commodities and energy infrastructure without constituting advice.
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: GE Vernova Inc. (GEV)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $198.1B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $217.2 |
| 1Y Return | 89.9% |
| Revenue | $38.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | ($325.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | 8.9% |
| FCF margin | (0.9%) |
| Gross margin | 19.8% |
| ROIC | 8.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) stands out with a massive $198.1B market cap and a Quality rating of 6.2, trading against an intrinsic value of $217.2. Despite a negative Free Cash Flow of $325.0M and FCF margin of 0.9%, the company shows solid fundamentals with $38.1B revenue, 8.9% revenue growth, 19.8% gross margin, 8.8% ROIC, and zero Total Debt to Equity at 0.0%. Its impressive 89.9% 1Y Return underscores momentum in the nuclear and energy equipment space, positioning GEV as a large-cap leader in power generation infrastructure. ValueSense analysis reveals balanced operations with low leverage, making it a core holding for those eyeing stable energy sector exposure.
Key Catalysts
- Strong 89.9% 1Y Return signals market confidence in nuclear infrastructure demand.
- 8.9% revenue growth and 8.8% ROIC indicate efficient capital use.
- Debt-free balance sheet (0.0% Total Debt to Equity) supports expansion.
- High $198.1B market cap provides liquidity for institutional interest.
Risk Factors
- Negative $325.0M Free Cash Flow and 0.9% FCF margin may pressure short-term liquidity.
- Moderate Quality rating of 6.2 suggests room for operational improvements.
Stock #2: Cameco Corporation (CCJ)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $54.7B |
| Quality Rating | 7.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $6.3 |
| 1Y Return | 145.3% |
| Revenue | CA$3,464.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | CA$972.5M |
| Revenue Growth | 23.9% |
| FCF margin | 28.1% |
| Gross margin | 32.1% |
| ROIC | 11.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 14.9% |
Investment Thesis
Cameco Corporation (CCJ), a uranium producer, boasts a $54.7B market cap and top-tier Quality rating of 7.6, though its intrinsic value sits at $6.3. Strong CA$3,464.2M revenue, CA$972.5M Free Cash Flow, 23.9% revenue growth, 28.1% FCF margin, 32.1% gross margin, and 11.6% ROIC highlight robust profitability. With a stellar 145.3% 1Y Return and manageable 14.9% Total Debt to Equity, CCJ exemplifies uranium sector strength, offering best value stocks potential in commodities amid nuclear fuel demand.
Key Catalysts
- Exceptional 145.3% 1Y Return driven by uranium price surges.
- 23.9% revenue growth and 28.1% FCF margin show cash generation prowess.
- High 11.6% ROIC and 7.6 Quality rating indicate superior efficiency.
- Positive CA$972.5M Free Cash Flow fuels development projects.
Risk Factors
- Low intrinsic value of $6.3 relative to market cap may signal overvaluation risks.
- 14.9% Total Debt to Equity exposes to commodity price volatility.
Stock #3: Vistra Corp. (VST)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $54.2B |
| Quality Rating | 6.2 |
| Intrinsic Value | $119.0 |
| 1Y Return | -10.2% |
| Revenue | $4,037.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $2,381.0M |
| Revenue Growth | (75.2%) |
| FCF margin | 59.0% |
| Gross margin | 39.6% |
| ROIC | 5.0% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
Vistra Corp. (VST) features a $54.2B market cap and Quality rating of 6.2, with intrinsic value at $119.0. Despite 75.2% revenue growth and -10.2% 1Y Return, it generates strong $2,381.0M Free Cash Flow, 59.0% FCF margin, $4,037.0M revenue, 39.6% gross margin, 5.0% ROIC, and 0.0% Total Debt to Equity. This profile suits undervalued stocks in nuclear power generation, where high margins offset revenue dips, per ValueSense data.
Key Catalysts
- Impressive 59.0% FCF margin and $2,381.0M Free Cash Flow.
- 39.6% gross margin supports profitability resilience.
- Zero Total Debt to Equity enhances financial flexibility.
- Large $54.2B market cap attracts energy sector investors.
Risk Factors
- Sharp 75.2% revenue growth decline raises sustainability questions.
- Negative -10.2% 1Y Return reflects recent underperformance.
