10 Best Online Lending for February 2026
Welcome to the Value Sense Blog, your resource for insights on the stock market! At Value Sense, we focus on intrinsic value tools and offer stock ideas with undervalued companies. Dive into our research products and learn more about our unique approach at valuesense.io
Explore diverse stock ideas covering technology, healthcare, and commodities sectors. Our insights are crafted to help investors spot opportunities in undervalued growth stocks, enhancing potential returns. Visit us to see evaluations and in-depth market research.
Market Overview & Selection Criteria
The financial services and fintech sectors continue to present compelling opportunities for value-conscious investors seeking exposure to digital transformation and financial inclusion trends. Our selection methodology focuses on companies demonstrating strong intrinsic value potential, sustainable revenue growth, and operational efficiency metrics that suggest undervaluation relative to long-term earnings power.
These 10 stocks were selected based on ValueSense's proprietary analysis framework, evaluating quality ratings, free cash flow generation, return on invested capital (ROIC), and margin expansion potential. The portfolio spans online lending platforms, financial technology providers, and specialized finance companies—sectors experiencing structural shifts toward digital-first business models. Each company represents a distinct investment thesis, from established market leaders to emerging growth platforms with significant upside potential.
Featured Stock Analysis
Stock #1: Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $87.4B |
| Quality Rating | 6.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $80.4 |
| 1Y Return | 32.1% |
| Revenue | $13.5B |
| Free Cash Flow | $3,665.8M |
| Revenue Growth | 28.5% |
| FCF margin | 27.1% |
| Gross margin | 43.0% |
| ROIC | 35.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 23.1% |
Investment Thesis
Nu Holdings represents a leading digital banking platform serving Latin America with a market capitalization of $87.4B and exceptional financial metrics that justify its premium valuation. The company demonstrates remarkable operational efficiency with a 27.1% free cash flow margin and 35.8% return on invested capital, indicating management's ability to convert revenue into shareholder value. With $13.5B in annual revenue and 28.5% year-over-year growth, Nu is executing a scalable fintech model that addresses underbanked populations across the region.
The company's 32.1% one-year return reflects market recognition of its competitive moat and growth trajectory. A quality rating of 6.8 out of 10 indicates solid fundamentals, while the 43% gross margin demonstrates pricing power and operational leverage. With minimal debt (23.1% debt-to-equity ratio), Nu maintains financial flexibility for strategic investments and shareholder returns, positioning it as a cornerstone holding for investors seeking exposure to Latin American financial digitalization.
Key Catalysts
- Continued user acquisition and wallet penetration in underserved markets
- Expansion of financial services offerings beyond banking
- Operating leverage as the platform scales across multiple countries
- Potential profitability acceleration as customer acquisition costs decline
Risk Factors
- Regulatory changes in Latin American markets affecting fintech operations
- Currency fluctuation exposure across multiple jurisdictions
- Competitive pressure from traditional banks entering digital channels
- Macroeconomic slowdown impacting consumer spending and credit demand
Stock #2: SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.7B |
| Quality Rating | 5.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $11.0 |
| 1Y Return | 38.7% |
| Revenue | $4,361.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($2,929.9M) |
| Revenue Growth | 17.8% |
| FCF margin | (67.2%) |
| Gross margin | 58.8% |
| ROIC | 14.2% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
SoFi Technologies operates a diversified fintech platform targeting millennials and Gen Z consumers with $26.7B in market capitalization and $4.4B in annual revenue. The company's 58.8% gross margin reflects strong pricing power across its lending, investing, and banking products. Despite negative free cash flow of $2.9B, the company is investing heavily in customer acquisition and product development, with 17.8% revenue growth demonstrating market traction in competitive financial services segments.
The 38.7% one-year return indicates investor confidence in the company's turnaround narrative and path to profitability. With zero debt and a quality rating of 5.6, SoFi represents a leveraged play on the fintech adoption thesis, particularly among younger demographics seeking integrated financial solutions. The company's intrinsic value estimate of $11.0 suggests potential upside as the platform achieves scale and operational efficiency improvements.
Key Catalysts
- Achievement of positive free cash flow as customer acquisition costs normalize
- Cross-selling opportunities across lending, investing, and banking products
- Expansion of banking services and deposit growth
- Potential profitability inflection as revenue growth accelerates
Risk Factors
- Significant cash burn and path to profitability uncertainty
- Intense competition from established financial institutions and fintech startups
- Interest rate sensitivity affecting lending margins and consumer demand
- Regulatory scrutiny of fintech lending and banking operations
Stock #3: Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,518.2M |
| Quality Rating | 6.6 |
| Intrinsic Value | $97.0 |
| 1Y Return | 101.3% |
| Revenue | $1,226.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $181.4M |
| Revenue Growth | 30.5% |
| FCF margin | 14.8% |
| Gross margin | 29.3% |
| ROIC | 104.8% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 86.2% |
Investment Thesis
Pagaya Technologies demonstrates exceptional growth momentum with a 101.3% one-year return and 30.5% revenue growth, signaling strong market demand for its AI-powered credit platform. With a $1.5B market capitalization and $1.2B in annual revenue, the company is capturing share in the alternative lending market. The standout metric is a 104.8% return on invested capital, indicating highly efficient capital deployment and strong unit economics underlying the business model.
The 14.8% free cash flow margin shows the company is converting growth into cash generation, while the 29.3% gross margin reflects competitive pricing in the lending marketplace. An intrinsic value estimate of $97.0 suggests significant upside potential, though investors should note the elevated 86.2% debt-to-equity ratio, which reflects the company's leverage strategy to fund lending operations. The 6.6 quality rating indicates solid operational fundamentals despite the higher leverage profile.
Key Catalysts
- Continued expansion of AI-driven credit decisioning capabilities
- Growth in alternative lending volumes and market share gains
- Potential for margin expansion as platform scales
- Strategic partnerships or acquisitions to enhance product offerings
Risk Factors
- High leverage amplifies downside risk in economic downturns
- Credit quality deterioration if borrower defaults increase
- Regulatory changes affecting alternative lending platforms
- Competition from traditional lenders and other fintech platforms
Stock #4: PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,271.2M |
| Quality Rating | 6.9 |
| Intrinsic Value | $143.2 |
| 1Y Return | -25.0% |
| Revenue | $1,912.1M |
| Free Cash Flow | $295.6M |
| Revenue Growth | (20.9%) |
| FCF margin | 15.5% |
| Gross margin | 75.6% |
| ROIC | 25.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
PROG Holdings operates a specialized consumer finance business with a $1.3B market capitalization and $1.9B in annual revenue, demonstrating resilience in niche lending markets. The company's 75.6% gross margin is exceptional, reflecting strong pricing power and operational efficiency in its core business. With a 25.1% return on invested capital and 15.5% free cash flow margin, PROG generates substantial cash returns to shareholders while maintaining zero debt, providing financial stability and flexibility.
The company's 6.9 quality rating is the highest in this portfolio, indicating superior operational fundamentals and business model quality. However, the -25% one-year return and -20.9% revenue decline reflect near-term headwinds, potentially creating a value opportunity for contrarian investors. The $143.2 intrinsic value estimate suggests the market may be overestimating the severity of current challenges, presenting a potential recovery play for patient capital.