Stock #4: Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.0B |
| Quality Rating | 7.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $32.2 |
| 1Y Return | 175.0% |
| Revenue | â©97.3T |
| Free Cash Flow | â©1,457.4B |
| Revenue Growth | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 1.5% |
| Gross margin | 60.9% |
| ROIC | 6.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | N/A |
Investment Thesis
Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) has a $26.0B market cap, Quality rating of 7.0, and intrinsic value of $32.2. Metrics include â©97.3T revenue, â©1,457.4B Free Cash Flow, 5.3% revenue growth, 1.5% FCF margin, 60.9% gross margin, 6.3% ROIC, with Total Debt to Equity N/A. The 175.0% 1Y Return positions KEP as a high-momentum nuclear stock pick in utilities.
Key Catalysts
- Record 175.0% 1Y Return from energy demand.
- Massive â©97.3T revenue and 60.9% gross margin.
- Positive â©1,457.4B Free Cash Flow aids stability.
- Solid 7.0 Quality rating and 6.3% ROIC.
Risk Factors
- Low 1.5% FCF margin limits cash efficiency.
- N/A Total Debt to Equity obscures leverage risks.
Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.
Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?
Find Hidden Gems First!
Stock #5: Oklo Inc. (OKLO)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.4B |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $5.6 |
| 1Y Return | 90.0% |
| Revenue | $0.0 |
| Free Cash Flow | ($68.5M) |
| Revenue Growth | N/A |
| FCF margin | N/A |
| Gross margin | N/A |
| ROIC | (220.9%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.1% |
Investment Thesis
Oklo Inc. (OKLO), a speculative nuclear innovator, shows $12.4B market cap, 6.0 Quality rating, and $5.6 intrinsic value. With $0.0 revenue, $68.5M Free Cash Flow, N/A growth metrics, 220.9% ROIC, and low 0.1% Total Debt to Equity, plus 90.0% 1Y Return, it represents high-risk, high-reward in advanced reactors.
Key Catalysts
- Strong 90.0% 1Y Return on nuclear tech hype.
- Minimal 0.1% Total Debt to Equity preserves flexibility.
- Emerging player in next-gen nuclear space.
Risk Factors
- Zero revenue and negative $68.5M Free Cash Flow.
- Poor 220.9% ROIC signals early-stage losses.
Stock #6: NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7,140.8M |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $2.0 |
| 1Y Return | 85.1% |
| Revenue | CA$0.0 |
| Free Cash Flow | (CA$280.5M) |
| Revenue Growth | N/A |
| FCF margin | N/A |
| Gross margin | N/A |
| ROIC | (10.2%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | N/A |
Investment Thesis
NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) has $7,140.8M market cap, 5.8 Quality rating, $2.0 intrinsic value, CA$0.0 revenue, CA$280.5M Free Cash Flow, N/A margins, 10.2% ROIC, and N/A debt. 85.1% 1Y Return highlights uranium exploration potential.
Key Catalysts
- Robust 85.1% 1Y Return in uranium cycle.
- Development-stage upside in commodities.
Risk Factors
- No revenue and negative cash flows.
- Negative 10.2% ROIC and N/A debt data.
Stock #7: NuScale Power Corporation (SMR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5,873.3M |
| Quality Rating | 6.1 |
| Intrinsic Value | $4.2 |
| 1Y Return | -25.9% |
| Revenue | $55.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($282.4M) |
| Revenue Growth | 654.0% |
| FCF margin | (507.5%) |
| Gross margin | 76.7% |
| ROIC | 4,960.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) features $5,873.3M market cap, 6.1 Quality rating, $4.2 intrinsic value, $55.7M revenue, 654.0% revenue growth, but $282.4M Free Cash Flow, 76.7% gross margin, extreme 4,960.2% ROIC, and 0.0% debt. -25.9% 1Y Return contrasts growth.
Key Catalysts
- Explosive 654.0% revenue growth.
- High 76.7% gross margin and 4,960.2% ROIC.
- Debt-free at 0.0%.
Risk Factors
- $282.4M Free Cash Flow and -25.9% 1Y Return.
- 507.5% FCF margin shows burn rate.
Stock #8: Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2,872.6M |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $69.1 |
| 1Y Return | 5.9% |
| Revenue | $3,728.9M |
| Free Cash Flow | $113.4M |
| Revenue Growth | (5.8%) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% |
| Gross margin | 84.3% |
| ROIC | 5.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 28.4% |
Investment Thesis
Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) offers $2,872.6M market cap, 5.7 Quality rating, $69.1 intrinsic value, $3,728.9M revenue, $113.4M Free Cash Flow, 5.8% revenue growth, 3.0% FCF margin, 84.3% gross margin, 5.1% ROIC, and 28.4% debt. Steady 5.9% 1Y Return for logistics tie-in.