Key Catalysts
- Stabilization of revenue trends as market conditions normalize
- Margin expansion through operational efficiency improvements
- Potential for strategic acquisitions or market consolidation
- Return to growth as consumer credit demand recovers
Risk Factors
- Ongoing revenue decline and market share pressure
- Sensitivity to consumer credit cycles and economic slowdowns
- Regulatory changes affecting consumer lending practices
- Potential for further valuation compression if trends deteriorate
Stock #5: Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1,064.6M |
| Quality Rating | 5.4 |
| Intrinsic Value | $312.5 |
| 1Y Return | -36.8% |
| Revenue | $4,577.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | $109.4M |
| Revenue Growth | 7.5% |
| FCF margin | 2.4% |
| Gross margin | 47.9% |
| ROIC | 10.1% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 266.7% |
Investment Thesis
Upbound Group represents a diversified consumer finance platform with $1.1B market capitalization and $4.6B in annual revenue, serving credit-challenged consumers through multiple lending channels. The company's 47.9% gross margin demonstrates pricing power in its target market, while the 10.1% return on invested capital indicates reasonable capital efficiency. With 7.5% revenue growth and a 2.4% free cash flow margin, the company is generating modest cash returns despite challenging market conditions.
The 5.4 quality rating reflects operational challenges, and the -36.8% one-year return indicates significant investor skepticism. However, the $312.5 intrinsic value estimate suggests substantial upside potential if the company can stabilize operations and improve capital efficiency. The elevated 266.7% debt-to-equity ratio is a critical concern, reflecting high financial leverage that amplifies both upside and downside scenarios. This position is suitable only for risk-tolerant investors with conviction in a turnaround narrative.
Key Catalysts
- Debt reduction and balance sheet strengthening
- Operational efficiency improvements and cost management
- Stabilization of credit quality and default rates
- Potential strategic alternatives or restructuring
Risk Factors
- Extreme leverage creates significant financial distress risk
- Deteriorating credit quality and rising default rates
- Limited financial flexibility for strategic investments
- Potential covenant violations or refinancing challenges
Stock #6: Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $611.4M |
| Quality Rating | 4.8 |
| Intrinsic Value | $5.2 |
| 1Y Return | -39.9% |
| Revenue | $132.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($6,004.0K) |
| Revenue Growth | (15.4%) |
| FCF margin | (4.5%) |
| Gross margin | 69.0% |
| ROIC | (51.3%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
Blend Labs operates a digital mortgage and lending platform with $611.4M market capitalization and $132.6M in annual revenue, serving the mortgage origination and consumer lending markets. The company's 69% gross margin reflects strong software-as-a-service economics and pricing power with financial institution customers. However, the -39.9% one-year return and -15.4% revenue decline indicate significant operational challenges and market headwinds affecting the mortgage technology sector.
The 4.8 quality rating is the lowest in this portfolio, reflecting negative free cash flow of $6M and a -51.3% return on invested capital, suggesting the company is destroying shareholder value at current operations. The $5.2 intrinsic value estimate appears conservative relative to the company's market price, indicating potential deep value opportunity if the company can return to growth and profitability. With zero debt, the company has financial flexibility to navigate current challenges, but execution risk is elevated.
Risk Factors
- Negative free cash flow and path to profitability uncertainty
- Declining revenue and potential market share losses
- Mortgage market cyclicality and refinancing volume sensitivity
- Competitive pressure from established mortgage technology providers
- Potential for further valuation compression if trends continue
Most investors waste time on the wrong metrics. We've spent 10,000+ hours perfecting our value investing engine to find what actually matters.
Want to see what we'll uncover next - before everyone else does?
Find Hidden Gems First!
Stock #7: Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $336.1M |
| Quality Rating | 6.7 |
| Intrinsic Value | $67.8 |
| 1Y Return | -18.9% |
| Revenue | CN¥6,536.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | CN¥0.0 |
| Revenue Growth | 9.0% |
| FCF margin | 0.0% |
| Gross margin | 80.9% |
| ROIC | 28.3% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.8% |
Investment Thesis
Jiayin Group operates a Chinese online lending platform with $336.1M market capitalization and CN¥6.5B in annual revenue, serving the consumer credit market in China. The company's 80.9% gross margin is exceptional, reflecting strong pricing power and platform economics in the online lending space. With a 28.3% return on invested capital and minimal debt (0.8% debt-to-equity), the company demonstrates efficient capital deployment and financial stability.