Key Catalysts
- Positive $113.4M Free Cash Flow and 84.3% gross margin.
- $69.1 intrinsic value suggests upside.
Risk Factors
- 5.8% revenue growth and 28.4% debt.
Stock #9: Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. - Eletrobrás (EBR)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2,382.1M |
| Quality Rating | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $13.9 |
| 1Y Return | -81.5% |
| Revenue | R$42.6B |
| Free Cash Flow | R$14.1B |
| Revenue Growth | 12.0% |
| FCF margin | 33.2% |
| Gross margin | 45.9% |
| ROIC | 4.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 68.9% |
Investment Thesis
Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. - Eletrobrás (EBR) has $2,382.1M market cap, 5.7 Quality rating, $13.9 intrinsic value, R$42.6B revenue, R$14.1B Free Cash Flow, 12.0% revenue growth, 33.2% FCF margin, 45.9% gross margin, 4.6% ROIC, but high 68.9% debt. -81.5% 1Y Return flags volatility.
Key Catalysts
- Strong 33.2% FCF margin and R$14.1B Free Cash Flow.
- 12.0% revenue growth in Brazilian power.
Risk Factors
- Severe -81.5% 1Y Return.
- Elevated 68.9% Total Debt to Equity.
Stock #10: Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,127.8M |
| Quality Rating | 5.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $9.4 |
| 1Y Return | -26.5% |
| Revenue | $84.0K |
| Free Cash Flow | ($9,260.3M) |
| Revenue Growth | N/A |
| FCF margin | (11,020,235.0%) |
| Gross margin | (354.9%) |
| ROIC | (295.9%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 1.5% |
Investment Thesis
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) shows $1,127.8M market cap, 5.8 Quality rating, $9.4 intrinsic value, minimal $84.0K revenue, massive $9,260.3M Free Cash Flow, N/A growth, 11,020,235.0% FCF margin, negative margins, 295.9% ROIC, and 1.5% debt. -26.5% 1Y Return for micro-reactor play.
Key Catalysts
- $9.4 intrinsic value potential in innovation.
- Low 1.5% Total Debt to Equity.
Risk Factors
- Extreme losses like 11,020,235.0% FCF margin.
- Negative revenue growth N/A and ROIC.
Portfolio Diversification Insights
These 10 stocks cluster in nuclear energy themes: large-cap power (GEV, VST, KEP), uranium miners (CCJ, NXE), advanced reactors (OKLO, SMR, NNE), and supporting utilities/logistics (EBR, HUBG). Sector allocation favors energy 80% with commodities exposure, balancing high-return leaders like CCJ (145.3% 1Y) against speculative pre-revenue plays like OKLO. Diversification reduces single-stock risk—pair debt-free giants (GEV, VST) with cash-generative miners (CCJ) for stability, while small-caps add growth. Quality ratings average ~6.2, with CCJ's 7.6 leading; monitor intrinsic values for entry points in this stock watchlist.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Consider positions during uranium price dips or nuclear policy announcements, targeting stocks with positive FCF like CCJ or VST for stability. For growth names (SMR, OKLO), watch revenue inflection; use dollar-cost averaging across large/small caps. Track 1Y returns for momentum (e.g., KEP's 175.0%) but pair with ROIC >5% for quality. Educational strategy: allocate 40% established, 30% miners, 30% innovators, entering on pullbacks to intrinsic values.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- Nelson Peltz - Trian Fund Management Portfolio Q3'2025: Top Holdings & Recent Changes
- Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order by Ray Dalio
- The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson
- Principles for Navigating Big Debt Crises by Ray Dalio
- Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini Ph.D.
FAQ Section
How were these stocks selected?
Selected via ValueSense criteria focusing on intrinsic value, Quality ratings (5.7-7.6), ROIC, FCF, and nuclear theme relevance for top stocks to buy now[1].
What's the best stock from this list?
CCJ leads with 7.6 Quality rating, 145.3% 1Y Return, and 28.1% FCF margin, though all offer unique investment opportunities[2].
Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Diversify across power producers, miners, and innovators to balance risks like negative FCF in small-caps with stable large-caps like GEV[4].
What are the biggest risks with these picks?
Key risks include negative cash flows (e.g., OKLO), revenue volatility (VST), high debt (EBR), and pre-revenue stages (NXE, NNE)[5].
When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal during sector catalysts like energy policy shifts or uranium rallies, focusing on intrinsic value alignments for stock picks[3].