The 6.7 quality rating indicates solid operational fundamentals, though the -18.9% one-year return reflects broader challenges in Chinese fintech regulation and market sentiment. The $67.8 intrinsic value estimate suggests potential upside if regulatory concerns ease and the company can return to growth. However, the zero free cash flow metric warrants attention, suggesting the company may be reinvesting all earnings or facing cash conversion challenges despite strong profitability metrics.
Key Catalysts
- Regulatory clarity and potential easing of fintech restrictions in China
- Return to revenue growth as market conditions stabilize
- Expansion of lending products and customer base
- Potential for dividend initiation as cash generation improves
Risk Factors
- Chinese regulatory environment and potential policy changes
- Geopolitical tensions affecting Chinese technology companies
- Credit quality deterioration in Chinese consumer lending markets
- Currency risk and capital controls affecting foreign investors
Stock #8: OppFi Inc. (OPFI)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $257.9M |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $304.0 |
| 1Y Return | -31.1% |
| Revenue | $14.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $278.6M |
| Revenue Growth | 2,658.1% |
| FCF margin | 1.9% |
| Gross margin | 2.1% |
| ROIC | 528.9% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 55.2% |
Investment Thesis
OppFi operates an alternative lending platform with $257.9M market capitalization and $14.4B in annual revenue, demonstrating extraordinary growth with 2,658.1% year-over-year revenue expansion. This exceptional growth rate reflects either a significant acquisition, business combination, or accounting methodology change that warrants careful analysis. The company's 528.9% return on invested capital is extraordinary, suggesting highly efficient capital deployment, though such metrics often indicate early-stage profitability or accounting adjustments.
The 1.9% free cash flow margin and 2.1% gross margin indicate the company operates in a highly competitive lending market with thin margins, relying on volume and scale for profitability. With $278.6M in free cash flow generation, the company is converting revenue into cash despite low margins. The 55.2% debt-to-equity ratio reflects moderate leverage, while the $304.0 intrinsic value estimate suggests potential upside. The 6.0 quality rating indicates adequate operational fundamentals, though the extreme growth metrics warrant due diligence.
Key Catalysts
- Continued revenue growth and market share expansion
- Margin expansion through operational efficiency and scale
- Potential for profitability acceleration
- Strategic partnerships or product expansion
Risk Factors
- Extreme leverage in lending operations amplifies downside risk
- Thin margins provide limited cushion for adverse conditions
- Credit quality deterioration affecting loan performance
- Regulatory changes affecting alternative lending platforms
Stock #9: DeFi Development Corp. (DFDV)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $116.1M |
| Quality Rating | 6.3 |
| Intrinsic Value | $23.3 |
| 1Y Return | -50.9% |
| Revenue | $7,527.1K |
| Free Cash Flow | ($7,228.9K) |
| Revenue Growth | 313.4% |
| FCF margin | (96.0%) |
| Gross margin | 98.3% |
| ROIC | 2,196.6% |
| Total Debt to Equity | 0.0% |
Investment Thesis
DeFi Development Corp. operates in the emerging decentralized finance sector with $116.1M market capitalization and $7.5M in annual revenue, representing an early-stage venture in blockchain-based financial services. The company's 98.3% gross margin reflects the software-like economics of blockchain applications, though the -96% free cash flow margin indicates significant cash burn relative to revenue. The extraordinary 2,196.6% return on invested capital suggests either exceptional capital efficiency or accounting anomalies requiring careful analysis.
The 313.4% revenue growth demonstrates strong market demand for decentralized finance solutions, though the -50.9% one-year return reflects volatility and investor skepticism about the sector. With zero debt and a 6.3 quality rating, the company maintains financial flexibility despite negative cash flow. The $23.3 intrinsic value estimate suggests potential upside for investors with conviction in the DeFi thesis, though execution risk is elevated given the early-stage nature of the business.
Key Catalysts
- Mainstream adoption of decentralized finance applications
- Regulatory clarity around cryptocurrency and blockchain assets
- Product expansion and user growth acceleration
- Potential for profitability as platform scales
Risk Factors
- Significant cash burn and path to profitability uncertainty
- Regulatory uncertainty and potential restrictions on DeFi activities
- Cryptocurrency market volatility affecting user demand
- Technology risk and potential security vulnerabilities
- Extreme valuation risk given early-stage business model
Stock #10: WISeKey International Holding AG (WKEY)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $66.9M |
| Quality Rating | 6.0 |
| Intrinsic Value | $53.7 |
| 1Y Return | -1.3% |
| Revenue | $32.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | ($41.0M) |
| Revenue Growth | (35.0%) |
| FCF margin | (126.0%) |
| Gross margin | 54.2% |
| ROIC | (372.5%) |
| Total Debt to Equity | 3.9% |
Investment Thesis
WISeKey International operates in cybersecurity and digital identity solutions with $66.9M market capitalization and $32.6M in annual revenue, serving enterprise and government customers. The company's 54.2% gross margin reflects software and services pricing power, though the -35% revenue decline and -126% free cash flow margin indicate significant operational challenges. The -372.5% return on invested capital suggests the company is destroying shareholder value at current operations, with negative free cash flow of $41M exceeding annual revenue.
The 6.0 quality rating reflects these operational difficulties, while the -1.3% one-year return indicates relative stability despite fundamental challenges. The $53.7 intrinsic value estimate suggests potential upside if the company can stabilize revenue and return to profitability, though execution risk is substantial. With minimal debt (3.9% debt-to-equity), the company has financial flexibility, but the path to sustainable profitability remains unclear.
Risk Factors
- Severe revenue decline and potential market share losses
- Negative free cash flow and significant cash burn
- Uncertain path to profitability and cash flow positivity
- Competitive pressure in cybersecurity markets
- Potential for further valuation compression if trends continue
Portfolio Diversification Insights
This 10-stock portfolio provides diversified exposure across multiple financial services and technology segments, with distinct risk-return profiles suitable for different investor objectives. The portfolio divides into three primary clusters:
Established Growth Leaders (NU, SOFI): These companies demonstrate strong revenue growth (28-39%) and market traction, with NU showing exceptional profitability metrics and SOFI representing a leveraged play on fintech adoption. Together, they provide core exposure to digital financial services transformation.
High-Growth Platforms (PGY, OPFI, DFDV): These companies exhibit exceptional revenue growth (313-2,658%) and strong gross margins, though with varying profitability profiles. They represent higher-risk, higher-reward opportunities for investors seeking exposure to emerging financial technology trends.
Value Recovery Opportunities (PRG, UPBD, BLND, JFIN, WKEY): These companies face near-term headwinds with negative one-year returns (-1% to -40%), but offer potential value opportunities if management can execute turnarounds. They appeal to contrarian investors with conviction in recovery narratives.
Sector Allocation: The portfolio emphasizes online lending (NU, SOFI, PGY, OPFI, UPBD) with complementary exposure to mortgage technology (BLND), consumer finance (PRG, JFIN), and emerging technologies (DFDV, WKEY). This diversification reduces concentration risk while maintaining thematic coherence around financial services digitalization.
Risk Considerations: The portfolio ranges from low-leverage, profitable companies (NU, PRG) to highly leveraged platforms (UPBD, PGY) and cash-burning startups (BLND, DFDV). Investors should size positions according to risk tolerance and investment horizon, with larger allocations to established leaders and smaller positions in speculative opportunities.
Market Timing & Entry Strategies
Valuation-Based Entry Points: The portfolio includes both premium-priced growth leaders (NU at 32% one-year return) and deeply discounted value opportunities (UPBD, BLND, WKEY at -25% to -40% returns). A dollar-cost averaging approach over 3-6 months allows investors to accumulate positions across varying valuations while reducing timing risk.
Sector Rotation Considerations: Online lending platforms benefit from rising interest rates and credit demand, while mortgage technology companies (BLND) face headwinds from declining refinancing volumes. Investors should consider tactical overweighting toward online lending platforms during periods of economic strength and credit expansion.
Growth vs. Value Positioning: Investors with 3-5 year horizons should emphasize established growth leaders (NU, SOFI, PGY) with proven business models and positive cash flow generation. Longer-term investors (5+ years) can allocate to recovery plays (PRG, UPBD) and emerging technologies (DFDV) with conviction in multi-year turnarounds.
Risk Management Framework: Given the portfolio's diversity, investors should implement position sizing discipline, allocating 2-3% to speculative positions (DFDV, WKEY), 3-5% to value recovery plays (UPBD, BLND), and 5-8% to established growth leaders (NU, SOFI). This approach balances upside potential with downside protection.
Explore More Investment Opportunities
For investors seeking undervalued companies with high fundamental quality, our analytics team provides curated stock lists:
📌 50 Undervalued Stocks (Best overall value plays for 2025)
📌 50 Undervalued Dividend Stocks (For income-focused investors)
📌 50 Undervalued Growth Stocks (High-growth potential with strong fundamentals)
🔍 Check out these stocks on the Value Sense platform for free!
More Articles You Might Like
- Nelson Peltz - Trian Fund Management Portfolio Q3'2025: Top Holdings & Recent Changes
- Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order by Ray Dalio
- The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson
- Principles for Navigating Big Debt Crises by Ray Dalio
- Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini Ph.D.
FAQ Section
Q1: How were these stocks selected?
These 10 stocks were selected using ValueSense's proprietary analysis framework, evaluating companies based on intrinsic value potential, quality ratings, free cash flow generation, return on invested capital, and margin expansion opportunities. The selection methodology prioritizes companies with sustainable competitive advantages, efficient capital deployment, and valuations suggesting upside potential relative to fundamental earnings power. Each company represents a distinct investment thesis within the financial services and fintech ecosystem.
Q2: What's the best stock from this list?
Nu Holdings (NU) demonstrates the strongest combination of growth, profitability, and financial stability, with 28.5% revenue growth, 35.8% return on invested capital, and a 27.1% free cash flow margin. The company's 6.8 quality rating and minimal debt provide downside protection, while the 32.1% one-year return reflects market recognition of its competitive position. For investors seeking established growth with lower risk, NU represents the portfolio's highest-conviction position.
Q3: Should I buy all these stocks or diversify?
Portfolio construction depends on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Conservative investors should focus on established leaders (NU, SOFI, PGY) with proven business models and positive cash generation. Aggressive investors can allocate smaller positions to recovery plays (UPBD, BLND) and emerging technologies (DFDV) for upside exposure. A balanced approach allocates 50-60% to growth leaders, 25-35% to value recovery opportunities, and 10-15% to speculative positions.
Q4: What are the biggest risks with these picks?
The portfolio faces distinct risks across segments: online lending platforms face credit quality deterioration and regulatory changes; mortgage technology companies are sensitive to refinancing volume cycles; highly leveraged companies (UPBD, PGY) amplify downside risk during economic downturns; and emerging technologies (DFDV) face regulatory uncertainty and cash burn challenges. Investors should implement position sizing discipline and monitor key metrics including free cash flow trends, debt levels, and revenue growth rates.
Q5: When is the best time to invest in these stocks?
Optimal entry timing depends on individual company dynamics and broader market conditions. Established growth leaders (NU, SOFI) offer attractive entry points during market corrections when valuations compress. Value recovery plays (PRG, UPBD) present opportunities when management demonstrates operational improvements and stabilization. A dollar-cost averaging approach over 3-6 months reduces timing risk while allowing accumulation across varying valuations. Investors should monitor quarterly earnings reports and management guidance for catalysts signaling improved execution.